EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 250 (2018) MATEC Web Conf., 250 (2018) 01005 References
Open Access
Issue
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 250, 2018
The 12th International Civil Engineering Post Graduate Conference (SEPKA) – The 3rd International Symposium on Expertise of Engineering Design (ISEED) (SEPKA-ISEED 2018)
Article Number 01005
Number of page(s) 9
Section Geotechnical Engineering
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201825001005
Published online 11 December 2018
  1. Shalabi, F. I., Cording, E. J. and Paul, S. L. Concrete segment tunnel lining sealant performance under earthquake loading. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology. 31: 51–60. (2012). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Son, M. and Cording, E.J. Ground-liner interaction in rock tunneling. Tunneling and Underground Space Technology. 22: 1–9. (2007). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Shahrour, I., Khoshnoudian, F., Sadek, M. and Mroueh, H. Elastoplastic analysis of the seismic response of tunnels in soft soils. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology. 25(4): 478–482. (2010). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Hudoba, I, Contribution to Static Analysis of Load-bearing Concrete Tunnel Lining Built by Shield-driven Technology. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology. 12(1): 55–58. (1997). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Blom, C. B. M., van der Horst, E. J., and Jovanovic, P. S. Three-dimensional Structural Analyses of The Shield-Driven “ Green Heart” Tunnel of The High-Speed Line South. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology. 14(2): 217–224. (1999). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Klappers, C., Grübl, F., Ostermeier, B. Structural Analyses of Segmental Lining − Coupled Beam and Spring Analyses versus 3D FEM Calculations with Shell Elements. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology. 21(3-4): 254-255. (2006). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Teachavorasinskun, S. and Chub-uppakarn, T. Influence of segmental joints on tunnel lining. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology. 25(4): 490–494. (2010). [Google Scholar]
  8. Arnau, O. and Molins, C. Three Dimensional Structural Response of Segmental Tunnel Linings. Engineering Structures, 44, 210–221. (2012). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Do, N. A., Dias, D., Oreste, P. and Djeran-Maigre, I. 2D Numerical Investigation of Segmental Tunnel Lining Behavior. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology. 37: 115–127. (2013a). [Google Scholar]
  10. Do, N.-A., Dias, D., Oreste, P. and Djeran-Maigre, I. Three-dimensional Numerical Simulation for Mechanized Tunnelling in Soft Ground: The Influence of The Joint Pattern. Acta Geotechnica, 9(4): 673–694. (2013b). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Yanzhi, Y., Weiwei, Z., Jianwei, W. and Zhihao, Y. Three-dimensional orthotropic equivalent modelling method of large-scale circular jointed lining. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology. 44: 33–41. (2014). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Xiaochun, Z., Wei, Z., Zhengrong, H. and Yuewang, H. Effect of joint structure on joint stiffness for shield tunnel lining. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology. 21(3-4): 407–408. (2006). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Koyama, Y. (2003). Present status and technology of shield tunneling method in Japan. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 18(2-3), 145–159. doi:10.1016/S0886-7798(03)00040-3 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Blom, C. B. M. Design Philosophy of Concrete Linings for Tunnels in Soft Soils Ph.D. Thesis. Delft University, Netherlands. (2002). [Google Scholar]
  15. El Naggar, H. and Hinchberger, S. D. An Analytical Solution for Jointed Tunnel Linings in Elastic Soil or Rock. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 45(11): 1572–1593. (2008). [Google Scholar]
  16. Peck, R. B., Hendron, A.J. and Mohraz, B., State of the art of soft ground tunnelling. In: Proceedings of the Rapid Excavation and Tunnelling Conference.Chicago, IL, 1: 259–286. (1972). [Google Scholar]
  17. Muir Wood, A.M. The circular tunnel in elastic ground. Géotechnique. 25(1): 115–127. (1975). [Google Scholar]
  18. Lee, K. M. and Ge, X. W. The equivalence of a jointed shield-driven tunnel lining to a continuous ring structure. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 38(3), 461–483. (2001). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Do, N.A. Numerical analyses of segmental tunnel lining under static and dynamic loads. PhD Thesis. Civil Engineering. INSA de Lyon. English. Hanoi, Vietnam. (2014). [Google Scholar]
  20. ABAQUS 6.10, User’s manual. Hibbitt, Karlson and Sorenson, Inc.Pawtucket, RI, USA.(2010). [Google Scholar]
  21. Mroueh, H. and Shahrour, I. A full 3-D finite element analysis of tunneling–adjacent structures interaction. Computers and Geotechnics. 30(3): 245–253. (2003). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Möller, S. Tunnel induced settlements and structural forces in linings. Universitat Stuttgart, Mitteilung. Ph.D. disertation, Stuttgart University. (2006). [Google Scholar]
  23. Osborne, N. H, Knight Hassell, C, Tan, L C, and Wong R A review of the performance of the tunnelling for Singapore’s circle line project. World Tunnel Congress – Underground Facilities for Better Environment and Safety, India (2008) [Google Scholar]
  24. Namazi, E., Mohamad, H., Hong, A.K.B., Hajihassani, M., Jusoh, S.N. and Abad., S.V.A.N.K. Ground behaviour around a tunnel using various soil models. Electronic Journal Geotechnics Engineering (EJGE). 17: 609-621(2012). [Google Scholar]
  25. Luttikholt, A. Ultimate Limit State Analysis of a Segmented Tunnel Lining Results of Full-scale Tests Compared to Finite Element Analysis. Master Thesis. Delft University of Technology. Delft. (2007). [Google Scholar]
  26. Jusoh, S. N.. Performance of Precast Bolted Tunnel Lining Through Physical And Numerical Modelling. PhD Thesis. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Johor Bahru. (2017) [Google Scholar]
  27. Mohamad, H., Bennett, P. J., Soga, K., Mair, R. J., Lim, C.-S., Knight-Hassell, C. K. and Ow, C. N. Monitoring tunnel deformation induced by close-proximity bored tunnelling using distributed optical fiber strain measurements. Proc. 7t Int. Symp. on Field Measurements in Geomechanics, Boston. (2007). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.