EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 250 (2018) MATEC Web Conf., 250 (2018) 01004 References
Open Access
Issue
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 250, 2018
The 12th International Civil Engineering Post Graduate Conference (SEPKA) – The 3rd International Symposium on Expertise of Engineering Design (ISEED) (SEPKA-ISEED 2018)
Article Number 01004
Number of page(s) 7
Section Geotechnical Engineering
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201825001004
Published online 11 December 2018
  1. J. Wang, L. Guo, Y. Cai, C. Xu, and C. Gu, “Strain and pore pressure development on soft marine clay in triaxial tests with a large number of cycles,” Ocean Eng., vol. 74, pp. 125–132, Dec. (2013). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. M. A. M. Al-Bared and A. Marto, “A Review on the Geotechnical and Engineering Characteristics of Marine Clay and the Modern Methods of Improvements,” Malaysian J. Fundam. Appl. Sci., vol. 13, no. 4, pp. 825–831, (2017). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. A. P. Panda and S. Narasimha Rao, “Undrained strength characteristics of an artificially cemented marine clay,” Mar. Georesources Geotechnol., vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 335–353, (1998). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. G. Kang, T. Tsuchida, and A. M. R. G. Athapaththu, “Engineering behavior of cement-treated marine dredged clay during early and later stages of curing,” Eng. Geol., vol. 209, pp. 163–174, Jul. (2016). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. H. W. Xiao, F. H. Lee, and K. G. Chin, “Yielding of cement-treated marine clay,” Soils Found., vol. 54, no. 3, pp. 488–501, (2014). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. G. o. Kang, T. Tsuchida, and Y. sang Kim, “Strength and stiffness of cement-treated marine dredged clay at various curing stages,” Constr. Build. Mater., vol. 132, pp. 71–84, (2017). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. H. W. Xiao and F. H. Lee, “Curing Time Effect on Behavior of Cement Treated Marine Clay,” vol. 2, no. 7, pp. 144–151, (2008). [Google Scholar]
  8. S. Sasanian and T. A. Newson, “Basic parameters governing the behaviour of cement-treated clays,” Soils Found., vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 209–224, (2014). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. N. Z. Mohd Yunus et al., “Performance of lime-treated marine clay on strength and compressibility chracteristics,” Int. J. GEOMATE, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 1232–1238, (2015). [Google Scholar]
  10. D. Rao, P. Pranav, and V. Ganja, “A Laboratory Study on the Lime and Sawdust Treated Marine Clay Sub Grade Flexible Pavement under Cyclic Pressure,” Int. J. Eng. Innov. Technol., vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 207–210, (2012). [Google Scholar]
  11. D. K. Rao, V. Ganja, P. R. T. Pranav, and R. H. Ash, “A Laboratory Study of Cyclic Plate Load Test on Lime and Rice Husk Ash Treated Marine Clay Subgrade Flexible Pavements,” vol. 2, pp. 4465–4469, (2012). [Google Scholar]
  12. G. Rajasekaran and S. N. Rao, “Effect of Pollutants on the Physical and Engineering Behavior of Lime-Treated Marine Clay,” Mar. Georesources Geotechnol., vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 17–35, Jan. (2001). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. C. Phetchuay, S. Horpibulsuk, A. Arulrajah, C. Suksiripattanapong, and A. Udomchai, “Strength development in soft marine clay stabilized by fly ash and calcium carbide residue based geopolymer,” Appl. Clay Sci., vol. 127, no. 128, pp. 134–142, (2016). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. S. Saleh, “Micro Level Analysis of Weak Soils Stabilized with Locust Bean Waste Ash ( LBWA ),” Int. J. Civ. Eng. Constr. Sci., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 9–15, (2015). [Google Scholar]
  15. S. Saleh and S. Srividhya, “Stabilization of Weak Soils using Locust Bean,” Int. J. Res. Eng. Sci. Technol., vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 1–6, (2015). [Google Scholar]
  16. J. E. Sani, A. O. Eberemu, T. S. Ijimdiya, and K. J. Osinubi, “Effect of Locust Bean Waste Ash on the Strength Properties of Black Cotton Soil Using Cement Kiln Dust as an Activator,” in Department of Civil Engineering, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, no. 1, pp. 249–257, (2014). [Google Scholar]
  17. S. Saleh, “Improving the Strength of Subgrade Soils using Locust Bean Waste Ash (LBWA),” J. Civ. Eng. Environ. Technol., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 180–184, (2016). [Google Scholar]
  18. S. Teresa and J. Annie, “Study on the Effects of Marine Clay Stabilized with Banana Fibre,” Int. J. Sci. Eng. Res., vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 2347–3878, (2014). [Google Scholar]
  19. P. T. Ravichandran, A. S. Prasad, K. D. Krishnan, and P. R. K Rajkumar, “Effect of Addition of Waste Tyre Crumb Rubber on Weak Soil Stabilisation,” Indian J. Sci. Technol., vol. 9, no. 5, (2016). [Google Scholar]
  20. A. Upadhyay and S. Kaur, “Review on Soil Stabilization Using Ceramic Waste,” Int. Res. J. Eng. Technol., vol. 03, no. 07, pp. 1748–1750, (2016). [Google Scholar]
  21. Y. Yi, L. Gu, and S. Liu, “Microstructural and Mechanical Properties of Marine Soft Clay Stabilized by Lime-Activated Ground Granulated Blast Furnace Slag,” Appl. Clay Sci., vol. 103, pp. 71–76, Jan. (2015). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. P. Faizal, M. Aminaton, M. Y. N. Zurairahetty, A. T. S. Azhar, and T. C. Soon, “Effect of Sodium Silicate as Liquid Based Stabilizer on Shear Strength of Marine Clay,” J. Teknol., vol. 76, no. 2, pp. 45–50, (2015). [Google Scholar]
