Open Access
Issue
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 408, 2025
44th Conference of the International Deep Drawing Research Group (IDDRG 2025)
Article Number 01079
Number of page(s) 4
Section Full Papers
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/202540801079
Published online 07 May 2025
  1. S. Choudhary, A. Mulay, J Mater Eng Perform 33, 3283 (2024). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. V.A. Cristino, J.P. Magrinho, G. Centeno, M.B. Silva, P.A.F. Martins, J Mater Process Technol 287, 116659 (2021) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. J. Jeswiet, D. Young, Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Pt. B J. Eng. Manufact. 219, 359 (2005) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. P. Gupta, A. Szekeres, J. Jeswiet, Int. J. Mater. Form 14, 293 (2021) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. A. Rosa-Sainz, M.L. Garda-Romeu, I. Ferrer, M.B. Silva, G. Centeno, J Manuf Process 86, 66 (2023) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. G. Ambrogio, L. De Napoli, L. Filice, F. Gagliardi, M. Muzzupappa, J Mater Process Technol 162-163, 156 (2005) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. A. Attanasio, E. Ceretti, C. Giardini, S. Antonioni, Key Eng. Mater 473, 929 (2011) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. W. Wang, Q. Guo, Z. Yang, Y. Jiang, J. Xu, Robot Comput Integr Manuf 79, 102436 (2022) [Google Scholar]
  9. H. Meier, R. Laurischkat, J. Zhu, AIP Conf Proc 1315, 1407 (2011) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. H. Meier, B. Buff, R. Laurischkat, V. Smukala, CIRP Annals 58, 233 (2009) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. W.K. Shaker, A. Klimchik, Robot-based Incremental Forming: Springback Effect Compensation Model for Various Materials, in Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Control, Decision and Information Technologies, CoDIT, 1-4 July 2024, Vallette, Malta (2024) [Google Scholar]
  12. S.R. Palwai, S. Bharti, A.K. Tiwari, H. Krishnaswamy, A Novel Method to Design Preform Shape for Robo-forming, in Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Control, Decision and Information Technologies, CoDIT, 1-4 July 2024, Vallette, Malta (2024) [Google Scholar]
  13. M. Slamani, J.F. Chatelain, J Manuf Process 37, 177–195 (2019) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. D. Möllensiep, T. Gorlas, P. Kulessa, B. Kuhlenkötter, Prod. Eng. 15, 683 (2021) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. S.P. Kumar, V.J. Stanley, S. Nimesha, Int. J. Lightweight Mater. Manuf., 8, 165 (2024) [Google Scholar]
  16. J.R. Duflou, B. Callebaut, J. Verbert, H. De Baerdemaeker, CIRP Annals 56, 273 (2007) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. B. Krasowski, A. Kubit, T. Trzepiecinski, J. Slota, Adv. in Mater. Sci. 20, 5 (2020) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. M. Shamsari, M.J. Mirnia, M. Elyasi, H. Baseri, Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 94, 2357 (2018) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. D. Nasulea, G. Oancea, Metals 11, 482 (2021) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. S. Choudhary, A. Mulay, J Mater Eng Perform 33, 3283 (2024) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.