Open Access
Issue
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 76, 2016
20th International Conference on Circuits, Systems, Communications and Computers (CSCC 2016)
Article Number 04014
Number of page(s) 7
Section Computers
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/20167604014
Published online 21 October 2016
  1. M. Endsley, “Design and Evaluation for Situation Awareness Enhancement,” w Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  2. M. R. Endsley, D. J. Garland, Situation Awareness Analysis and Measurement, CRC Press, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  3. M. Chmielewski, “Ontology Applications for Achieving Situation Awareness in Military Decision Support Systems,” Lecture Notes in Computer Science, nr DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-04441-0_46, pp. 528–539, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  4. NATO, NATO Fiendly Force Interoperability standard, STANAG 5527. [Google Scholar]
  5. CEN WS/ISDEM, Definition of the OASIS Tactical Situation Object, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  6. CEN, Disaster and emergency management - Shared situation awareness - Part1: Message structure, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  7. M. G. D. Endsley, Situation Awareness Analysis and Measurement: Analysis and Measurement, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  8. M. Chmielewski, “Data fusion based on ontology model for common operational picture using OpenMap and Jena semantic framework,” w Proceedings of the Military Communications and Information Systems Conference, Cracow, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  9. NATO, NATO Common Operational Picture (NCOP) - NC3A, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  10. M. Chmielewski, A. Gałka, “Semantic Battlespace Data Mapping Using Tactical Symbology,” Advances in Intelligent Information and Database Systems, DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-12090-9_14, pp. 157–168, 2010. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. W3C, Web Service Glossary, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  12. “Shared situation awareness – Part1: Message structure,” CEN. [Google Scholar]
  13. M. J. Zieniewicz; D. C. Johnson; C. Wong; J. D. Flatt, “The Evolution of Army Wearable Computers”, IEEE, Pervasive Computing, vol.1, no. 4, pp. 30–40, 2002, doi:10.1109/MPRV.2002.1158276 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. K. Frącik, New technologies and means of combat shaping modern military operations, Journal of KONBiN 3(19), 2011, ISSN 1895–8281 [Google Scholar]
  15. N.L. Clifton Jr., D.W. Copeland, The Land Warrior Soldier System: A Case Study for the Acquisition of Soldier Systems, Monterey, California, MBA Professional Report, 2008 [Google Scholar]
  16. FELIN soldier system, Sagem Défense Sécurité brochure, available online, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  17. FIST – Future Infantry Soldier Technology, http://www.army-technology.com/projects/fist/ [Google Scholar]
  18. M. Chmielewski, et.al. Development of Operational Picture in DSS Using Distributed SOA Based Environment, Tactical Networks and Handhelds; Information Systems Architecture and Technology: Selected Aspects of Communication and Computational Systems, 2014, Wrocław, ISBN/ISSN: 978-83-7493-856-3 [Google Scholar]
  19. S.A. Weis, RFID (Radio Frequency Identification): Principles and Applications, 2007, MIT CSAIL [Google Scholar]
  20. I. Angell, J. Kietzmann, RFID and the end of cash?. Communications of the ACM 49 (12): 90–96. 2006, doi:10.1145/1183236.1183237. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.