Open Access
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 87, 2017
The 9th International Unimas Stem Engineering Conference (ENCON 2016) “Innovative Solutions for Engineering and Technology Challenges”
Article Number 02018
Number of page(s) 6
Section Mechanical Engineering
Published online 12 December 2016
  1. W. Seifrits. Should we store carbon in charcoal. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 18, 5: 405–407 (1993). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. B. Glaser, J. Lehmann and W. Wolfgang Zech. Ameliorating physical and chemical properties of highly weathered soils in the tropics with charcoal – a review. Biol Fertil Soils, 35, 219–230 (2002). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. O.V. Adriana, S.L. Electo, R.Q. Quelbis, A.V. Ricardo and P.S.S. Thalis. A new technology for the combined production of charcoal and electricity through cogeneration. Biomass and bio energy, 69, 222–240 (2014). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. S.E. Hosseini, and M. Abdul Wahid. Utilization of palm solid residue as a source of renewable and sustainable energy in Malaysia. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 40, 621–632 (2014). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. T.A. Metts and S.A. Batterman. Effect of VOC loading on the ozone removal efficiency of activated carbon filter. Chemosphere, 62, 34–44 (2006). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. M.A. Sidheswaran, H. Destaillats, D.P. Sullivan, S. Cohn and W.J. Fisk. Energy efficient indoor VOC air cleaning with activated carbon fiber (ACF) filter. Building and Environment, 47, 357–367 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  7. E. Gallego, F.J. Roca, J.F. Perales and X. Guardino. Experimental evaluation of VOC removal efficiency of a coconut shell activated carbon filter for indoor air quality enhancement. Building and Environment, 67, 14–25 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  8. N.A. Fuadi, A.S. Ibrahim and K.N. Ismail. Review study for activated carbon from palm shell used for treatment of waste water, (2008). [Google Scholar]
  9. S. Wu, B. Dong, T. Qiao and J. Zhang. Effect of a biological activated carbon filter on particle counts. J Zhejiang Univ Sci A. 9, 1,1576–1581 (2008). [Google Scholar]
  10. I. Adedayo, A.O. Inegbenebor and H.I. Boyo. Comparison of the Adsorptive Capacity of Raw Materials in Making Activated Carbon Filter for Purification of Polluted Water for Drinking. ARPN Journal of Science and Technology, 2, 9, ISSN 2225-7217 (2012). [Google Scholar]
  11. A.A. Ismaiel, M.K. Aroua and R. Yusoff. Palm shell activated carbon impregnated with task-specific ionic-liquids as a novel adsorbent for the removal of mercury from contaminated water. Chemical Engineering Journal, 225, 306–314 (2013). [Google Scholar]
  12. M.A. Mujeebu, M.Z. Abdullah and A.A. Mohamad. Development of energy efficient porous medium burners on surface and submerged combustion modes. Energy, 36, 5132–5139 (2011) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. O.A. Ortiz, S.E. Noriega, C.A. Mengual and N.D. Martínez. Steady State Simulation of a Rotary Kiln for Charcoal Activation. Latin American Applied Research, 33, 51–57 (2003) [Google Scholar]
  14. E. Benanti, C. Freda, V. Lorefice, G. Braccio, and V.K. VinoSharma. Simulation of Olive Pits Pyrolysis in a Rotary Kiln Plant. Thermal Science, 15, 1, 145–158 (2011). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. Y. Yang, R. Boom, B. Brijan Irion, D.J. Heerden, P. Kuiper and W. Hans. Recycling of composite materials. Chem. Eng. Process, (2011). [Google Scholar]
  16. Alex English. Preliminary tests on charcoal making pyrolysis gas burners – high performance combustion with a simple technology. Energy for Sustainable Development, 6, 2. (2002). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. M.M. Rahman, M. Awang, B.S. Mohosina, W.B. Kamaruzzaman, Wan Nik and C.M.C. Adnan. Waste Palm Shell Converted to High Efficient Activated Carbon by Chemical Activation Method and Its Adsorption Capacity Tested by Water Filtration. APCBEE Procedia, 1, 293–298 (2012). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.