Open Access
Issue
MATEC Web of Conferences
Volume 15, 2014
Building Surveying, Facilities Management and Engineering Conference (BSFMEC 2014)
Article Number 01009
Number of page(s) 8
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/20141501009
Published online 19 August 2014
  1. Song, L. Mohamed, Y. and AbouRizk, S. M., 2006. Evaluating Contractor’s Early Involvement in Design, AACE International Transactions. [Google Scholar]
  2. Arditi, D., Elhassan, A., and Toklu, Y. C., 2002. Constructability analysis in the design firm. J. Constr. Eng. Manage., 128(2): 117–126. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Construction Industry Institute (CII), 1996. The partnering process-Its benefits, implementation and measurement. Publication 102-11, Austin, Tex. [Google Scholar]
  4. Pocock, J. B., Kuennen, S. T., Gambatese, J., and Rauschkolb, J., 2006. Constructability state of practice report Constr. Eng. Manage., 132(4): 373–383. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Khalfan, M. M.A., Anumba, C. J. and Carrillo P. M., 2001. Development of a readiness assessment model for concurrent engineering in construction. Int. Journal, 8(3): 223–239. [Google Scholar]
  6. Popkova, E.G., Akopova, E.S., Alekhina, Yu. I., Dubova, J. N., Popova, I. A., Avdeeva and I. Yu. Proskurina , 2013. Methodology of Development of Strategy of Development of Economic Systems. World Applied Sciences Journal, 26(4): 489–493. [Google Scholar]
  7. Kupreschenko, N.P., 2005. Economic security. World Applied Sciences Journal 31(6): 1033–1038 [Google Scholar]
  8. Tumin, V.M., A.G. Koryakov and E.P. Nikiforova, 2013. The Main Factors of Socio-Ecological-Economic Stability and Development of IndustrialEnterprises. World Applied Sciences Journal, 25(6): 945–949. [Google Scholar]
  9. Baiden, B. K., Price A. D. F., and Dainty A. R. J., 2006. The extent of team integration within construction projects. International Journal of Project Management, 24(1):13–23. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. Egan, J., 2002. Accelerating Change, Strategic Forum for Construction, London. [Google Scholar]
  11. Anumba, C.J., Baugh, C., Khalfan, M. M.A., 2002. Organisation Structure to Support Concurrent Engineering to Construction, Industrial Management and Data Systems, 102/5:260–270. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Suan, C. L., and Mohd Nasurdin, A., Do Human Resource Management Practices Affect Employees’ Service-Oriented Organizational Citizenship Behavior? Evidence from the Malaysian Hotel Industry, World Applied Sciences Journal 31(2): 253–266, 2014 [Google Scholar]
  13. Komarov, S. V., 2014, Management of Enterprise Based on Matrix of Profitability and Customer Loyalty, World Applied Sciences Journal 31(6): 1033–1038, 2014. ISSN 1818-4952 [Google Scholar]
  14. Ferris, P.U., T. Bendl Neil and Philip J. Pfeiffer, 2009. In: Market Indicators: Over 50 indicators those are important to know each manager Balance Business. World Applied Sciences Journal 31(6): 1033–1038, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  15. Komarov, S.W., 2011. Schlusselprobleme Des Produktinnovationsmarketing, In: Anforderung an Strukturen und Instrumente in der Wirtschaft vor dem Hintergrund Globalisierung: Internationale wissenschaftliche Tagunden 26 und 27.05.2011 in Bernburg-Strenzfeld: Bernburg-Strenzfeld, 2011. S.8. Cited in World Applied Sciences Journal 31(6): 1033–1038, 2014. ISSN 1818-4952 [Google Scholar]
  16. Gupta S. and D. Lehmann, 2007. “Gold” customers. Are the clients of the money that you spend on them ?/Per. from English. St. Petersburg: Peter, S. 112–113. World Applied Sciences Journal 31(6): 1033–1038, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  17. Gupta, S., Donald R. Lehmann, 2005. Managing Customers as Investments. The Strategic Value of Customers in the Long Run. N.Y. Pearsom Education Inc., Wharton School Publishing. R. 206. World Applied Sciences Journal 31(6): 1033–1038, 2014. ISSN 1818-4952 [Google Scholar]
  18. Schellekens, P., 2009, “Reposition for Growth”, Malaysia Economic Monitor [Google Scholar]
