Open Access
Issue
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 231, 2018
12th International Road Safety Conference GAMBIT 2018 - “Road Innovations for Safety - The National and Regional Perspective”
Article Number 01006
Number of page(s) 9
Section Safe road infrastructure
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201823101006
Published online 16 November 2018
  1. S. Cafiso, C. D'Agostino, Assessing the stochastic variability of the Benefit-Cost ratio in roadway safety management, Accid. Anal. Prev. 93 pp. 189-197 (2016). doi:10.1016/j.aap.2016.04.027 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. S. Cafiso, C. D'Agostino, Reliability-Based Assessment of Benefits in Roadway Safety Management, Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board. 2513 pp. 1-10 (2015). doi:10.3141/2513-01 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. C. D'Agostino, Investigating Transferability and Goodness of Fit of Two Different Approaches of Segmentation And Model form for estimating safety performance of Motorways, Procedia Eng. 84 pp. 613-623 (2014). doi:10.1016/J.PROENG.2014.10.478 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Use and application of microsimulation traffic models. AP-R286/06 (Austroads, 2006) [Google Scholar]
  5. R. Dowling, A. Skabardonis, V. Alexiadis, Traffic Analysis Toolbox Volume III: Guidelines for Applying Traffic Microsimulation Software, FHWA-HRT-04-040 (Federal Highway Administration U.S. Department of Transportation, 2004) [Google Scholar]
  6. F. Huang, P. Liu, H. Yu, W. Wang, Identifying if VISSIM simulation model and SSAM provide reasonable estimates for field measured traffic conflicts at signalized intersections, Accid. Anal. Prev. 50 pp. 1014-1024 (2013). doi:10.1016/J.AAP.2012.08.018 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. L. Pu, J. Rahul, Surrogate Safety Assessment Model (SSAM): Software User Manual. FHWA-HRT-08-050 (Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2008) [Google Scholar]
  8. C. Wang, N. Stamatiadis, Surrogate Safety Measure for Simulation-Based Conflict Study, Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board. 2386 pp. 72-80 (2013). doi:10.3141/2386-09 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. R. Fan, W. Wang, P. Liu, H. Yu, Using VISSIM simulation model and Surrogate Safety Assessment Model for estimating field measured traffic conflicts at freeway merge areas, IET Intell. Transp. Syst. 7 pp. 68-77 (2013). doi:10.1049/iet-its.2011.0232 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. U.E. Shahdah, F.F. Saccomanno, B. Persaud, Integrating Observational and Traffic Simulation Models for Priority Ranking of Unsafe Intersections, Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board. 2280 pp. 118-126 (2012). doi:10.3141/2280-13 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. S. Cafiso, C. D'Agostino, R. Bąk, The Assessment of Road Safety for Passing Relief Lanes Using Microsimulation and Traffic Conflict Analysis, RSS2015 Spec. Issue Adv. Transp. Stud. 2 pp. 55-64 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  12. D. Gettman, L. Pu, T. Sayed, S. Shelby, Surrogate Safety Assessment Model and Validation. Final Report. FHWA-HRT-08-051 (Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2008) [Google Scholar]
  13. M. Brewer, S. Venglar, K. Fitzpatrick, L. Ding, B. Park, Super 2 Highways in Texas. Operational and Safety Characteristics, Transp. Res. Rec. 2301 pp. 46-54 (2012) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. P. Kirby, G. Koorey, B. Wilmshurst, Operating characteristics and economic evaluation of 2+1 lanes with or without intelligent transport systems assisted merging. Research report 549 (NZ Transport Agency, 2014) [Google Scholar]
  15. S. Cafiso, C. D'Agostino, M. Kieć, R. Bak, Safety assessment of passing relief lanes using microsimulation-based conflicts analysis, Accid. Anal. Prev. 116 pp. 94-102 (2018). doi:10.1016/j.aap.2017.07.001 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. PTV AG, User Manual VISSIM 5.10, (2008) [Google Scholar]
  17. C.H. Spiegelman, E.S. Park, L.R. Rilett, Transportation Statistics and Microsimulation (CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, Boca Raton, 2011) [Google Scholar]
  18. S. Cafiso, C. D'Agostino, M. Kiec, Investigating the influence of passing relief lane sections on safety and traffic performance, J. Transp. Heal. 7 pp. 38-47 (2017). doi:10.1016/j.jth.2017.04.012 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. S. Cafiso, C. D'Agostino, B. Persaud, Investigating the influence on safety of retrofitting Italian motorways with barriers meeting a new EU standard, Traffic Inj. Prev. 18 pp. 324-329 (2017). doi:10.1080/15389588.2016.1203424 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Sputnik user manual (Vincenzo Pasquale Giofrè, Università della Calabria, 2011) [Google Scholar]
  21. S. Cafiso, C. D'Agostino, Safety Performance Function for Motorways using Generalized Estimation Equations, Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci. 53 pp. 900-909 (2012). doi:10.1016/J.SBSPRO.2012.09.939 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. E. Hauer, Observational Before-After Studies in Road Safety (Pergamon Press, Elsevier Science Ltd., Oxford, England, 1997) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.