Open Access
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 139, 2017
2017 3rd International Conference on Mechanical, Electronic and Information Technology Engineering (ICMITE 2017)
Article Number 00216
Number of page(s) 5
Published online 05 December 2017
  1. Christophe Latry, Vincent Despringre, et al. Automatic MTF measurement through a least square method. SPIE, 2004, 5570: 233–244. [Google Scholar]
  2. Barnard K J, Anisimov I, Scheihing IE. Random laser speckle based modulation transfer function measurement of midwives infrared focal plane arrays. Optical Engineering, 2012, 51(8), 083601:1–8 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Brian T. Teipen, Duncant L. MacFarlane. Liquid-crystal-display projector-based modulation transfer function measurements of charge-coupled-device video camera systems. Applied Optics, 2000, 39(4): 515–525. [Google Scholar]
  4. K.M. Hock. Effect of oversampling in pixel arrays, Optical Engineering, 1995, 34(5): 1281–1288. [Google Scholar]
  5. O. Hadar, A. Dogariu, G.D. Boreman. Angular dependence of sampling MTF. SPIE, 1998, 3110: 536–547. [Google Scholar]
  6. S.B. Campana. Techniques for evaluating charge couple dimagers. Optical Engineering, 1977, 16(3): 267–274. [Google Scholar]
  7. S.K. Park, R.A. Schowengerdt, M.A. Kaczynski. Modulation-Transfer-Function Analysis for Sampled Image Systems, Applied Optics, 1984, 23(15), 2572–2582. [Google Scholar]
  8. J. Feltz, M. Karim. Modulation transfer function of charge coupled devices. Applied Optics, 1990, 29(5): 717–722. [Google Scholar]
  9. Song Min, Kuai Xin kai, Zheng Ya ru. Influence of phase match between input signal and CCD pixel on the MTF. Otical Technique, 1999, 25(3):84–86. [Google Scholar]
  10. Jyrki Laitinen. Method for evaluation of imaging in automated visual web inspection. Optical Engineering, 1997, 36(8): 2184–2196. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.