Open Access
Issue
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 202, 2018
2018 International Conference on Aeronautical, Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering (AAME 2018)
Article Number 02006
Number of page(s) 7
Section Mechanical Design Manufacturing and Automation
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201820202006
Published online 26 September 2018
  1. Ezugwu, E. O. 2005. “Key Improvements in the Machining of Difficult-to-Cut Aerospace Superalloys.” International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture 45 (12-13): 1353–1367 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Dudzinski, D., A. Devillez, A. Moufki, D. Larrouquère, V. Zerrouki, and J. Vigneau. 2004. “A Review of Developments Towards Dry and High Speed Machining of Inconel 718 Alloy.” International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture 44 (4): 439–456 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Ulutan, Durul, and Tugrul Ozel. 2011. “Machining Induced Surface Integrity in Titanium and Nickel Alloys: A Review.” International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture 51 (3): 250–280 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Fang, Ning, P. Srinivasa Pai, and S. Mosquea. “Effect of tool edge wear on the cutting forces and vibrations in high-speed finish machining of Inconel 718: an experimental study and wavelet transform analysis.” The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 52, no. 1 (2011): 65–77. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Pervaiz, Salman, Amir Rashid, Ibrahim Deiab, and Mihai Nicolescu. 2014. “Influence of Tool Materials on Machinability of Titaniumand Nickel-Based Alloys: A Review.” Materials and Manufacturing Processes 29 (3): 219–252 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Jawaid, A., S. Koksal, and S. Sharif. 2001. “Cutting Performance and Wear Characteristics of Pvd Coated and Uncoated Carbide Tools in Face Milling Inconel 718 Aerospace Alloy.” Journal of Materials Processing Technology 116 (1): 2–9 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Zhang, S., J. F. Li, and Y. W. Wang. 2012. “Tool Life and Cutting Forces in End Milling Inconel 718 under Dry and Minimum Quantity Cooling Lubrication Cutting Conditions.” Journal of Cleaner Production 32: 81–87. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hadi, M. A., J. A. Ghani, C. H. Che Haron, and M. S. Kasim. 2013. “Comparison between up-Milling and Down-Milling Operations on Tool Wear in Milling Inconel 718.” Procedia Engineering 68: 647–653 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Zhang, S., J. F. Li, and Y. W. Wang. 2012. “Tool Life and Cutting Forces in End Milling Inconel 718 under Dry and Minimum Quantity Cooling Lubrication Cutting Conditions.” Journal of Cleaner Production 32: 81–87. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Taylor, Fred W. “The Art of Cutting Metals.” Scientific American 63 (1907): 25942–44. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Wiercigroch, Marian, and Erhan Budak. “Sources of Nonlinearities, Chatter Generation and Suppression in Metal Cutting.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences 359, no. 1781 (2001): 663–93. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Altintas, Yusuf. Manufacturing Automation: Metal Cutting Mechanics, Machine Tool Vibrations, and CNC Design. Cambridge university press, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  13. Quintana, Guillem, and Joaquim Ciurana. 2011. “Chatter in Machining Processes: A Review.” International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture 51 (5): 363–376. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Tobias, SA, and W Fishwick. “Theory of Regenerative Machine Tool Chatter.” The engineer 205, no. 7 (1958): 199–203. [Google Scholar]
  15. Sisson, Timothy Raymond, and Richard L Kegg. “An Explanation of Low-Speed Chatter Effects.” Journal of Engineering for Industry 91, no. 4 (1969): 951–58. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Slavicek, Jan. 1965. “The Effect of Irregular Tooth Pitch on Stability of Milling” Proc. of the 6th Int. MTDR [Google Scholar]
  17. Shirase (1996) Cutting force and dimensional surface error generation in peripheral milling with variable pitch helical end mills. Int J Mach Tool Manuf 36(5):567–584 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Altıntaş, Y., S. Engin and E. Budak. “Analytical Stability Prediction and Design of Variable Pitch Cutters.” Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering 121, no. 2 (1999): 173–78. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Huang, Panling, Jianfeng Li, Jie Sun, and Maojie Ge. 2012. “Milling Force Vibration Analysis in High-Speed Milling Titanium Alloy Using Variable Pitch Angle Mill.” The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing [Google Scholar]
  20. Sellmeier, V, and B Denkena. “Stable Islands in the Stability Chart of Milling Processes Due to Unequal Tooth Pitch.” International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture 51, no. 2 (2011): 152–64. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Comak, Alptunc, and Erhan Budak. “Modeling Dynamics and Stability of Variable Pitch and Helix Milling Tools for Development of a Design Method to Maximize Chatter Stability.” Precision Engineering 47 (2017): 459–68. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Denkena, B., and D. Biermann. “Cutting Edge Geometries.” CIRP Annals Manufacturing Technology 63, no. 2 (2014): 631–53. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Endres, William J., and Raja K. Kountanya. “The Effects of Corner Radius and Edge Radius on Tool Flank Wear.” Journal of Manufacturing Processes 4, no. 2 (2002/01/01/ 2002): 89–96. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Gurdal, Ozan, Erdem Ozturk, and Neil D. Sims. “Analysis of Process Damping in Milling.” Procedia CIRP 55, no. Supplement C (2016/01/01/ 2016): 152–57. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. Yusoff, AhmadR, Sam Turner, ChrisM Taylor, and NeilD Sims. “The Role of Tool Geometry in Process Damped Milling.” The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 50, no. 9-12 (2010/10/01 2010): 883–95. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. Albrecht, Paul. “New Developments in the Theory of the Metal-Cutting Process: Part I. The Ploughing Process in Metal Cutting.” Journal of engineering for industry 82, no. 4 (1960): 348–57. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. Wyen, C-F, and Konrad Wegener. “Influence of Cutting Edge Radius on Cutting Forces in Machining Titanium.” CIRP annals 59, no. 1 (2010): 93–96. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.