  19. Abadi, M., 2005. Issues and Challenges in Communication within Design Teams in the Construction Industry. PhD Thesis, University of Manchester, UK. [Google Scholar]
  20. Dainty, A. R.J., Briscoe, G.H. and Millett, S.J., 2001. Subcontractor perspectives on supply chain alliances. Construction Management and Economics, 19(8): 841–848. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. Rowlinson, S.,1999. A definition of Procurement systems- A guide to Best Practice in Construction, S. Rowlinson, McDermott P., (eds) -E& FN Spon. [Google Scholar]
  22. Egan, J., 1998. Rethinking construction, report of the construction task force on the scope for improving the quality and efficiency of UK construction industry, Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions, London. [Google Scholar]
  23. Anumba, CA, Kamara, J. M. and Evbuomwan, N. F. O., 1997. Construction in the UK Petrochemical Industry- Aspects of Concurrent Engineering Practice in Adams T. M (Editor). Proceedings of Fourth Congress Computing in Civil Engineering, June 16-18, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania,114–121. [Google Scholar]
  24. Orr, A.J. and McKenzie, P., 1992. Programme and project management in BT. British Telecommunication Engineering, (January), 10. [Google Scholar]
  25. Russell, Jeffrey S., 1994. Comparative analysis of Three Constructability Approaches. ASCE Journal of Construction Engineering & Management, Vol. 120. No 1 Mar. [Google Scholar]
  26. Evbuomwan, N.F.O., and Anumba, C.J., 1998. An integrated framework for concurrent life-cycle design and construction, Advances in Engineering Software, Vol. 29 (7-9). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. Jha, K.N. and Iyer, K.C., 2006. Critical determinants of project coordination, International Journal of Project Management, Publisher Elsevier UK 24(4). [Google Scholar]
  28. Love, P.E.D. Irani, Z. Edwards, D.J., 2004. A seamless supply chain management model for construction, Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, Vol. 9(1): 43–56. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. Pardu, W., 1996. Managing change in a project environment, CMI, Volume 6. [Google Scholar]
  30. Gunasekaran, A. and Love, P.E.D., 1998. Concurrent engineering: a multi-disciplinary approach for construction. Logistics Information Management 11(5):295–300. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. Latham, M., 1994. Constructing the Team, Final report on joint review of procurement and contractual agreements in the UK construction industry. HMSO, London. [Google Scholar]
  32. Kwakye A, .A., 1997. Fast tracking construction, Occasional Paper, 4(6), UK CIOB. [Google Scholar]
  33. Nelson, M.L., 2004 The Applicability of the Integrate to Innovate (i2i) model in Supply Chain Management (SCM) in Facilities Management (FM).PhD Thesis, University of Salford, UK. [Google Scholar]
  34. Cox, A. and Townsend, M., 1997. Latham as Half-Way House: A Relational Competence Approach to Better Practice in Construction Procurement. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 4(2):143–158. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  35. Mendelsohn, P., 1998. Teamwork-The Key to Productivity Journal of Management in Engineering, Vol. 14(l):22–25. [Google Scholar]
  36. Harmon, K. M. J., 2003. Conflicts between Owner and Contractors: Proposed Intervention Process. Journal of Management in Engineering, 19(3): 121–125. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  37. Nawi, M.N.M., Lee, A. and Nor, K.M., 2011. Barriers to the implementation of Industrialiased Building System (IBS) in Malaysia. The Built and Human Environment Review: online journal, Volume 4, University of Salford, United Kingdom. [Google Scholar]
  38. Newcombe, R., 1997. Procurement Paths – a Cultural/ Political Perspective. In Procurement – A Key to Innovation, 523–534. Canada: CIB Proceeding. [Google Scholar]
  39. Clarke, A., 1999. A practical use of key success factors to improve the effectiveness of project management. International Journal of Project Management, 17(3):139–145. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  40. Mohamad, I. M., 1999. The Application of Concurrent Engineering Philosophy to the Construction Industry. Thesis PhD, Loughborough University. [Google Scholar]
