Open Access
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 125, 2017
21st International Conference on Circuits, Systems, Communications and Computers (CSCC 2017)
Article Number 04002
Number of page(s) 6
Section Computers
Published online 04 October 2017
  1. C. Scheffer, H. Kratz, P.S. Heyns, F. Klocke, Development of a tool wear-monitoring system for hard turning, International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture, 43, 973–985 (2003). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. D. E. Dimla, P. M. Lister, On-line metal cutting tool condition monitoring. I: force, vibration analyses, International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture, 40, 739–768 (2000). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. K. Jemielniak, T. Urbański, J. Kossakowska J., S. Bombiński, Tool condition monitoring based on numerous signal features, Int J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., 59, 73–81 (2012). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. N. H. Abu-Zahra, G. Yu, Gradual wear monitoring of turning inserts using wavelet analysis of ultrasound waves, International Journal of Machine Tools & Manufacture, 43, 33–343 (2003). [Google Scholar]
  5. R. Lemaster, L. Lu, S. Jackson, The use of process monitoring techniques on a CNC wood router. Part 1. Sensor selection, Forest Products Journal, 50, 7/8, 31–64 (2000). [Google Scholar]
  6. J. Wilkowski, J. Górski, Vibro-acoustic signals as a source of information about tool wear during laminated chipboard milling, Wood Research, 56, 1, 57–66 (2011). [Google Scholar]
  7. R. G. Silva, K. J. Baker, S. J. Wilcox, The adaptability of a tool wear monitoring system under changing cutting conditions, Mechanical Systems, Signal Processing, 14, 2, 287–298 (2000). [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  8. R. J. Kuo, Multi-sensor integration for on-line tool wear estimation through artificial neural networks, fuzzy neural network, Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 13, 249–261 (2000). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. A. Noori-Khajavi, R. Komandur, Frequency, time domain analyses of sensor signals in drilling-Part I, International Journal of Machine Tools, Manufacture, 35, 6, 775–793 (1995). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. J. H. Zhou, C. K. Pang, Z. W. Zhong, F. L. Lewis, Tool wear monitoring using acoustic emissions by dominant-feature identification, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation, Measurement, 60, 2, 547–559 (2011). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. S. S. Panda, A. K. Singh, D. Chakraborty, S. K. Pal, Drill wear monitoring using back propagation neural network, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 172, 283–290 (2006). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. K. Patra, S. K. Pal, K. Bhattacharyya, Artificial neural network based prediction of drill flank wear from motor current signals, Applied Soft Computing, 7, 929–935 (2007). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. P. Lezanski, An intelligent system for grinding wheel condition monitoring, Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 109, 258–263 (2001). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. H. Lutkepohl, Introduction to Multiple Time Series Analysis, Berlin Springer-Verlag (1991). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Matlab user manual, Natick: MathWorks, (2014). [Google Scholar]
  16. P.N. Tan, M. Steinbach, V. Kumar, Introduction to data mining, Boston: Pearson Education Inc. (2006). [Google Scholar]
  17. J. Kurek, S. Osowski, Support vector machine for fault diagnosis of the broken rotor bars of squirrel-cage induction motor, Neural Computing and Applications, 19, 557–564 (2010). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. V. Kecman, Learning, Soft Computing: Support Vector Machines, Neural Networks,, Fuzzy Logic Models, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press (2001). [Google Scholar]
  19. M. Kruk, A. Jegorowa, J. Kurek, S. Osowski, J. Górski, Automatic recognition of drill condition on the basis of images of drilled holes, in Proc. Conference “Computational Problems of Electrical Engineering”, Sandomierz, 2016, pp. 1–4 [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.