Open Access
Issue
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 125, 2017
21st International Conference on Circuits, Systems, Communications and Computers (CSCC 2017)
Article Number 04006
Number of page(s) 5
Section Computers
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201712504006
Published online 04 October 2017
  1. Sveriges Kommuner och Landsting, Svensk sjukvård i internationell jämförelse. (Swedish health care in international comparison.), Stockholm(2015). [Google Scholar]
  2. Ministry of Health and Social Affairs, Health and medical care in Sweden, Ministry of Health and Social Affairs, Ed., ed. Stockholm: The Government Offices of Sweden (2011, updated 30 January 2012). [Google Scholar]
  3. Socialstyrelsen, Öppna jämförelser 2016 - En god vård? Övergripande uppföljning utifrån sex frågor om hälso- och sjukvårdens resultat (Comparisons 2016 - A good health care? Overall follow-up based on six questions about health care results), Stockholm(2017). [Google Scholar]
  4. M. Elg, J. Stenberg, P. Kammerlind, S. Tullberg, J. Olsson, Swedish healthcare management practices and quality improvement work: development trends, Int J Health Care Qual Assur, vol. 24, pp. 101–23 (2011). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. G. Bronzetti, M. A. Baldini, G. Sicoli, Intellectual Capital Report in the Healthcare Sector: An Analysis of a Case Study, in Handbook of Research on Human Resources Strategies for the New Millennial Workforce, P. O. d. Pablos and R. D. Tennyson, Eds., ed: Business Science Reference (2017). [Google Scholar]
  6. A. Garlatti, M. Massaro, V. Bruni, Intellectual capital evaluation in a health care organization. A case study., presented at the XIX IRSPM Conference, Birmingham (2015). [Google Scholar]
  7. C. El Morr, J. Subercaze, Knowledge management in healthcare, in Handbook of Research on Developments in e-Health and Telemedicine: Technological and Social Perspectives, ed: IGI Global (2010), pp. 490–510. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. J. M. Evans, A. Brown, G. R. Baker, Intellectual capital in the healthcare sector: a systematic review and critique of the literature, BMC Health Serv Res, vol. 15, p. 556 Dec 15 (2015). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. S.-C. Chang, S.-S. Chen, J.-H. Lai, The effect of alliance experience and intellectual capital on the value creation of international strategic alliances, Omega, vol. 36, pp. 298–316 (2008). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. L. Moore, L. Craig, Intellectual capital in enterprise success: strategy revisited: John Wiley & Sons (2008). [Google Scholar]
  11. S. Veltri, G. Bronzetti, G. Sicoli, Reporting intellectual capital in health care organizations: Specifics, lessons learned, and future research perspectives, (2011). [Google Scholar]
  12. J. Van Beveren, Does health care for knowledge management?, Journal of knowledge management, vol. 7, pp. 90–95 (2003). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. D. Jelonek, A. Halilovic, From intangible assets to management of intellectual capital within health care industry. A comparative study between Sweden and Poland, International Journal of Economics and Statistics, vol. 4, (2016). [Google Scholar]
  14. M. P. Stroupe. (2013). What is EHR Interoperability and Why Should I Care? A reference document for Urgent Care and Occupational Health Providers. Available: http://www.nethealth.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/What-is-EHR-Interoperability.pdf [Google Scholar]
  15. M. Schweitzer, A. Hoerbst, Dynamic User Interfaces for Service Oriented Architectures in Healthcare, Stud Health Technol Inform, vol. 228, pp. 795–7 (2016). [Google Scholar]
  16. M. Nordman, Överskrift, titel, namn eller rubrik? Några beteckningar i teori och praktik (Caption, title, name or heading? Some indications of the theory and practice), in I terminologins tjänst Festskrift för Heribert Picht på 60-årsdagen, A. Nuopponen, B. Toft, and J. Myking, Eds., ed Vaasa: Vasa universitet (2000), pp. 110–7. [Google Scholar]
  17. N. Bontis, Managing organizational knowledge by diagnosing intellectual capital: Framing and advancing the state of the field, in The Strategic Management of Intellectual Capital and Organizational Knowledge, N. Bontis and C. W. Choo, Eds., ed New York: Oxford University Press (2002). [Google Scholar]
