Open Access
MATEC Web of Conferences
Volume 159, 2018
The 2nd International Joint Conference on Advanced Engineering and Technology (IJCAET 2017) and International Symposium on Advanced Mechanical and Power Engineering (ISAMPE 2017)
Article Number 02019
Number of page(s) 6
Section Manufacturing
Published online 30 March 2018
  1. L.T. Staheli, D.E. Chew, M. Corbett, The longitudinal arch. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 69, 426-8 (1987) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. D.H. Van Boerum, B.J. Sangeorzan, Biomechanics and pathophysiology of flat foot. Foot Ankle Clin, 8, 419 (2003) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. A.E. Hunt, R.M. Smith, Mechanics and control of the flat versus normal foot during the stance phase of walking. Clin Biomechanics, 19, 391-7 (Bristol, Avon 2004) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. T. Abolarin, A. Aiyegbusi, A. Tella, Predictive factors for flatfoot: The role of age and footwear in children in urban and rural communities in South West Nigeria. The Foot 21, 188-192 (2011) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. A. Evans, K. Rome, Cochrane review of the evidence for non-surgical interventions for flexible pediatric flat feet. Eur. J. Phys. Rehab. Med, 47, 69-89 (2011) [Google Scholar]
  6. R. Peter, Cavanagh, M.M. Rodgers, The Arch index: a useful measure from footprints, 20(5), 547-551 (J. Biomechanics, 1987) [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. A.J. Hernandez, L.K Kimura, M.H.F Laraya, Calculation of staheli’s plantar arch index and prevalence of flat feet: a study with 100 children aged 5-9 years, 15(2), 68-71 (Acta Ortop Bras, 2007) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. D.B. Wibowo, G.D. Haryadi, A. Widodo, et al, Estimation of calcaneal loading during standing from human footprint depths using 3D scanner. AIP Conf. Proc. 1788, 030063-1-030063-9, doi 10.1063/1.4968316 (Acta Ortop Bras, 2007) [Google Scholar]
  9. R.C Gonzalez, R.E Woods, S.L Eddins, Digital Image Procesing Using MATLAB. 2, (Gatesmark Publishing, A Division of Gatesmark, LLC 2009) [Google Scholar]
  10. R.I. Harris, T. Beath, Army foot survey: an investigation of foot ailments in Canadian soldiers, 116 (1947) [Google Scholar]
  11. PS Igbigbi, BC Msamati, MB Shariff, Arch index as a predictor of pes planus: a comparative study of indigenous Kenyans and Tanzanians. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc, 95(3), 273-6 (2005) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. S. Yucesan, H. Dindar, I. Olcay, H. Okur, S. Kilicaslan, Y. Ergoren, et al, Prevalence of congenital abnormalities in Turkish school children, 9(4), 373-80 (Eur J Epidemiol, 1993) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. B. Alamy, An epidemiologic study of flat foot in Iran, 55(3-4), 78-83 (Tehran Univ Med J, 1997) [Google Scholar]
  14. A.K Reihaneh, F. Aliabadi, Prevalence of flat feet: Comparison between male and female primary school students. Iranian Rehabilitation Journal, 11, 18 (2013) [Google Scholar]
  15. H.H. Hazzaa, G.H. El-Meniaway, S.E. Ahmed, M.B. Bedier, Correlation between gender and age and flat foot in obese children, 10(4), 207-215 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  16. J.H. Chang, C.L. Wang, Y.W. Shen, L.C Hong, Prevalence of flexible flatfoot in Taiwanese school-aged children in relation to obesity, gender and age, 169, 447-452 (2010) [Google Scholar]
  17. Lee, Yu-Chi, Lin, Gloria, J Wang, Mao-Jiun, Comparing 3D foot scanning with conventional measurement method. Journal of Foot and Ankle Research, 7, 44 (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. R. Periyasamy, et al, Preliminary investigation of foot pressure distribution variation in men and women adults while standing, 142 – 148 (The Foot 21, 2011) [Google Scholar]
  19. R.E. Wunderlich, P.R. Cavnagh, Gender differences in adult foot shape: Implications for shoe design, 33, 605-611 (Med. Sci. Sports Exer, 2001) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. R. Stephen, Urry, S.C. Wearing, Comparison of footprint indexes calculated from ink and electronic footprints, 91(4), 203-209 (J Am Podiatr Med Assoc, 2001) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.