Open Access
MATEC Web of Conferences
Volume 180, 2018
13th International Conference Modern Electrified Transport – MET’2017
Article Number 01004
Number of page(s) 5
Section Modern Electrified Transport - Invited Papers
Published online 27 July 2018
  1. European Environment Agency, “Transport in Europe: key facts and trends,” Copenhagen, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  2. The European Union; European Commission, EU transport in figures 2016, (Luxembourg: Publications office of the European Union, 2016). [Google Scholar]
  3. N. Jimenez-Redondo, N. Bosso, L. Zeni, A. Minardo, F. Schubert, F. Heinicke and A. Simroth, “Automated and Cost Effective Maintenance for Railway (ACEM-Rail),” Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, vol. 48, pp. 1058-1067, 2012. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. W. Klöpffer, Ed., Background and Future Prospects in Life Cycle Assessment, Dordrecht: (Springer Netherlands, 2014.) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. M. Hauschild, J. Jeswiet and L. Alting, “From Life Cycle Assessment to Sustainable Production: Status and Perspectives,” in CIRP Annal - Manufacturing Technology, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  6. H. Duan, M. Hu, Y. Zhang, J. Wang, W. Jiang, Q. Huang and J. Li, “Quantification of carbon emissions of the transport service sector in China by using streamlined life cycle assessment,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 95, pp. 109-116, 5 2015. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. A. Merchan Arribas, S. Belboom and A. Léonard, “Environmental impact assessment of rail freight intermodality,” Current issues in transportation research-Proceedings of the BIVEC/GIBET transport research days 2015, pp. 77-85, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  8. N. Fries and S. Hellweg, “LCA of land-based freight transportation: facilitating practical application and including accidents in LCIA,” The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, vol. 19, pp. 546-557, 3 2014. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. M. Banar and A. Özdemir, “An evaluation of railway passenger transport in Turkey using life cycle assessment and life cycle cost methods,” Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, vol. 41, pp. 88-105, 12 2015. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. F. Del Pero, M. Delogu, M. Pierini and D. Bonaffini, “Life Cycle Assessment of a heavy metro train,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 87, pp. 787-799, 1 2015. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. H. Jones, F. Moura and T. Domingos, “Life cycle assessment of high-speed rail: a case study in Portugal,” The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 8 2016. [Google Scholar]
  12. ISO, “ISO 14025:2006. Environmental labels and declarations - Type III environmental declarations -Principles and procedures.,” Geneva. Switzerland, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  13. ISO, “ISO 14040:2006. Environmental management - Life cycle assessment - Principles and framework.,” Geneva. Switzerland, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  14. European Commission - Joint Research Centre -Institute for Environment and Sustainability, “The international Reference Life Cycle Data System (ILCD) Handbook - General guide for Life Cycle Assessment - Provisions and action steps,” (Publications Office of the European Union, Luxemburg, 2010). [Google Scholar]
  15. EPD, “Product Category Rules According to ISO 14025:2006. Product Group: UN CPC 495 - Rolling Stock, 2009:05 - Version 2.11. 2014.,” 2009. [Google Scholar]
  16. J. B. Guinée, Handbook on life cycle assessment: operational guide to the ISO standards, Dordrecht; Boston: (Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2002). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.