Open Access
Issue
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 213, 2018
2018 6th Asia Conference on Mechanical and Materials Engineering (ACMME 2018)
Article Number 01012
Number of page(s) 5
Section Mechanical Manufacturing and Automation
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201821301012
Published online 15 October 2018
  1. M. Annoni, H. Gilberti,M. Strano. (2016). Feasibility Study of an Extrusion-based Direct Metal Additive Manufacturing Technique. 44th Proceedings of the North American Manufacturing Research Institution of SME http://www.sme.org/namrc. Volume 5, 2016, Pages 916–927. [Google Scholar]
  2. Shannon E. Bakarich, R. Gorkin III, R. Gately, S. Naficy, Marc in het Panhuis, Geoffrey M. Spinks. (2017). 3D printing of tough hydrogel composites with spatially varying materials properties. Additive Manufacturing 14 (2017) 24–30. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Teresa F. Wegrzyn, Matt Golding, Richard H. Archer. (2012). Food Layered Manufacture: A new process for constructing solid foods. Trends in Food Science & Technology 27 (2012) 66–72. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. J.Y. Lee, Jia An, Chee Kai Chua. (2017). Fundamentals and applications of 3D printing for novel materials. Applied Materials Today 7 (2017) 120–133. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Nguyen, Tuan C. “Hungry? A Startup Wants You to 3D Print Your Next Meal.” http://www.smithsonianmag.com/innovation/hungry-a-startup-wants-you-to-3d-print-your-next-meal-180947702/ (accessed September 18, 2017). [Google Scholar]
  6. Jayakuma, Amrita. “Home-Baked Idea? Nasa mulls 3D printers for food replication.” The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2013/jun/04/nasa-3d-printer-space-food (accessed September 18, 2017). [Google Scholar]
  7. New technology often builds on old technology. Understanding how the present printers work and discovering their advantages and disadvantages may help people create more useful food printers in the future. [Google Scholar]
  8. F. Yang, M. Zhang, B. Bhandari,Y. Liud. (2018). Investigation on lemon juice gel as food material for 3D printing and optimization of printing parameters. LWT Food Science and Technology Volume 87, January 2018, Pages 67–76 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. L. Wang, M. Zhanga, B. Bhandari,C. Yangd. (2018). Investigation on fish surimi gel as promising food material for 3D printing. Journal of Food Engineering Volume 220, March 2018, Pages 101–108 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. M. Lanar, David P. Forrestal, S Scheurer, Damien J. Slinger, S. Liao, S. K. Powell, Maria A. Woodruff. (2017). 3D printing complex chocolate objects: Platform design, optimization and evaluation. Journal of Food Engineering Volume 215, December 2017, Pages 13–22 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Fernanda C. Godoi, Sangeeta Prakash, Bhesh R. Bhandari. (2016). 3D printing technologies applied for food design: Status and prospects. Journal of Food Engineering Volume 179, June 2016, Pages 44–54 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Z. Liu, M. Zhang, B. Bhandari,Y. Wang. (2017). 3D printing: Printing precision and application in food sector. Trends in Food Science & Technology Volume 69, Part A, November 2017, Pages 83–94 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. H. Miyanaji, N. Momenzadeh,L. Yanga. (2018). Effect of printing speed on quality of printed parts in Binder Jetting Process. Additive Manufacturing Volume 20, March 2018, Pages 1–10 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. J. Sun, Z. Peng, W. Zhou, Jerry Y.H. Fuh, G. Soon Hong, A. Chiu. (2015). A Review on 3D Printing for Customized Food Fabrication. Procedia Manufacturing Volume 1, 2015, Pages 308–319 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. S. Holland, T. Foster, W. MaNaughtan,C. Tuck. (2018). Design and characterisation of food grade powders and inks for microstructure control using 3D printing. Journal of Food Engineering Volume 220, March 2018, Pages 12–19 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.