Open Access
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 197, 2018
The 3rd Annual Applied Science and Engineering Conference (AASEC 2018)
Article Number 03002
Number of page(s) 6
Section Computer Science
Published online 12 September 2018
  1. U. A. Chaeruman, B. Wibawa, and Z. Syahrial, “Determining the Appropriate Blend of Blended Learning: A Formative Research in the Context of Spada-Indonesia,” vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 188-195, (2018) [Google Scholar]
  2. R. Boelens, M. Voet, and B. De Wever, “The design of blended learning in response to student diversity in higher education: Instructors’ views and use of differentiated instruction in blended learning,” Comput. Educ., vol. 120, no. May 2018, pp. 197-212, (2018) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. R. Kumar and N. Pande, “ScienceDirect Technology-mediated learning paradigm and the blended learning ecosystem: what works for working professionals ?,” Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 122, pp. 1114-1123, (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. P. Kharb and P. P. Samanta, “Journal of the Anatomical Society of India Blended learning approach for teaching and learning anatomy: Students ’ and teachers ’ perspective,” Indian J. Rheumatol., vol. 65, no. 1, pp. 43-47, (2016) [Google Scholar]
  5. E. Coyne, V. Frommolt, H. Rands, V. Kain, and M. Mitchell, “NU SC,” Nurse Educ. Today, vol. 66, no. July 2018, pp. 96-102, (2018) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. H. M. Vo, C. Zhu, and N. A. Diep, “Studies in Educational Evaluation The effect of blended learning on student performance at course-level in higher education: A meta-analysis,” Stud. Educ. Eval., vol. 53, pp. 17-28, (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. H. El-deghaidy and A. Nouby, “Effectiveness of a blended e-learning cooperative approach in an Egyptian teacher education programme,” Comput. Educ., vol. 51, no. 2008, pp. 988-1006, (2008) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. S. Hubackova and I. Semradova, “Evaluation of Blended Learning,” Procedia-Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 217, no. 2016, pp. 551-557, (2016) [Google Scholar]
  9. S. D. Aji, M. N. Hudha, C. Huda, A. B. D. Nandiyanto, and A. G. Abdullah, “The Improvement Of Learning Effectiveness In The Lesson Study By Using E-Rubric,” J. Eng. Sci. Technol., vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 1181-1189, (2018) [Google Scholar]
  10. B. F. Klimova and P. Poulova, “Tutor as an important e-learning support,” Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 3, pp. 1485-1489, (2011) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. T. Krasnova and M. Demeshko, “Tutor-mediated Support in Blended Learning,” Procedia-Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 166, pp. 404-408, (2015) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. U. A. Chaeruman and S. Maudiarti, “Jurnal Pembelajaran Inovatif Quadrant of Blended Learning: a Proposed Conceptual Model for Designing Effective Blended Learning,” vol. 1, no. 4, pp. 1-5, (2018) [Google Scholar]
  13. C. A. Warden, J. O. Stanworth, J. Biao, and A. R. Warden, “Computers & Education Synchronous learning best practices: An action research study,” Comput. Educ., vol. 63, pp. 197-207, (2013) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. M. Bower, B. Dalgarno, G. E. Kennedy, and M. J. W. Lee, “Design and Implementation Factors in Blended Synchronous Learning Environments: Outcomes from a Cross-Case Analysis,” Comput. Educ., vol. 86, pp. 1-17, (2015) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. M. Mehri and M. Uplane, “Synchronous and asynchronous e-learning styles and academic performance of e-learners,” Procedia-Soc. Behav. Sci., vol. 176, pp. 129-138, (2015) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.