Open Access
Issue
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 108, 2017
2017 International Conference on Mechanical, Aeronautical and Automotive Engineering (ICMAA 2017)
Article Number 06002
Number of page(s) 7
Section Modern Manufacturing
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201710806002
Published online 31 May 2017
  1. Gu, Xiaoyuan. 2010. Toyota Recalls: Revealing The Value Of Secure Supply Chain. Diss. Massachusetts Institute of Technology. [Google Scholar]
  2. Tech Drummer. 2008. Case Study: IBM & Airbus: Tech Drummer [Google Scholar]
  3. Jay Polonsky, M., & Ottman, J. 1998. Stakeholders’ contribution to the green new product development process. Journal of Marketing Management, 14(6), 533–557. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. Baumann, H., Boons, F., & Bragd, A. 2002. Mapping the green product development field: engineering, policy and business perspectives. Journal of Cleaner Production, 10(5), 409–425. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Lee, K. H., & Kim, J. W. 2011. Integrating suppliers into green product innovation development: an empirical case study in the semiconductor industry. Business Strategy and the Environment, 20(8), 527–538. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Stark, J. 2015. Product Lifecycle Management. (pp. 1–29). Springer International Publishing. (2015) [Google Scholar]
  7. Bevilacqua, M., Ciarapica, F. E., & Giacchetta, G. 2007. Development of a Sustainable Product Lifecycle In Manufacturing Firms: A Case Study. International Journal of Production Research, 45(18–19), 4073–4098. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. Gmelin, H., & Seuring, S. 2014. Achieving sustainable new product development by integrating product life-cycle management capabilities. International Journal of Production Economics, 154, 166–177. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Johnson, M.E., Cochran, J.J., Cox, L.A., Keskinocak, P., Kharoufeh, J.P., Smith, J.C. 2010. Product/Service Design Collaboration: Managing the Product Life. Wiley Encyclopedia of Operations Research and Management Science. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. [Google Scholar]
  10. Wiesner, S., Freitag, M., Westphal, I., & Thoben, K. D. 2015. Interactions between service and product lifecycle management. Procedia CIRP, 30, 36–41. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Tao, F., Wang, Y., Zuo, Y., Yang, H., & Zhang, M. 2016. Internet of Things in product life-cycle energy management. Journal of Industrial Information Integration, 1, 26–39. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Främling, K., Holmström, J., Loukkola, J., Nyman, J., & Kaustell, A. 2013. Sustainable PLM through intelligent products. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 26(2), 789–799. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Kiritsis, D. 2011. Closed-loop PLM for intelligent products in the era of the Internet of things. Computer-Aided Design, 43(5), 479–501. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Schuh, G., Rozenfeld, H., Assmus, D., & Zancul, E. 2008. Process oriented framework to support PLM implementation. Computers in industry, 59(2), 210–218. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Mourtzis, D. 2016. Challenges And Future Perspectives For The Life Cycle Of Manufacturing Networks In The Mass Customisation Era. Logistics Research, 9(1), 1–20. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. Mourtzis, D., Doukas, M., & Psarommatis, F. 2015. A Toolbox For The Design, Planning And Operation Of Manufacturing Networks In A Mass Customisation Environment. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 36, 274–286. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. Ståhl, J. E., Gabrielson, P., Stål, C., & Andersson, C. 2012. ACMFDAOALIDBM. In 45th CIRP Conference on Manufacturing Systems 2012. [Google Scholar]
  18. Xue, M., & Zhu C. 2009. The Socket Programming and Software Design For Communication Based On Client/Server. In Circuits, Communications and Systems, 2009. PACCS’09. Pacific-Asia Conference on 2009, (pp. 775–777). IEEE. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.