EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 251 (2018) MATEC Web Conf., 251 (2018) 05011 References
Open Access
Issue
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 251, 2018
VI International Scientific Conference “Integration, Partnership and Innovation in Construction Science and Education” (IPICSE-2018)
Article Number 05011
Number of page(s) 8
Section Management in Construction
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201825105011
Published online 14 December 2018
  1. Afanasev V.A., Afanasev A.V. Stream scheduling of works in civil engineering. St. Petersburg (in Russian). 2000. [Google Scholar]
  2. Arditi D., Tokdemir O.B. & Suh K. Scheduling system for repetitive unit construction using line-of-balance technology. Scheduling system for repetitive unit construction using line-of-balance technology. Department of Civil and Architectural Engineering, Illinois Institute of Technology, Department of Civil Engineering, Honan University, Honam, South Korea. 433–446. 2001. [Google Scholar]
  3. Faghihi S. V., Nejat A., Reinschmidt K., Kang J.H. Automation in construction scheduling: a review of the literature. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology 81(9), 2015. [Google Scholar]
  4. Goldratt E.M. Critical Chain. Great Barrington, MA: The North River Press. 1997. [Google Scholar]
  5. Hamerlink D. J., Rowings J. E. Linear scheduling model: Development of controlling activity path. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 124(4), 266–268. 1998. [Google Scholar]
  6. Harris R. B. and Ioannou P.G. Scheduling Projects with Repeating Activities. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management. ASCE, Vol. 124, No. 4, pp.269–278. 1998. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Hegazy T. Optimization of construction time –cost trade-off analisys using genetic algorithms. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 26: 685–697. 1999. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Hejducki Z. Sprzężenia czasowe w metodach organizacji złożonych procesów budowlanych. Monografie, WPWr. 2000. [Google Scholar]
  9. Hejducki Z., Rogalska M. Metody sprzężeń czasowych TCM. Przegląd budowlany 2/2005, 38–45. 2005. [Google Scholar]
  10. Hejducki Z., Rogalska M. Time coupling methods. Construction scheduling and time/cost optimization. Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Wrocławskiej. 2011. [Google Scholar]
  11. Hejducki Z., Rogalska M. Harmonogramowanie procesów budowlanych metodami sprzężeń czasowych. Monografie, Politechnika Lubelska. 2017. [Google Scholar]
  12. Johnston D.W. Linear scheduling methods for highway construction. J. Constr. Div., ASCE, 107(C02), 247–261. 1981. [Google Scholar]
  13. Lucko G. Flexible Modeling of Linear Schedules for Integrated Mathematical Analysis. Proceedings of the 2007 39th Winter Simulation Conference, eds. Henderson, S. G., Biller, B., Hsieh, M.-H., Shortle, J., Tew, J. D., Barton, R. R., Washington, District of Columbia, December 9-12, 2007, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Piscataway, New Jersey, 2159–2167. 2007. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Lucko G. Productivity Scheduling Method Compared to Linear and Repetitive Project Scheduling Methods. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management 134(9): 711–720. 2008. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Lucko G. Productivity Scheduling Method: Linear Schedule Analysis with Singularity Functions. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management 135(4): 246–253. 2009. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Marcinkowski R. Metody rozdziału zasobów realizatora w działalności inżynieryjno – budowlanej. Warszawa, WAT. 2002. [Google Scholar]
  17. Mrozowicz J. Methods of organizing construction activities taking into account time couplings. (in Polish), Wrocław University of Technology Publishing House. 1997. [Google Scholar]
  18. Połoński M. Application of the work breakdown structure in determining cost buffers in construction schedules. Archives of Civil Engineering. Volume LXI, Issue 1/2015, Pages 147–161, DOI: 10.1515/ace-2015-0010. 2015. [Google Scholar]
  19. Rogalska M., Bożejko W., Hejducki Z. Time/cost optimization using hybrid evolutionary algorithm in construction project scheduling. Automation in Construction 18, 24–31. 2008. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Turkan Y., Bosche F., Haas C. T., Haas R. Automated progress tracking using 4D schedule and 3D sensing technologies. Automation in Construction Vol.22, pP. 414–421, 2012. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.