  23. Z. Yang, X. Zhang, X. Liu, X. Guan, C. Zhang, and Y. Niu, “Flexible and stretchable polyurethane/waterglass grouting material,” Constr. Build. Mater., vol. 138, pp. 240–246, May (2017). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. D. F. Grouting, “Grouting Materials,” in Dam Foundation Grouting, Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers, pp. 87–136, (2007). [Google Scholar]
  25. E. A. Vik et al., “Experiences from environmental risk management of chemical grouting agents used during construction of the Romeriksporten Tunnel,” Tunn. Undergr. Sp. Technol., vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 369–378, (2000). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. S. Kazemian, B. B. K. Huat, A. Prasad, and M. Barghchi, “A review of stabilization of soft soils by injection of chemical grouting,” J. Appl. Sci. Res., vol. 6, no. 12, pp. 5862–5868, (2010). [Google Scholar]
  27. B. Chun, D. S. Ryu, C. Shin, G. Im, J. Choi, and H. Lim, “The Performance of Polyurethane Injection Method with Soil Nailing System for Ground Reinforcement,” in Ground improvement geosystems ICE Publishing, pp. 445–451, (1997). [Google Scholar]
  28. R. Valentino and D. Stevanoni, “Behaviour of reinforced polyurethane resin micropiles,” in Institution of Civil Engineers, Geotechnical Engineering169, vol. 169, no. GE2, pp. 187–200, (2016). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. M. Bayati and J. Khademi Hamidi, “A case study on TBM tunnelling in fault zones and lessons learned from ground improvement,” Tunn. Undergr. Sp. Technol., vol. 63, pp. 162–170, (2017). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. L. Priddy, S. Jersey, and C. Reese, “Full-Scale Field Testing for Injected Foam Stabilization of Portland Cement Concrete Repairs,” Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board, vol. 2155, no. 1, pp. 24–33, Dec. (2010). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. I. B. Mohamed Jais, “Rapid remediation using polyurethane foam / resin grout in Malaysia,” Geotech. Reseach, vol. 4, no. GR2, pp. 107–117, (2017). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. P. K. R. Vennapusa, Y. Zhang, and D. J. White, “Comparison of Pavement Slab Stabilization Using Cementitious Grout and Injected Polyurethane Foam,” J. Perform. Constr. Facil., vol. 04016056, pp. 1–14, (2016). [Google Scholar]
  33. S. Li, R. Liu, Q. Zhang, and X. Zhang, “Protection against water or mud inrush in tunnels by grouting: A review,” J. Rock Mech. Geotech. Eng., vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 753–766, (2016). [Google Scholar]
  34. D. K. Chattopadhyay and D. C. Webster, “Thermal stability and flame retardancy of polyurethanes,” Prog. Polym. Sci., vol. 34, no. 10, pp. 1068–1133, (2009). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  35. D. K. Chattopadhyay and K. V. S. N. Raju, “Structural Engineering of Polyurethane Coatings for High-Performance Applications,” Prog. Polym. Sci., vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 352–418, (2007). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  36. S. A. Madbouly and J. U. Otaigbe, “Recent advances in synthesis, characterization and rheological properties of polyurethanes and POSS/polyurethane nanocomposites dispersions and films,” Prog. Polym. Sci., vol. 34, no. 12, pp. 1283–1332, (2009). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  37. S. Ramesh and K. Punithamurthy, “The effect of organoclay on thermal and mechanical behaviours of thermoplastic polyurethane nanocomposites,” Dig. J. Nanomater. Biostructures, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 331–338, (2017). [Google Scholar]
  38. J. O. Akindoyo, M. D. H. Beg, S. Ghazali, M. R. Islam, N. Jeyaratnam, and A. R. Yuvaraj, “Polyurethane types, synthesis and applications – a review,” RSC Adv., vol. 6, no. 115, pp. 114453–114482, (2016). [Google Scholar]
  39. H. Janik and M. Marzec, “A review: Fabrication of porous polyurethane scaffolds,” Mater. Sci. Eng. C, vol. 48, pp. 586–591, (2015). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  40. BS 1377-1, “General requirements and sample preparation,” (1990). [Google Scholar]
  41. BS 1377-2, “Classification tests,” 1990. [Google Scholar]
  42. BS 1377-3, “Chemical and electro-chemical tests,” (1990). [Google Scholar]
  43. BS 1377-7, “Shear strength tests (total stress),” (1990). [Google Scholar]
  44. A. Marto, M. R. Jahidin, N. A. Aziz, F. Kasim, and N. Z. Mohd Yunus, “Stabilization Of Marine Clay Using Biomass Silica-Rubber Chips Mixture,” IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng., vol. 160, no. 1, p. 012084, Nov. (2016). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  45. S. Basack and R. D. Purkayastha, “Engineering properties of marine clays from the eastern coast of India,” vol. 1, no. 6, pp. 109–114, (2009). [Google Scholar]
  46. C. Vipulanandan, M. B. Kazez, and S. Henning, “Pressure-Temperature-Volume Change Relationship for a Hydrophilic Polyurethane Grout,” in Grouting and Deep Mixing, pp. 1808–1818, (2012). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  47. B. N. Babcock, “Cement Grout vs . Chemical Grout: Which One to Use , When , and Why,” A White Paper providing guidance to the Geotechnical Community, pp. 1–4, (2018). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.