Open Access
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 114, 2017
2017 International Conference on Mechanical, Material and Aerospace Engineering (2MAE 2017)
Article Number 03001
Number of page(s) 9
Section Chapter 3: Aerospace
Published online 10 July 2017
  1. Tsiotras, P., and Nailly, A., Comparison Between Peer-to-Peer and Single Spacecraft Refueling Strategies for Spacecraft in Circular Orbits, Infotech at Aerospace Conference, AIAA Paper 2005-7115, Arlington, VA, Sept. 2005 [Google Scholar]
  2. J. Zhang, G.T. Parks, Y.Z. Luo, et al. Multispacecraft Refueling Optimization Considering the J2 Perturbation and Window Constraints. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics. 37(1) (2014): 111–122. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. H. Shen, P. Tsiotras, Optimal Scheduling for Servicing Multiple Satellites in a Circular Constellation, in: AIAA/AAS Astrodynamics Specialists Conference and Exhibit, (Monterey, CA), Aug. 2002. [Google Scholar]
  4. Q. Ouyang, W. Yao, X.Q. Chen, Mission Programming of On-orbit Re-fueling for Geosynchronous Satellites (in Chinese), J. Astronaut 31 (2010) 2629–2634. [Google Scholar]
  5. J. Zhang, Y.Z. Luo, G.J. Tang, Hybrid planning for LEO long-duration multi-spacecraft rendezvous mission, Sci. China Tech. Sci. 55 (2012) 233–243. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. X. Bo, Q. Feng, Research on constellation refueling based on formation flying, Acta Astronautica 68 (2011) 1987-1995. [Google Scholar]
  7. Dutta A, Arora N, Russell RP. Peer-to-Peer Refueling Strategy Using Low-Thrust Propulsion [J]. Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, 2012, 49(5): 944–954. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Shen, H., and Tsiotras, P., “Peer-to-Peer Refueling for Circular Satellite Constellations,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 28, No. 6, 2005, pp. 1220-1230. doi:10.2514/1.9570 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Dutta, A., and Tsiotras, P., “Egalitarian Peer-to-Peer Satellite Refueling Strategy,” Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets, Vol. 45, No. 3, 2008, pp. 608–618. doi:10.2514/1.31299 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Dutta, A., and Tsiotras, P., “Network Flow Formulation for Cooperative Peer-to-Peer Refueling Strategies,” Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, Vol. 33, No. 5, 2010, pp. 1539–1549 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. B.A. Conway, C.M. Chilan, B.J. Wall, Evolutionary Principles Applied to Mission Planning Problems, Celestial Mechanics and Dynamical Astronomy 97(2) (2007): 73–86. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. I.M. Ross, C.N. D’Souza, Hybrid Optimal Control Framework for Mission Planning, Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics 28(4) (2005): 686–697. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. C.M. Chilan, Automated Design of Multiphase Space Missions Using Hybrid Optimal Control. Ph.D. diss., University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  14. B.J. Wall, B.A. Conway, Genetic Algorithms Applied to the Solution of Hybrid Optimal Control Problems in Astrodynamics, J. Glob. Optim. 44 (2009): 493–508. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Jing Y, Chen X, Chen L. Biobjective planning of GEO debris removal mission with multiple servicing spacecrafts [J]. Acta Astronautica, 2014, 105(1): 311–320. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Jing Yu, Xiao-qian Chen, Li-hu Chen, Dong Hao. Optimal scheduling of GEO debris removing based on hybrid optimal control theory [J]. Acta Astronautica, 2014, 93: 400–409. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Jing Yu, Xiao-qian Chen, Li-hu Chen. Optimal planning of LEO active debris removal based on hybrid optimal control theory [J]. Advances in Space Research, 2015, 55(11): 2628–2640. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. H. L. Shi, Y. B. Han, L. H. Ma, et al., Beyong Life-Cycle Utilization of Geostationary Communication Satellites in End-of-Life, Satellite Communications (2010) 323-365. [Google Scholar]
  19. L. J. Friesen, A. A. Jackson, H. A. Zook, et al., Analysis of Orbital Perturbations Acting on Objects in Orbits Near Geosynchronous Earth Orbit, Journal of Geophysical Research 97 (1992) 3845–3863. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Alfriend KT, Lee D, Creamer NG. Optimal Servicing of Geosynchronous Satellites. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 2006, 29(1): 203–206. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.