Open Access
Issue
MATEC Web of Conferences
Volume 22, 2015
International Conference on Engineering Technology and Application (ICETA 2015)
Article Number 05015
Number of page(s) 5
Section Chemical and Industrial Technology
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/20152205015
Published online 09 July 2015
  1. Li, C. L., Wang, Z.Y. & Li, B. C., et al. 2002. Latest Progress and Research Prospect of Tray. Journal of Hebei University of Technology. 31(1): 22.
  2. Wang, S. F. & Xiang, S. G. 2014. Application and research progress of valve trays. Chemical Industry and Engineering Progress. 33(7): 1677–1696.
  3. Liu, D. X. 2008. CFD Modeling of Hydraulics and Mass Transfer of Distillation Trays and Experimental Studies of New Tray. Tianjin: Tianjin University.
  4. Zhang, P., Li, Y. X. & Qin, R., et al. 2014. Three-Dimension Numeric Simulation of Liquid Flow on Oblique Sieve Tray. Journal of Chemical Engineering of Chinese Universities. 28(6): 1217–1222.
  5. Wang, X. L. 2002. Three-dimensional fluid field and mass transfer simulation on distillation trays. China: Tianjin University.
  6. Krishna, R. 1999. CFD simulations of sieve tray hydro-dynamics. Chem. Engng. Res. Design, Trans. I. Chem. E. 77: 639–646. [CrossRef]
  7. Gao, C.H., Jiang, K. & Zheng, S.Z, et al. 2012. CFD simulation of liquid flow field on double-pass overflow combined trapezoid spray tray. Chemical Engineering (China). 40(4):62–66.
  8. Guo, Y. F., Liu, H. & Chen, B. H., et al. 2004. Numerical computation for turbulent flow of two phases on a sieve tray. Journal of Beijing University of Chemical Technology. 1(1): 2.
  9. Wang, W.W., Li, S.Y., & Li, J.L. 2012. Experimental Determination of Bubble Size Distributions in Laboratory Scale Sieve Tray with Mesh. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research. 51 (20): 7067–7072. [CrossRef]
  10. Sundar, R. & Tan, R. B. 1999. A model for bubble-to-jet transition at a submerged orifice. Chem. Eng. Sci. l8(54):4053–4060. [CrossRef]
  11. Zhang, M. Q. &Yu, G. C. 1994. Simulation of two dimensional liquid phase flow on a distillation tray. Chinese J. ChemEng. 2(2): 63.
  12. Calderbank, P. H. & Rennie, J. 1962. The physical properties of foams and froths formed on sieve plates. Trans. Instn. Chem. Engrs. 40(1): 3–12.
  13. Hofhuis, P.A. & Zuiderweg, F.J. 1979. Sieve plates: dispersion density and flow regimes. Instn. Chem. Engr. Symp. Ser. 2(56): 21–26.
  14. Yakhot, V. & Orzag, S. A. 1986. Renormalization group analysis of turbulence. I. basic theory. Journal of Scientific Computing. 1(1): 3–51. [CrossRef] [MathSciNet]
  15. Locker, M. J.& Kirkpatrick, R. D. 1979. Uddin M. S. Froth regime point efficiency for gas-film controlled mass transfer on a two-dimensional sieve tray. Trans. Inst. Chem Eng. 57:25–30.
  16. aten, J. M. 2000. Modeling sieve tray hydraulics using computational fluid dynamics. Chem. Eng. Jour. 77(3): 143–151. [CrossRef]
  17. Gautreaux, M.F. & O’Connell H.E.1955. Effect of length of liquid path on plate efficiency. Chem. Eng. Prog. 51(5): 232–237.
  18. Yu, G. Z. & Gu, F. Z.1981. Simulation and efficiency of large tray (II)—Two dimensional fixed number. Journal of Chemical Industry and Engineering (China). 32(2):97–109.
  19. GetyeGesit, N. K. & Chuang, K. T. 2003. CFD Modeling of flow patterns and Hydraulics of commercial-scale sieve tray. AIChE J. 49(4): 910–925.
  20. Li, L. C., Wang, J. J. & Gu, X. P., et al. 2008.CFD simulation of gas holdup and gas-liquid flow in bubble columns. Science paper Online. 3(12): 885–889.
  21. Colbum, A. P. 1936. Effect of entrainment on plate efficiency in distillation. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry. 8(5): 526–544.
  22. Liu, M. S., Yang, F. & Dong, Q. W., et al. 2010. Study of the Influence of Wall Surface Functions in Simulating a Fluid Laterally Sweeping a Tube Bundle. Journal of Engineering for Thermal Energy and Power. 25(5): 497–501.

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.