  18. M. Subramaniam, M. A. Youndt, The Influence of Intellectual Capital on the Types of Innovative Capabilities, The Academy of Management Journal, vol. 48, pp. 450–463 (2005). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. P. Ordóñez de Pablos, Measuring and reporting structural capital: Lessons from European learning firms, Journal of Intellectual Capital, vol. 5, pp. 629–647 (2004). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. I. Nonaka, A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation, Organization Science, vol. 5, pp. 14–37 (1994). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. N. Rosén von Rosenstein, De historiis morborum rite consignandis, Harderwijk, (1730). [Google Scholar]
  22. I. Nilsson, Medicinsk dokumentation genom tiderna (Medical documentation through the ages). Lund: Lunds universitet (2007). [Google Scholar]
  23. R. Hynninen, B. Wadman, H. Åberg, Att skriva patientjournaler (Writing patient records), 2nd ed. Lund: Studentlitteratur (1984). [Google Scholar]
  24. A. Terner, H. Lindstedt, M. Pless, K. Sonnander, A Retrospective Analysis of Health, Health Care, and Legal Requirements as Reflected in Predefined Headings in an EHR, e-Journal of Health Informatics vol. 9, (2015). [Google Scholar]
  25. D. L. Andreen, L. J. Dobie, J. C. Jasperson, T. A. Lucas, C. L. Wubbenhorst, The conversion to electronic hospital notes at Mayo Clinic. Overcoming barriers and challenges, J Healthc Inf Manag, vol. 24, pp. 57–64 Summer (2010). [Google Scholar]
  26. J. C. Denny, A., Spickard, 3rd, K. B. Johnson, N. B. Peterson, J. F. Peterson, R. A. Miller, Evaluation of a method to identify and categorize section headers in clinical documents, J Am Med Inform Assoc, vol. 16, pp. 806–15 Nov-Dec (2009). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. The National Alliance for Health Information Technology, Report to the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology on Defining key health information technology terms, (2008). [Google Scholar]
  28. International Organization for Standardization, Health informatics - Electronic health record - Definition, scope and context, (2006). [Google Scholar]
  29. A. Terner, Predefined Headings in a Multi-professional Electronic Health Record: Professionals’ Application, Aspects of Health and Health Care and Correspondence to Legal Requirements, Uppsala universitet, (2014). [Google Scholar]
  30. W. W. Stead, Rethinking electronic health records to better achieve quality and safety goals, Annu Rev Med, vol. 58, pp. 35–47 (2007). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. C. M. Cusack, Electronic health records and electronic prescribing: promise and pitfalls, Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am, vol. 35, pp. 63–79, ix Mar (2008). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. A. Terner, H. Lindstedt, K. Sonnander, Predefined headings in a multiprofessional electronic health record system, J Am Med Inform Assoc, vol. 19, pp. 1032–8 Nov-Dec (2012). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. A. Halilovic, A. Terner, Standardized headings as a foundation for semantic interoperability in EHR, MATEC Web Conf., vol. 76, p. 04001 (2016). [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  34. Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society. (2005). Interoperability Definition and Background. Approved by HIMSS Board of Directors 06/09/05. Available: http://www.himss.org/sites/himssorg/files/HIMSSorg/Content/files/AUXILIOHIMSSInteroperabilityDefined.pdf [Google Scholar]
  35. European Commission, European Interoperability Framework (EIF) for European public services, European Commission, Ed., ed. Bruxelles, Belgique: European Commission (2010). [Google Scholar]
  36. Patientdatalag (Patient Data Act), Socialdepartementet (2008). [Google Scholar]
  37. Nationella Kvalitetsregister. (2016, 24 March). Swedish National Quality Registries. Available: http://kvalitetsregister.se/englishpages.2040.html [Google Scholar]
  38. Sveriges Kommuner och Landsting. (2016). Öppna jämförelser (Open Comparison and Assessment). Available: https://skl.se/tjanster/merfranskl/oppnajamforelser.275.html [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.