Open Access
Issue
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 258, 2019
International Conference on Sustainable Civil Engineering Structures and Construction Materials (SCESCM 2018)
Article Number 01012
Number of page(s) 8
Section Green Construction Materials and Technologies, Environmental Impact and Green Design, Local and Recycled Materials
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201925801012
Published online 25 January 2019
  1. D. R. Morgan, Compatibility of concrete repair materials and systems, Construction and Building Materials, 10, 57–67, (1996) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Tianming Gao, Lei Shen, Ming Shen, Litao Liu, Fengnan Chen, Analysis of material flow and consumption in cement production, Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, 553–556, (2016) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. J. Davidovits, GEOPOLYMERS Inorganic polymeric new materials, Journal of Thermal Analysis, 37, 1633–1656, (1991) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Xiaolu Guo, Huisheng Shi, Warren A. Dick, Compressive strength and microstructural characteristics of class C fly ash geopolymer, Cement & Concrete Composites, 32, 142–147, (2010) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Jae Eun Oh, Paulo J. M. Monteiro, Ssang Sun Jun, Sejin Choi, Simon M. Clark, The evolution of strength and crystalline phases for alkali-activated ground blast furnace slag and fly ash-based geopolymers, Cement and Concrete Research, 40, 189–196, (2010) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Keun-Hyeok Yang, Jin-Kyu Song, Keum-ll Song, Assessment of CO2 reduction of alkali-activated concrete, Journal of Cleaner Production, 39, 265–272, (2013) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. A. Fernandez-Jimenez, I. Garcia-Lodeiro, A. Palomo, Durability of alkali-activated fly ash cementitious materials, Journal of Materials Science, 42, 3055–3065, (2007) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. T. Bakharev, Resistance of geopolymer materials to acid attack, Cement and Concrete Research, 35, 658–670, (2005) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. T. W. Cheng, J. P. Chiu, Fire-resistant geopolymer produced by granulated blast furnace slag, Minerals Engineering, 16, 205–210, (2003) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Zuhua Zhang, Xiao Yao, Huajun Zhu, Potential application of geopolymers as protection coatings for marine concrete II. Microstructure and anticorrosion mechanism, Applied Clay Science, 49, 7–12, (2010) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Yuta Igarashi, Sanjay PAREEK, Effects of Slag Replacement Ratio and Curing Condition on the Compressive Strength of Geopolymer Mortars Using Fly Ash from India and Japan, Proceedings of the Japan Concrete Institute (Japanese), 37, 1885–1890, (2015) [Google Scholar]
  12. Yuta Igarashi, Sanjay PAREEK, Resistance to high concentration of hydrochloric acid solution by geopolymer mortars using fly ash and electric arc furnace slag, Proceedings of the Japan Concrete Institute (Japanese), 38, 2319–2324, (2016) [Google Scholar]
  13. Hiroo Kashima, Sanjay PAREEK, Ippei Maruyama, Yoshikazu Araki, Effect of releasing agent on debonding behavior between geopolymer mortar and steel plate, Proceedings of the Japan Concrete Institute (Japanese), 39, 1351–1356, (2017) [Google Scholar]
  14. Fernando Pacheco-Torgal, J. P. Castro-Gomes, Said Jalali, Adhesion characterization of tungsten mine waste geopolymeric binder. Influence of OPC concrete substrate surface treatment, Construction and Building Materials, 22, 154–161, (2008) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Smith Songpiriyakij, Tawich Pulngern, Pompong Pungpremtrakul, Chai Jaturapitakkul, Anchorage of steel bars in concrete by geopolymer paste, Materials and Design, 32, 3021–3028, (2011) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Tanakorn Phoo-ngernkham, Vanchai Sata, Sakonwan Hanjitsuwan, Charoenchai Ridtirud, Shigemitsu Hatanaka, Prinya Chindaprasirt, High calcium fly ash geopolymer mortar containing Portland cement for use as repair materials, Construction and Building Materials, 98, 482–488, (2015) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Yifei Cui, Obada Kayali, Tiejun Zhao and Chunwei Zhang, Bond Strength of Steel Bar and Plain of Fiber Reinforced Geopolymer Concrete, The 2017 World Congress on Advances in Structure Engineering and mechanics (ASEM17), (2017) [Google Scholar]
  18. Caroline Talbot, Michel Pigeon, Denis Beaupre and D. R. Morgan, Influence of Surface Preparation on Long-Term Bonding of Shotcrete, ACIMaterials Journal, 91, 560–566, (1994) [Google Scholar]
  19. A. Momayez, M. R. Ehsani, A. A. Ramezanianpour, H. Rajaie, Comparison of methods for evaluating bond strength between concrete substrate and repair materials, Cement and Concrete Research, 35, 748–757, (2005) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Eduardo N. B. S. Julio, Fernando A. B. Branco, Vitor D. Silva, Concrete-to-concrete bond strength. Influence of the roughness of the substrate surface, Construction and Building Materials, 18, 675–681, (2004) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Shu Ota, Yasutake Sagawa, Koji Harada, Takeyoshi Nishizaki, A fundamental study on bond strength properties of geopolymer mortar, Proceedings of the Japan Concrete Institute (Japanese), 38, 2313–2318, (2016) [Google Scholar]
  22. Arnaud Castel, Stephen J. Foster, Bond strength between blended slag and Class F fly ash geopolymer concrete with steel reinforcement, Cement and Concrete Research, 72, 48–53, (2015) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Kosuke Minami, Taku Matsubayashi, Hideyuki Kajita, Takatsune Sato, Study on Structural Use for Geopolymer Concrete, Proceeding of JCI Symposium on Current Status and Issues of Geopolymer Technology in the Construction Sector (Japanese), 99–102, (2016) [Google Scholar]
  24. Pre De Silva, Kwesi Sagoe-Crenstil, Medium-term phase stability of Na2O-Al2O3-SiO2-H2O geopolymer systems, Cement and Concrete Research, 38, 870–876, (2008) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. Katsuhiro NAGATOMO, Tetsuzo KAKU, Study on bond characteristics of deformed bars with only a single transverse rib, Japan Society of Civil Engineers (Japanese), 372, 177–186, (1986) [Google Scholar]
  26. Zuhua Zhang, Xiao Yao, Huajun Zhu, Potential application of geopolymers as protection coatings for marine concrete 1. Basic properties, Applied Clay Science, 49, 1–6, (2010) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.