Open Access
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 368, 2022
NEWTECH 2022 – The 7th International Conference on Advanced Manufacturing Engineering and Technologies
Article Number 01018
Number of page(s) 8
Section Advanced Manufacturing Engineering and Technologies
Published online 19 October 2022
  1. Patel, Sumit, Panchotiya, Binal, et Ribadiya, S., A. Survey: Virtual, Augmented and Mixed Reality, Journal of Engineering Research & Technology in Education. IJERT, vol. 9(5), 1067-1072 (2020) [Google Scholar]
  2. Nikhitha Raju, V. P. Joshith, “Augmented Reality in English Language Pedagogy: An Innovative Techno Culture for Contemporary ClassroomsA Meta Review” Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, 29(03), 5957-5968, (2020) [Google Scholar]
  3. Enrico Gandolfi Virtual Reality and Augmented Reality Handbook of Research on K-12 Online and Blended Learning, 2nd ed., 545-561, Publisher: ETC Press Editors: Kennedy, K, Ferdig, R.E, (2018) [Google Scholar]
  4. Plamen Miltenoff, VR, AR and Video 360: A Case Study Towards New Realities in Education, Augmented and Virtual Reality in Libraries, 12, 187-199, Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, (2018) [Google Scholar]
  5. Galaup, M., Phénomènes transpositifs et environnements numériques pour l’apprentissage, Habilitation à diriger des recherches en Sciences de l’Éducation, Université Toulouse 2 Jean Jaurès, France, (2020). [Google Scholar]
  6. Le Boterf, G. (1998). Évaluer les compétences. Quels jugements ? Quels critères ? Quelles instances ? Éducation permanente, 135(2), 143-151, (1998) [Google Scholar]
  7. Tricot, A., Plegat-Soutjis, F., Camps, J. F., Amiel, A., Lutz, G. et Morcillo, A. (2003). Utilité, utilisabilité, acceptabilité : interpréter les relations entre trois dimensions de l’évaluation des EIAH., last accessed 2022/06/14 [Google Scholar]
  8. Auvray Malika, Fuchs Philippe. Perception, immersion et interactions sensorimotrice en environnement virtuel. Intellectica, 45, 2007/1. Virtuel et Cognition, 23-35, (2007) [Google Scholar]
  9. Bangor, A., Kortum, P., & Miller, J.. Determining what individual SUS scores mean: Adding an adjective rating scale. Journal of usability studies, 4(3), 114-123, (2009). [Google Scholar]
  10. Gronier, G. and Baudet, A.. Psychometric evaluation of the F-SUS: Creation and validation of the French version of the System Usability Scale. International Journal of HumanComputer Interaction, Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 37(16), 1571-1582, (2021) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.