EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 231 (2018) MATEC Web Conf., 231 (2018) 01005 References
Open Access
Issue
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 231, 2018
12th International Road Safety Conference GAMBIT 2018 - “Road Innovations for Safety - The National and Regional Perspective”
Article Number 01005
Number of page(s) 9
Section Safe road infrastructure
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201823101005
Published online 16 November 2018
  1. J.O. Hallquist, LS-DYNA Theory Manual (Livermore Software Technology Corporation, 2006) [Google Scholar]
  2. LS-DYNA Keyword User's Manual (Livermore Software Technology Corporation, 2015) [Google Scholar]
  3. European Standard EN 1317-1-5 (2010) [Google Scholar]
  4. British Standard PD CEN/TR 16303-1-5 (2012) [Google Scholar]
  5. K. Jamroz, S. Burzyński, W. Witkowski, K. Wilde, Numerical methods for the assessment of bridge safety barriers, in: M. Kleiber, T. Burczyński, K. Wilde, J. Gorski, K. Winkelmann, Ł. Smakosz (Eds.), Adv. Mech. Theor. Comput. Interdiscip. Issues, 1st ed., pp. 231-234 (CRC Press, 2016) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. W. Borkowski, Z. Hryciów, P. Rybak, J. Wysocki, Numerical simulation of the standard TB11 and TB32 tests for a concrete safety barrier, KONES Powetrain Transp. 17 (2010) [Google Scholar]
  7. M. Borovinšek, M. Vesenjak, M. Ulbin, Z. Ren, Simulation of crash tests for high containment levels of road safety barriers, Eng. Fail. Anal. 14 pp. 1711-1718 (2007). doi:10.1016/J.ENGFAILANAL.2006.11.068 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. K. Wilde, K. Jamroz, D. Bruski, S. Burzyński, J. Chróścielewski, W. Witkowski, Numerical simulations of bus crash-test with barrier and truss supporting structure (in Polish), J. Civ. Eng. Environ. Archit. 63 pp. 455-467 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  9. M. Klasztorny, D.B. Nycz, P. Szurgott, Modelling and simulation of crash tests of N2-W4-A category safety road barrier in horizontal concave arc, Int. J. Crashworthiness. 21 pp. 644-659 (2016). doi:10.1080/13588265.2016.1212962 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. K. Wilde, D. Bruski, S. Burzyński, J. Chróścielewski, W. Witkowski, Numerical crash analysis of the cable barrier, in: J. Awrejcewicz, M. Kaźmierczak, J. Mrozowski, P. Olejnik (Eds.), DSTA-2017 Conf. Books, pp. 555-566 (Department of Automation, Biomechanics and Mechatronics, 2017) [Google Scholar]
  11. M. Klasztorny, K. Zielonka, D.B. Nycz, P. Posuniak, R.K. Romanowski, Experimental validation of simulated TB32 crash tests for SP-05/2 barrier on horizontal concave arc without and with composite overlay, Arch. Civ. Mech. Eng. 18 pp. 339-355 (2018). doi:10.1016/J.ACME.2017.07.007 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. K. Wilde, K. Jamroz, D. Bruski, M. Budzyński, S. Burzyński, J. Chroscielewski, W. Witkowski, Curb-to-Barrier Face Distance Variation an a TB51 Bridge Barrier Crash Test Simulation, Arch. Civ. Eng. 63 pp. 187-199 (2017). doi:https://doi.org/10.1515/ace-2017-0024 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. M.R. Ferdous, A. Abu-Odeh, R.P. Bligh, H.L. Jones, N.M. Sheikh, Performance limit analysis for common roadside and median barriers using LS-DYNA, Int. J. Crashworthiness. 16 pp. 691-706 (2011). doi:10.1080/13588265.2011.623023 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. T.-L. Teng, C.-C. Liang, T.-T. Tran, Development and validation of a finite element model for road safety barrier impact tests, Simulation. 92 pp. 565-578 (2016). doi:10.1177/0037549716644507 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. M. Hadjioannou, D. Stevens, M. Barsotti, Development and Validation of Bolted Connection Modeling in LS-DYNA ® for Large Vehicle Models, in: 14th Int. LS-DYNA Conf., pp. 1-12 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  16. S. Narkhede, N. Lokhande, B. Gangani, G. Gadekar, Bolted Joint Representation in LS-DYNA to Model Bolt Pre-Stress and Bolt Failure Characteristics in Crash Simulations, in: 11th Int. LS-Dyna Users Conf., pp. 11-20 (2010) [Google Scholar]
  17. R. Rahbari, A. Tyas, J. Buick Davison, E.P. Stoddart, Web shear failure of angle-cleat connections loaded at high rates, J. Constr. Steel Res. 103 pp. 37-48 (2014). doi:10.1016/j.jcsr.2014.07.013 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. J.D. Reid, N.R. Hiser, Detailed modeling of bolted joints with slippage, Finite Elem. Anal. Des. 41 pp. 547-562 (2005). doi:10.1016/j.finel.2004.10.001 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. D.A.F. Bayton, T.B. Jones, G. Fourlaris, Analysis of a safety barrier connection joint post-testing, Mater. Des. 29 pp. 915-921 (2008). doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2007.04.010 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. D.B. Nycz, Modelowanie złączy śrubowych segmentów prowadnicy typu B bariery drogowej SP-05/2, Model. Inżynierskie. pp. 105-112 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  21. W. Wu, R. Thomson, A study of the interaction between a guardrail post and soil during quasi-static and dynamic loading, Int. J. Impact Eng. 34 pp. 883-898 (2007). doi:10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2006.04.004 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. E.L. Fasanella, K.E. Jackson, S. Kellas, Soft Soil Impact Testing and Simulation of Aerospace Structures, in: 10th Int. LS-DYNA User's Conf., pp. 29-42 (2008) [Google Scholar]
  23. T. Belytschko, W. Liu, B. Moran, Nonlinear finite elements for continua and structures (Wiley, 2000) [Google Scholar]
  24. M.H. Ray, M. Mongiardini, C.A. Plaxio, M. Anghileri, NCHRP Web-Only Document 179: Procedures for Verification and Validation of Computer Simulations Used for Roadside Safety Applications (Transportation Research Board, 2010) [Google Scholar]
  25. W.L. Oberkampf, M.F. Barone, Measures of agreement between computation and experiment: Validation metrics, J. Comput. Phys. 217 pp. 5-36 (2006). doi:10.1016/J.JCP.2006.03.037 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. M. Mongiardini, M.H. Ray, M. Anghileri, Development of a Software for the Comparison of Curves During the Verification and Validation of Numerical Models, in: 7th Eur. LS-DYNA Conf., (2009) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.