EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 231 (2018) MATEC Web Conf., 231 (2018) 01004 References
Open Access
Issue
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 231, 2018
12th International Road Safety Conference GAMBIT 2018 - “Road Innovations for Safety - The National and Regional Perspective”
Article Number 01004
Number of page(s) 8
Section Safe road infrastructure
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201823101004
Published online 16 November 2018
  1. R. Fuller, Towards a general theory of driver behaviour, Accid. Anal. Prev. 37 pp. 461-72 (2005). doi:10.1016/j.aap.2004.11.003 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. P. Larsson, S.W.A. Dekker, C. Tingvall, The need for a systems theory approach to road safety, Saf. Sci. 48 pp. 1167-1174 (2010). doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2009.10.006 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. D.W. Harwood, F.M. Council, E. Hauer, W.E. Hughes, A. Vogt, Prediction of the Expected Safety Performance of Rural Two-Lane Highways (Federal Highway Administration U.S. Department of Transportation, 2000) [Google Scholar]
  4. Road protection score (RPS) method and pilot results (EuroRAP, 2002) [Google Scholar]
  5. W. Kustra, K. Jamroz, M. Budzynski, Safety PL- A Support Tool for Road Safety Impact Assessment, Transp. Res. Procedia. 14 pp. 3456-3465 (2016). doi:10.1016/J.TRPRO.2016.05.308 [Google Scholar]
  6. A. Fernandes, J. Neves, An approach to accidents modeling based on compounds road environments, Accid. Anal. Prev. 53 pp. 39-45 (2013). doi:10.1016/j.aap.2012.12.041 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. S. Cafiso, A. Di Graziano, G. Di Silvestro, G. La Cava, B. Persaud, Development of comprehensive accident models for two-lane rural highways using exposure, geometry, consistency and context variables, Accid. Anal. Prev. 42 pp. 1072-1079 (2010). doi:10.1016/j.aap.2009.12.015 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. J.N. Ivan, P.E. Garder, Z. Deng, C. Zhang, The effect of segment characteristics on the severity of head-on crashes on two-lane rural highways (University of Connecticut, University of Maine, 2006) [Google Scholar]
  9. M. Garnowski, H. Manner, On factors related to car accidents on German Autobahn connectors, Accid. Anal. Prev. 43 pp. 1864-1871 (2011). doi:10.1016/J.AAP.2011.04.026 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. J. Lee, F. Mannering, Impact of roadside features on the frequency and severity of run-off-roadway accidents: an empirical analysis, Accid. Anal. Prev. 34 pp. 149-161 (2002). doi:10.1016/S0001-4575(01)00009-4 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Accident modification factors (Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2005) [Google Scholar]
  12. C. Wang, M.A. Quddus, S.G. Ison, Predicting accident frequency at their severity levels and its application in site ranking using a two-stage mixed multivariate model, Accid. Anal. Prev. 43 pp. 1979-1990 (2011). doi:10.1016/J.AAP.2011.05.016 [Google Scholar]
  13. A. Jacob, R. Dhanya, M.V.L.R. Anjaneyulu, Geometric Design Consistency of Multiple Horizontal Curves on Two-lane Rural Highways, Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci. 104 pp. 1068-1077 (2013). doi:10.1016/J.SBSPRO.2013.11.202 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. M.A. Abdel-Aty, A.E. Radwan, Modeling traffic accident occurrence and involvement, Accid. Anal. Prev. 32 pp. 633-642 (2000). doi:10.1016/S0001-4575(99)00094-9 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. M.F. Muhammad, H.J. Mohammed, Concrete road barriers subjected to impact loads: An overview, Lat. Am. J. Solids Struct. 12 pp. 1824-1858 (2015). doi:10.1590/1679-78251783 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. S. Mondal, Y. Lucet, W. Hare, Optimizing horizontal alignment of roads in a specified corridor, Comput. Oper. Res. 64 pp. 130-138 (2015). doi:10.1016/J.COR.2015.05.018 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. A Guide for Reducing Collisions on Horizontal Curves. NCHRP Report 500(7) (Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2004). doi:10.17226/13545 [Google Scholar]
  18. S. Othman, R. Thomson, G. Lannér, Safety Analysis of Horizontal Curves Using Real Traffic Data, J. Transp. Eng. 140 pp. 04014005 (2014). doi:10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000626 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. C. Jurewicz, R. Excel, Application of a Crash-predictive Risk Assessment Model to Prioritise Road Safety Investment in Australia, Transp. Res. Procedia. 14 pp. 2101-2110 (2016). doi:10.1016/J.TRPRO.2016.05.225 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. G. Yannis, A. Dragomanovits, A. Laiou, T. Richter, S. Ruhl, F. La Torre, L. Domenichini, D. Graham, N. Karathodorou, H. Li, Use of Accident Prediction Models in Road Safety Management - An International Inquiry, Transp. Res. Procedia. 14 pp. 4257-4266 (2016). doi:10.1016/J.TRPRO.2016.05.397 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. T. Esposito, R. Mauro, F. Russo, G. Dell'Acqua, Speed prediction models for sustainable road safety management, Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci. 20 pp. 568-576 (2011). doi:10.1016/J.SBSPRO.2011.08.063 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. M. Klasztorny, K. Zielonka, D.B. Nycz, P. Posuniak, R. Romanowski, Experimental and simulation crash tests of the SP-05/2 barrier in the concave horizontal curve, in: XIV Sci. Tech. Conf. Comput. Technol. Eng., (2016) [Google Scholar]
  23. R.P. Nasution, R.A. Siregar, K. Fuad, A.H. Adom, The Effect of ASI (Acceleration Severity Index) to Different Crash Velocities, in: Proc. Int. Conf. Appl. Des. Mech. Eng., pp. 11-13 (2009) [Google Scholar]
  24. W. Borkowski, Z. Hryciów, P. Rybak, J. Wysocki, Analysis of the effectiveness of concrete protection barriers on the road curve, Mech. Rev. LXXI pp. 21-24 (2012) [Google Scholar]
  25. D. Nycz, Modeling and numerical tests of crash tests of N2-W4-A class barriers on road curves, Military University of Technology, Warsaw, 2015 [Google Scholar]
  26. D. Marzougui, U. Mahadevaiah, F. Tahan, C.D. Kan, R. McGinnis, R. Powers, Guidance for selection, use and maintenance of cable barrier system. NCHRP Raport 711 (Transport Research Board, Washington, USA, 2012) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. PN-EN 1317-1 Road restraint systems, Part 1: Terminology and general criteria for test methods, (2010) [Google Scholar]
  28. PN-EN 1317-2 Road restraint systems, Part 2: Performance classes, impact test acceptance criteria and test methods for safety barriers (2010) [Google Scholar]
  29. J.O. Hallquist, LS-DYNA Theory Manual (Livermore Software Technology Corporation, 2006) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.