Open Access
MATEC Web of Conferences
Volume 22, 2015
International Conference on Engineering Technology and Application (ICETA 2015)
Article Number 05015
Number of page(s) 5
Section Chemical and Industrial Technology
Published online 09 July 2015
  1. Li, C. L., Wang, Z.Y. & Li, B. C., et al. 2002. Latest Progress and Research Prospect of Tray. Journal of Hebei University of Technology. 31(1): 22. [Google Scholar]
  2. Wang, S. F. & Xiang, S. G. 2014. Application and research progress of valve trays. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress. 33(7): 1677–1696. [Google Scholar]
  3. Liu, D. X. 2008. CFD Modeling of Hydraulics and Mass Transfer of Distillation Trays and Experimental Studies of New Tray. Tianjin: Tianjin University. [Google Scholar]
  4. Zhang, P., Li, Y. X. & Qin, R., et al. 2014. Three-Dimension Numeric Simulation of Liquid Flow on Oblique Sieve Tray. Journal of Chemical Engineering of Chinese Universities. 28(6): 1217–1222. [Google Scholar]
  5. Wang, X. L. 2002. Three-dimensional fluid field and mass transfer simulation on distillation trays. China: Tianjin University. [Google Scholar]
  6. Krishna, R. 1999. CFD simulations of sieve tray hydro-dynamics. Chem. Engng. Res. Design, Trans. I. Chem. E. 77: 639–646. [Google Scholar]
  7. Gao, C.H., Jiang, K. & Zheng, S.Z, et al. 2012. CFD simulation of liquid flow field on double-pass overflow combined trapezoid spray tray. Chemical Engineering (China). 40(4):62–66. [Google Scholar]
  8. Guo, Y. F., Liu, H. & Chen, B. H., et al. 2004. Numerical computation for turbulent flow of two phases on a sieve tray. Journal of Beijing University of Chemical Technology. 1(1): 2. [Google Scholar]
  9. Wang, W.W., Li, S.Y., & Li, J.L. 2012. Experimental Determination of Bubble Size Distributions in Laboratory Scale Sieve Tray with Mesh. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research. 51 (20): 7067–7072. [Google Scholar]
  10. Sundar, R. & Tan, R. B. 1999. A model for bubble-to-jet transition at a submerged orifice. Chem. Eng. Sci. l8(54):4053–4060. [Google Scholar]
  11. Zhang, M. Q. &Yu, G. C. 1994. Simulation of two dimensional liquid phase flow on a distillation tray. Chinese J. ChemEng. 2(2): 63. [Google Scholar]
  12. Calderbank, P. H. & Rennie, J. 1962. The physical properties of foams and froths formed on sieve plates. Trans. Instn. Chem. Engrs. 40(1): 3–12. [Google Scholar]
  13. Hofhuis, P.A. & Zuiderweg, F.J. 1979. Sieve plates: dispersion density and flow regimes. Instn. Chem. Engr. Symp. Ser. 2(56): 21–26. [Google Scholar]
  14. Yakhot, V. & Orzag, S. A. 1986. Renormalization group analysis of turbulence. I. basic theory. Journal of Scientific Computing. 1(1): 3–51. [Google Scholar]
  15. Locker, M. J.& Kirkpatrick, R. D. 1979. Uddin M. S. Froth regime point efficiency for gas-film controlled mass transfer on a two-dimensional sieve tray. Trans. Inst. Chem Eng. 57:25–30. [Google Scholar]
  16. aten, J. M. 2000. Modeling sieve tray hydraulics using computational fluid dynamics. Chem. Eng. Jour. 77(3): 143–151. [Google Scholar]
  17. Gautreaux, M.F. & O’Connell H.E.1955. Effect of length of liquid path on plate efficiency. Chem. Eng. Prog. 51(5): 232–237. [Google Scholar]
  18. Yu, G. Z. & Gu, F. Z.1981. Simulation and efficiency of large tray (II)—Two dimensional fixed number. Journal of Chemical Industry and Engineering (China). 32(2):97–109. [Google Scholar]
  19. GetyeGesit, N. K. & Chuang, K. T. 2003. CFD Modeling of flow patterns and Hydraulics of commercial-scale sieve tray. AIChE J. 49(4): 910–925. [Google Scholar]
  20. Li, L. C., Wang, J. J. & Gu, X. P., et al. 2008.CFD simulation of gas holdup and gas-liquid flow in bubble columns. Science paper Online. 3(12): 885–889. [Google Scholar]
  21. Colbum, A. P. 1936. Effect of entrainment on plate efficiency in distillation. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry. 8(5): 526–544. [Google Scholar]
  22. Liu, M. S., Yang, F. & Dong, Q. W., et al. 2010. Study of the Influence of Wall Surface Functions in Simulating a Fluid Laterally Sweeping a Tube Bundle. Journal of Engineering for Thermal Energy and Power. 25(5): 497–501. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.