Open Access
Issue
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 300, 2019
ICMFF12 - 12th International Conference on Multiaxial Fatigue and Fracture
Article Number 02003
Number of page(s) 13
Section Keynote
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201930002003
Published online 02 December 2019
  1. M. Lemaire, Structural Reliability, 1st edn.(Wiley-ISTE, 2009) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. C. Roux, X. Lorang, H. Maitournam, M.L. Nguyen-Tajan, Fatigue design of railway wheels: a probabilistic approach, Fatigue&Fracture of Engineering Materials&Structures 37, 1136 (2014), fFEMS-5471.R3 [Google Scholar]
  3. P. Tibbits, Fatigue Load Equivalent to Distribution of Loads From the US Population, in ASME 2007 International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference (2007) [Google Scholar]
  4. G. Freebury, W. Musial, Determining Equivalent Damage Loading for Full-Scale Wind Turbine Blade Fatigue Tests February 2000 NREL / CP-500-27510, in 19th American Society of Mechanical Engineers(ASME)Wind Energy Symposium (Reno, Nevada, 2000) [Google Scholar]
  5. B. Echard, N. Gayton, A. Bignonnet, A reliability analysis method for fatigue design, International Journal of Fatigue 59, 292 (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. M. Matsuishi, T. Endo, Fatigue of metals subjected to varying stress, Tech. rep., Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers, Fukuoka, Japan (1968) [Google Scholar]
  7. H. Hendriks, B.H. Bulder, Fatigue equivalent load cycle method -ageneral method to compare the fatigue loading of different load spectrums, Tech.Rep. ECN-C–95-074, ECN (1995) [Google Scholar]
  8. J. Thomas, G. Perroud, A. Bignonnet, D. Monnet, in Fatigue Design and Reliability, edited by G. Marquis, J. Solin (Elsevier, 1999), Vol. 23of European Structural Integrity Society, pp.1–11 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. A. Halfpenny, Accelerated vibration testing based on fatigue damage spectra (2006) [Google Scholar]
  10. C. Lalanne, Mechanical Vibration & Shock: Fatigue damage, Mechanical Vibration & Shock (Hermes Penton Science, 2002) [Google Scholar]
  11. F. Szmytka, A. Oudin, A reliability analysis method in thermo mechanical fatigue design, International Journal of Fatigue 53, 82 (2013), proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Thermo-Mechanical Fatigue 2011 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. M. Köhler, S. Jenne, K. Pötter, H. Zenner, Load assumption for fatigue design of structures and components (Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2017), translation from the German language edition:Zählverfahren und Lastannahme in der Betriebsfestigkeit. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. G. Genet, A statistical approach to multi-input equivalent fatigue loads for the durability of automotive structures, Ph.D. thesis, Chalmers University of Technology and Göteborg University (2006) [Google Scholar]
  14. F. Morel, A critical plane approach for life prediction of high cycle fatigue under multiaxial variable amplitude loading, International Journal of Fatigue 22, 101 (2000) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. C. Roux, X. Lorang, H. Maitournam, M.L. Nguyen-Tajan, B. Quesson, Multi-parameter fatigue equivalence loadings for specification applications, Procedia Engineering 66, 393 (2013), fatigue Design 2013, International Conference Proceedings [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. B. Delattre, Analyse des chargements en service pour le dimensionnement fiabiliste à la fatigue polycyclique, in Colloque Mécamat –Fatigue des structures et des matériaux (Aussois, 2017) [Google Scholar]
  17. B. Weber, C. Montero, S. Bergamo, R. Rennert, A. Wünsche, S. Budano, I. Aranguren, Load spectrum lightening of fatigue tests data for time reduction of design validation Speefat, Tech. Rep. EUR242006, European Commission -Research fund for coal and steel (2010) [Google Scholar]
  18. R. Jossic, Généralisation d’une méthode de construction d’équivalents fatigue multi-entrée, Master’sthesis, École Centrale de Paris (2007) [Google Scholar]
  19. C. Farhat, A. Bos, P. Avery, C. Soize, Modeling and quantification of model-form uncertaintiesin eigenvalue computations using a stochastic reduced model, AIAA Journal 56, 1198 (2018) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.