Open Access
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 304, 2019
9th EASN International Conference on “Innovation in Aviation & Space”
Article Number 02008
Number of page(s) 8
Section Flight Physics: Noise & Aerodynamics
Published online 17 December 2019
  1. D. P., Raymer, Aircraft Design: A Conceptual Approach, 5th ed., American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Reston, VA, (2012) [Google Scholar]
  2. M. H., Sadraey, Aircraft design: a systems engineering approach, Wiley, Chichester, (2013) [Google Scholar]
  3. M. J., Abzug, E. E., Larrabee, Airplane stability and control: a history of the technologies that made aviation possible, 2nd ed., Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK ; New York, (2002) [Google Scholar]
  4. U.S. Air Force, Waverider,,(n.d.) [Google Scholar]
  5. G., Norris, Skunk Works Reveals SR–71 Successor Plan, Aviation Week & Space Technology,,(n.d.) [Google Scholar]
  6. M., Pätzold, T., Lutz, E., Krämer, S., and Wagner, Numerical optimization of finite shock control bumps, AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, Reno, Nevada, (2006), pp. 12656–12668 [Google Scholar]
  7. M. Kintscher, and H. P., Monner, Structural Concept of an Adaptive Shock Control Bump Spoiler, SAE Tech. Pap. Part F129883 (2017). 10.4271/2017-01-2164 [Google Scholar]
  8. P., Harsha, L., Keel, A. Castrogiovanni, and R. Sherrill, X-43A Vehicle Design and Manufacture, AIAA/CIRA International Space Planes and Hypersonics Systems and Technologies Conference (2005). 10.2514/6.2005-3334 [Google Scholar]
  9. U.S. Standard atmosphere 1976, NASA–TM–X–74335, Washington, (1976) [Google Scholar]
  10. J., Kirz, and R., Rudnik, DLR TAU Simulations for the Second AIAA Sonic Boom Prediction Workshop, AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, AIAA AVIATION Forum, Denver, Colorado, (2017). 10.2514/6.2017-3253 [Google Scholar]
  11. J., Kirz, Surrogate Based Shape Optimization of a Low Boom Axisymmetric Body, AIAA Applied Aerodynamics Conference, AIAA AVIATION Forum, Atlanta, Georgia, (2018). doi:10.2514/6.2018-2849 [Google Scholar]
  12. J., Hileman, Z., Spakovszky, M., Drela, and M., Sargeant, Airframe Design for “Silent Aircraft”, AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, NV, (2007) [Google Scholar]
  13. C., Bliamis, P., Panagiotou, and K. Yakinthos, Hypersonic vehicle control concept using an active shock bump technique, AIAA International Space Planes and Hypersonic Systems and Technologies Conference, Orlando, Florida, (2018) [Google Scholar]
  14. Ames research staff, Equations, tables, and charts for compressible flow, NACA–TR–1145, (1953) [Google Scholar]
  15. J. D., Anderson, Hypersonic and high–temperature gas dynamics, 2nd ed., American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Reston, Va, (2006) [Google Scholar]
  16. L. Roy, Analysis and Synthesis of Four–Bar Mechanism, (2008) [Google Scholar]
  17. S. D., Castellanos, A. J., Cavaleiro, A. M. P. D., Jesus, R., Neto, & J. L., Alves, Machinability of titanium aluminides: A review, Proc. of the Inst. of Mech. Eng., Part L: Journal of Materials: Design and Applications, 233(3), 426–451, (2019) [Google Scholar]
  18. D.R., Tenney, W. B., Lisagor, & S. C., Dixon, (1991). October 1988. Material and Structures for Hypersonic Vehicles, NASA Technical Memorandum. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.