Open Access
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 114, 2017
2017 International Conference on Mechanical, Material and Aerospace Engineering (2MAE 2017)
Article Number 03002
Number of page(s) 6
Section Chapter 3: Aerospace
Published online 10 July 2017
  1. M.H. Shan, J. Guo and E. Gill, Review and comparison of active space debris capturing and removal methods, Prog Aerosp Sci. 80 (2016) 18–32. [Google Scholar]
  2. J.-C. Liou, N.L. Johnson and N.M. Hill, Controlling the growth of future LEO debris populations with active debris removal, Acta Astronaut. 66 (2010) 648–653. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. C. Bonnal, J.M. Ruault and M.C. Desjean, Active debris removal: recent progress and current trends, Acta Astronaut. 85 (2013) 51–60. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. G. Creamer, The SUMO/FREND project: technology development for autonomous grapple of geosynchronous satellites, Adv Astronaut Sci. 128 (2007) 895–909. [Google Scholar]
  5. T. Boge, T. Wimmer, O. Ma and M. Zebenay, EPOS-A robotics-based hardware-in-the-loop simulator for simulating satellite RvD operations. In: 10th International symposium on artificial intelligence, robotics and automation in space, Sapporo, Japan, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  6. J.A.F. Deloo, Analysis of the rendezvous phase of e.Deorbit: guidance, communication and illumination. PhD Thesis, Delft University of Technology, NL, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  7. S. Kawamoto, T. Makida, F. Sasaki, et al, Precise numerical simulations of electrodynamic tethers for an active debris removal system, Acta Astronaut. 59 (2006) 139–148. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. C.R. Phipps, K.L. Baker, S.B. Libby, et al, Removing orbital debris with lasers, Adv Space Res. 49 (2012) 1283–1300. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. M. Richard, L. Kronig, F. Belloni, et al, Uncooperative rendezvous and docking for MicroSats, In: 6th International conference on recent advances in space technologies, Istanbul, Türkiye, 12-14 June 2013. [Google Scholar]
  10. O.A. Araromi, I. Gavrilovich, J. Shintake, et al, Rollable multisegment dielectric elastomer minimum energy structures for a deployable microsatellite gripper, IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics. 20 (2015) 438–446. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.