  41. Ngowi, A. B., 2000. Construction procurement based on concurrent engineering. Logistics Information Management, vol. 13(6): 361–368. [Google Scholar]
  42. Kong, A.T. and Gray, J., 2006. Problems with Traditional Procurement in the Malaysian Construction Industry – A Survey, In Runeson, Goran and Best, Rick, Eds. Proceedings Australasian Universities Building Educators Association Annual Conference, pp. 1–21, University of Technology, Sydney. [Google Scholar]
  43. Muya, M., Price, A.D.F., and Thorpe, A., 1999. Contractor’s supplier management, In Bowen, P. and Kindle, R., eds. Proceedings of CIB W55165 Joint Triennial Symposium, Customer Satisfaction: A Focus for Research and Practice in Construction. 5-10 September, Cape Town. [Google Scholar]
  44. Konchar M. and Sanvido, V., 1998. Comparisions of US. Project Delivery Systems. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management Vol. 124 (6), pp 435–444 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  45. Newton, A. J., 1995. The planning and management of detailed building design. Ph.D thesis, Department of Civil and Building Engineering, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK. [Google Scholar]
  46. Agapiou, A., Flanagan, R., Norman, G. and Notman, D., 1998. The changing role of builders merchants in the construction supply chain. Construction Management and Economics, 16:351–361. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  47. Luiten, G. T. and Tolman, F. P., 1997. Automating Communication in Civil Engineering Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Vol. 123(2):113–120. [Google Scholar]
  48. Chan, D. W. M. and Kumaraswamy, M. M., 1997. A comparative study of causes of time overruns in Hong Kong construction projects, International Journal of ProjectManagement, 15, (1):55–63. [Google Scholar]
  49. Zaneldin, E., Hegazy, T. and Grierson, D., 2001. Improving Design Coordination for Building Projects, 11: A Collaborative System. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management 127(4): 330–336. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  50. Hartman, F., 2000. Don’t park your brain outside, PMI, Newtown Square, Pa. [Google Scholar]
  51. Tenah, K. A., 2001. Cost Engineering, 43(1): 30–36. [Google Scholar]
  52. Smith, J., O’Keffle, N., Georgiou, J., Love, P.E.D., 2004. procurement of Construction Facilities; A case study of design management within a design and construct organisation. Journal of facilities, Vol. 22(½):26–34. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  53. Nawi, M.N.M., Lee, A., Kamar, K.A.M.; and Hamid, Z.A., 2012. Critical Success Factors for Improving Team Integration in IBS Construction Projects: The Malaysian Case. Malaysia Construction Research Journal (MCRJ), 10(1), 44–62. [Google Scholar]
  54. Hegazy, T., Zaneldin, E., and Grierson, D., 2001. Improving Design Coordination for Building Projects, I: Information Model. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management 127(4), July/ August, pp. 322–329. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  55. Gardiner, P. D. and Simmons, J. E. L., 1998. Conflict in Small and Medium-Sized Projects: Case of Partnering to the Rescue. Journal of Management in Engineering, 14(1): 35–40. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  56. Alashwal, M. A., Abdul Rahman, H., & Abdul Mutalib, Beksin, A. M., 2011. Knowledge sharing in a fragmented construction industry: On the hindsight, Scientific Research and Essays, Vol. 6(7), pp. 1530–1536. [Google Scholar]
  57. Dulaimia, M. F., Linga, F. Y. Y., Oforia, G., & De Silvaa, N., 2006. Enhancing integration and innovation in construction, Building Research & Information Volume 30, Issue 4, pp. 237–247. [Google Scholar]
  58. Wisconsin, 2008. ‘Literature Review’, Writing Studio, Duke University [Google Scholar]
  59. Nawi, M. N. M., Lee, A., Azman, M.N.A., and Kamar, K.A.M., 2014. Fragmentation Issue in Malaysian Industrialised Building System (IBS) Projects. Journal of Engineering Science & Technology (JESTEC), Vol. 9(1), 97–106. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.