Open Access
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 290, 2019
9th International Conference on Manufacturing Science and Education – MSE 2019 “Trends in New Industrial Revolution”
Article Number 12015
Number of page(s) 8
Section Safety and Health at Work
Published online 21 August 2019
  1. EUROCONTROL, Modèles de sécurité appliqués au contrôle du trafic aérien: comprendre le métier de contrôleur, Intermediate report, Eurocontrol Brétigny–sur–Orge, May (2001) [Google Scholar]
  2. Chaboud et al. Air Traffic Complexity: Potential Impacts on Workload and Cost. EEC Note 11/00. 2000. EUROCONTROL (2000) [Google Scholar]
  3. Wise, V.D. Hopkin and M.L. Smith (eds.): Automation and systems issues in air traffic control, NATO ASI Series, F73, Berlin, Springer-Verlag, pp. 267-280 (1991) [Google Scholar]
  4. Hitchcock L., The FAA approach to human factors, in David H. (ed.): European Group for Human Factors in Air Traffic Control, Task AT27, EEC Note 19/92 (Bretigny-sur-Orge, EUROCONTROL (1992) [Google Scholar]
  5. Arad, B.A. The controller load and sector design. Journal of Air Traffic Control, pp. 12-31 (1964) [Google Scholar]
  6. Zeier H. et al., Enquête sur le stress auprès des contrôleurs du trafic aérien de swisscontrol, Zürich, Haupt, November (1990) [Google Scholar]
  7. McCracken, J. H., Aldrich, T. B. Analyses of selected LHX mission functions: implications for operator workload and system automation goals (ASI479-024-84), Fort Rucker: Army Research Field Institute (1984) [Google Scholar]
  8. Wickens, C. D., Hollands, J. G. Engineering psychology and human performance (3rd ed.), Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall (2000) [Google Scholar]
  9. Redding, R.E. Analysis of operational errors and workload in air traffic control. In Proceedings of the Human Factors Society 36th Annual Meeting, pp. 1321-1325, (1992) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Majumdar, A., Ochieng, W.Y. The factors affecting air traffic controller workload: a multivariate analysis based upon simulation modelling of controller workload, Centre for Transport Studies, Imperial College, London, (2000) [Google Scholar]
  11. Halford, G. S., Wilson, W. H., & Phillips, S. Processing capacity defined by relational complexity: Implications for comparative, developmental, and cognitive psychology. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21 (6), pp. 803–831 (1998) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Mogford, R.H., Murphy, E.D. & Guttman, J.A. The use of direct and indirect techniques to study airspace complexity factors in air traffic control. Proceedings of the First Mid-Atlantic Human Factors Conference, pp. 196-202, Norfolk, Virginia: Old Dominion University (1993) [Google Scholar]
  13. Cabon P., Molard R., Objective evaluation of physiological behaviour and workload of controllers, Paris, Eurocontrol EEC report 339 (1999) [Google Scholar]
  14. Hurst M.W., Rose R.M. Objective workload and behavioural response in airport radar control rooms, in Ergonomics, 21 (7), pp. 559-565 (1978) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Sperandio J.C. The regulation of working methods as a function of work-load among air traffic controllers, in Ergonomics, 21(3), 1978, pp. 195-202 (1978) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Pelz J.B., Canosa R., Babcock J. & Barber J., Visual Perception in Familiar, Complex Tasks, Proceedings of the ICIP 2001, Oct. 2001 Thessaloniki, Greece (2001) [Google Scholar]
  17. International Organization for Standardization, ISO 10075-3/2004 - Ergonomic principles regarding the effort in mental activity. Principles and requirements for methods of measuring and assessing the effort in mental activity (2004) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.