EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 150 (2018) MATEC Web of Conferences, 150 (2018) 05038 References
Open Access
Issue
MATEC Web of Conferences
Volume 150, 2018
Malaysia Technical Universities Conference on Engineering and Technology (MUCET 2017)
Article Number 05038
Number of page(s) 6
Section Education, Social Science & Technology Management
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201815005038
Published online 23 February 2018
  1. Pochat S. L., Gwenola Bertoluci, Daniel Froelich - Integrating ecodesign by conducting changes in SMEs - Journal of Cleaner Production - Vol. 15, p.671-680 – 2006 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Paul Knight/James O. Jenkins (2006). Adopting and Applying Eco-Design Techniques: A Practitioners erspective. Research and Development Department. [Google Scholar]
  3. SME Corporation Malaysia (2016) Online:smecorp.gov.my [Google Scholar]
  4. Dangelico R. M., Devashish Pujari (2010). Mainstreaming Green Product Innovation: Why and How Companies Integrate Environmental Sustainability. Journal of Business Ethics, 471–486. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Hart, S. (2007), “Beyond greening: strategies for a sustainable world”, in Harvard Business Review on Green Business Strategy, Harvard Business School Publishing Corporation, Boston, MA. [Google Scholar]
  6. Keith Goffin Colin New, (2001),"Customer support and new product development - An exploratory study", International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 21 Iss 3 pp. 275 – 301 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Woodcock D.J. Mosey S.P. Wood,T.B.W. (2000),"New product development in British SMEs", European Journal of Innovation Management, Vol. 3 Iss 4 pp. 212 – 222 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Bjarne JensenHanne Harmsen, (2001),"Implementation of success factors in new product development ?", European Journal of Innovation Management, Vol. 4 Iss 1 pp. 37 – 52 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Naga Vamsi Krishna Jasti Aditya Sharma Shashikantha Karinka, (2015),"Development of a framework for green product development", Benchmarking: An International Journal, Vol. 22 Iss 3 pp. 426 – 445 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Rodney McAdam, Frances Fulton, (2002) "The impact of the ISO 9000:2000 quality standards in small software firms", Managing Service Quality: An International Journal, Vol. 12 Iss: 5, pp.336 - 345. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Trevor Cadden Stephen John Downes, (2013),"Developing a business process for product development", Business Process Management Journal, Vol. 19 Iss 4 pp. 715 – 736 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Berchicci, L. and Bodewes, W. (2005), “Bridging environmental issues with new product development”, Business Strategy and the Environment, Vol. 14 No. 5, pp. 272-285. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Ki-Hoon Lee, (2009),"Why and how to adopt green management into business organizations?" Management Decision, Vol. 47 Iss 7 pp. 1101 – 1121 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Ioannis Papadopoulos, Glykeria Karagouni, Marios Trigkas, Zoi Beltsiou, (2014) "Mainstreaming green product strategies: Why and how furniture companies integrate environmental sustainability?", EuroMed Journal of Business, Vol. 9 Iss: 3, pp.293 – 317 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Stanley Kam-Sing Wong, (2012),"The influence of green product competitiveness on the success of green product innovation", European Journal of Innovation Management, Vol. 15 Iss 4 pp. 468 – 490 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Allen H. Hu Chia-Wei Hsu, (2010),"Critical factors for implementing green supply chain management practice", Management Research Review, Vol. 33 Iss 6 pp. 586 – 608 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Sang M. Lee Sung Tae Kim Donghyun Choi, (2012),"Green supply chain managementand organizational performance", Industrial Management & Data Systems, Vol. 112 Iss 8 pp. 1148 – 1180 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Su-Yol Lee, (2008),"Drivers for the participation of small and medium-sized suppliers in green supply chain initiatives", Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, Vol. 13 Iss 3 pp. 185 – 198 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Sreejith, B. (2012), “A hierarchical framework of barriers to green supply chain management in the construction sector”, Journal of Sustainable Development, Vol. 10, pp. 15-27. [Google Scholar]
  20. Hosseini, A. (2007), “Identification of green management of system’s factors – a conceptualized model”, International Journal of Management Science and Engineering Management, Vol. 2 No. 3, pp. 221-228. [Google Scholar]
  21. Watchaneeporn Setthasakko, (2009),"Barriers to implementing corporate environmental responsibility in Thailand", International [Google Scholar]
  22. Rao, P. and Holt, D. (2005), “Do green supply chains lead to competitiveness and economic performance”, International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 5 No. 25, pp. 898-916. [Google Scholar]
  23. Jiju Antony, Maneesh Kumar, Christian N. Madu, (2005) "Six sigma in small-and medium-sized UK manufacturing enterprises: Some empirical observations", International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, Vol. 22 Iss: 8, pp.860 - 874 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Sharma, B.P., Singh, M.D. and Neha (2012), “Modeling the knowledge sharing barriers using an ISM approach”, International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, Vol. 45, pp. 233-238. [Google Scholar]
  25. Daine, H. (2009), “An analysis of the drivers affecting the implementation of green supply chain management”, Journal of Resources, Conservation and Recycling, Vol. 55 No. 6, pp. 659-667. [Google Scholar]
  26. Mudgal, R.K., Shankar, R., Talib, P. and Raj, T. (2010), “Modeling the barriers of green supply chain practices: an Indian perspective”, International Journal of Logistics Systems and Management, Vol. 7 No. 1, pp. 81-107. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.