EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 312 (2020) MATEC Web Conf., 312 (2020) 02002 References
Open Access
Issue
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 312, 2020
9th International Conference on Engineering, Project, and Production Management (EPPM2018)
Article Number 02002
Number of page(s) 9
Section Theories and Applications of Project Management
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/202031202002
Published online 03 April 2020
  1. B. Flyvbjerg, M.K.S. Holm S.L. Buhl, What Causes Cost Overrun in Transport Infrastructure Projects? Transp. Rev. 24(1), 3-18 (2004) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. D.D. Ahiaga-Dagbui, S.D. Smith, Rethinking construction cost overruns: cognition, learning and estimation JFMPC 19(1), 38-54 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  3. BIS, Industrial Strategy: Government and Industry in Partnership: Construction 2025, Report number: URN BIS/13/955 (Department for Business, Innovation and Skills, London, 2013) [Google Scholar]
  4. RICS, Can Building Information Modelling (BIM) Support the New Rules Of Measurement (NRM1) (Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors (RICS), London, 2014) [Google Scholar]
  5. B. Succar, Building Information Modelling Framework: A Research and Delivery Foundation for Industry Stakeholders. Automat. Constr. 18(3), 357-375 (2009) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. L. van Berlo, T. Dikkmans, H. Hendriks, D. Spekkink, W. Pel, Benchmark of BIM Performance in the Netherlands, in Proceedings 29th International Conference CIB W78 2012, 17-19 October 2012, Beirut, Lebanon (2012) [Google Scholar]
  7. NIBS, National Building Information Modeling Standard - Version 2.0-Chapter 5.2 Minimum BIM (2012) [Google Scholar]
  8. CIC - Computer Integrated Construction, BIM Planning Guide for Facility Owners: Computer Integrated Construction (Pennsylvania State University, Pennsylvania, 2013) [Google Scholar]
  9. B. Succar, W. Sher, A. Williams, An Integrated Approach to BIM Competency Assessment, Acquisition and Application, Automat. Constr. 35, 174-189 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  10. C. Kam, D. Senaratna, B. McKinney, Y. Xiao, M. Song, The VDC Scorecard: Formulation and Validation. Stanford University: Center for Integrated Facility Engineering (CIFE), CIFE Working Paper WP135 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  11. J. Du, R. Liu, R. Issa, BIM Cloud Score: Benchmarking BIM Performance, J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 140(11), 04014054-64 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  12. B. Giel, R. Issa Framework for Evaluating the BIM Competencies of Building Owners, Comp. Civ. Build. Eng., ASCE, 552-559 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  13. D. Mitchell, 5D BIM: Creating cost certainty and better buildings (RICS Cobra, Las Vegas, Nevada, 2012) [Google Scholar]
  14. N.A.A. Ismail, R. Drogemuller, S. Beazley, R. Owen, A Review of BIM Capabilities for Quantity Surveying Practice, in Proceedings of the 4th International Building Control Conference (IBCC), 7th -8th March 2016, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia (2016) [Google Scholar]
  15. S. Wu, G. Wood, K. Ginige, S.W. Jong, A technical review of BIM based cost estimating in UK quantity surveying practice, standards and tools, ITcon 19, 534-562 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  16. L. Ustinovičius, R. Rasiulis, L. Nazarko, T. Vilutienė, M. Reizgevicius, Innovative research projects in the field of Building Lifecycle Management, Procedia Engineering, 122, 166-171 (2015) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. M. Reizgevicius, L. Ustinovičius, D. Cibulskiene, V. Kutut, L. Nazarko, Promoting Sustainability through Investment in Building Information Modeling (BIM) Technologies: A Design Company Perspective, Sustainability 10(3), 1-22 (2018) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. O.A. Olatunji Views on building information modelling, procurement and contract management, Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Management, Procurement and Law 167(3), 117-126 (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. A. Ashworth, K. Hogg, Willis’s practice and procedure for quantity surveyor, 12th ed. (Blackwell Publishing Ltd., Oxford, 2007) [Google Scholar]
  20. W. Sher, S. Sheratt, A. Williams, R. Gameson, Heading into new virtual environments: what skills do design team members need? J. Inf. Tech. Cons 14, 17-29 (2009) [Google Scholar]
  21. M. Paulk, B. Curtis, M. Chrissis, C. Weber, The Capability Maturity Model for Software (Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, 1993) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. P.B. Crosby, Quality is Free: The Art of Making Quality Certain (New American Library, New York, 1979) [Google Scholar]
  23. R. Eadie, S. Perera, G. Heaney, Key Process Area Mapping in the Production of an E-capability Maturity Model for UK Construction Organisations, JFMPC 16(3), 197-210 (2011) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Succar, B. Building Information Modelling Maturity Matrix. Handbook of Research on Building Information Modeling and Construction Informatics: Concepts and Technologies, IGI, 65-103 (2010) [Google Scholar]
  25. B. Succar, W. Sher, A. Williams, Measuring BIM Performance: Five metrics. Architect. Eng. Des. Manag. 8(2), 120-142 (2012) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. IU, Building Information Modeling (BIM) Guidelines and Standards for Architects, Engineers, and Contractors (Indiana University, USA, 2009) [Google Scholar]
  27. N. Gu, K. London, Understanding and facilitating BIM adoption in the AEC industry, Automat. Constr. 19(8), 988-999 (2010) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. A.M. Mahamadu, L. Mahdjoubi, C. Booth, Critical BIM Qualification Criteria for Construction Pre-Qualification and Selection, Architect. Eng. Des. Manag. 13(5), 326-343 (2017a) [Google Scholar]
  29. A. Azzouz, P. Hill, Hunting for perfection: How Arup measures BIM maturity on projects worldwide, Cons. Res. Innov. 8(2), 49-54 (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. M. Hallowell, J. Gambatese, Qualitative Research: Application of the Delphi Method to CEM Research, J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 136(1), 99-107 (2010) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. D.E. Polkinghorne, Phenomenological research methods, in Existential-phenomenological perspectives in psychology, 41-60 (Springer, 1989) [Google Scholar]
  32. J.W. Creswell, Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing among Five Approaches, 3rd ed. (Sage Publications, London, 2013). [Google Scholar]
  33. A.M. Mahamadu, P. Manu, A. Poghosyan, L. Mahdjoubi, A. Gibb, M. Behm, Organisational attributes that determine design for occupational safety and health capability, in Submitted to CRIOCM 2017 22nd International Conference on Advancement of Construction Management and Real Estate, 20-23 November 2017, Swinburne University of Technology, Australia (2017b) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.