Open Access
Issue |
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 403, 2024
SUBLime Conference 2024 – Towards the Next Generation of Sustainable Masonry Systems: Mortars, Renders, Plasters and Other Challenges
|
|
---|---|---|
Article Number | 07015 | |
Number of page(s) | 19 | |
Section | Conservation, Repair and Strengthening | |
DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/202440307015 | |
Published online | 16 September 2024 |
- A. Lo Monaco et al., “Seismic assessment of typical historical masonry churches in the Banat region, Romania - Part II,” Procedia Structural Integrity, vol. 44, pp. 2044–2051, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.prostr.2023.01.261. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- M. Mosoarca and V. Gioncu, “Historical wooden churches from Banat Region, Romania. Damages: Modern consolidation solutions,” J Cult Herit, vol. 14, no. 3 SUPPL, 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.culher.2012.11.020. [Google Scholar]
- M. Mosoarca, M. Fofiu, and I. Onescu, “Failure mechanism of historic churches in Gorj county for shallow seismic action,” Eng Fail Anal, vol. 152, Oct. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2023.107502. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- L. Petrescu, F. Borleanu, M. Radulian, A. Ismail-Zadeh, and L. Maţenco, “Tectonic regimes and stress patterns in the Vrancea Seismic Zone: Insights into intermediate-depth earthquake nests in locked collisional settings,” Tectonophysics, vol. 799, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.tecto.2020.228688. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- F. Pavel, R. Vacareanu, A. Aldea, and C. Arion, “Source Effects on the Spectral Characteristics of Strong Ground Motions Recorded in Bucharest Area During Vrancea Earthquakes of 1986 and 1990,” Journal of Earthquake Engineering, vol. 17, no. 8, pp. 1192–1211, Nov. 2013, doi: 10.1080/13632469.2013.830997. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- A. Lo Monaco et al., “Seismic Assessment of Typical Historical Masonry Churches in Banat region, Romania - Part I,” Procedia Structural Integrity, vol. 44, pp. 2058–2065, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.prostr.2023.01.263. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- S. J. Menegon, H. H. Tsang, E. Lumantarna, N. T. K. Lam, J. L. Wilson, and E. F. Gad, “Framework for seismic vulnerability assessment of reinforced concrete buildings in Australia,” Australian Journal of Structural Engineering, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 143–158, Apr. 2019, doi: 10.1080/13287982.2019.1611034. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Y. Endo, J. Magi, M. Marotto, and Y. Sakai, “Seismic Analysis of a Single-Nave Church Standing on Moderate Sloping Ground: A Church Severely Damaged By the 2009 L’Aquila Earthquake,” 2024, pp. 1159–1169. doi: 10.1007/978-3-031-39603-8_93. [Google Scholar]
- E. Paci, “Seismic Effects on the Stone Masonry of Rubik Church in Albania: Interaction Modeling of Different Masonry Panel Types,” International Society for the Study of Vernacular Settlements, vol. 10, no. 8, pp. 191–212, Aug. 2023, doi: 10.61275/ISVSej-2023-10-08-14. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- M. Mirra, A. Gerardini, and G. Ravenshorst, “Application of timber-based techniques for seismic retrofit and architectural restoration of a wooden roof in a stone masonry church,” Procedia Structural Integrity, vol. 44, pp. 1856–1863, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.prostr.2023.01.237. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- A. C. Altunişik, M. Günaydin, E. Ertürk Atmaca, A. F. Genç, F. Y. Okur, and B. Sevim, “Experimental measurement-based FE model updating and seismic response of Santa Maria Church and its guesthouse building,” J Civ Struct Health Monit, vol. 14, no. 3, pp. 663–692, Mar. 2024, doi: 10.1007/s13349-023-00747-9. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- G. Martinez, J. Jara, B. Olmos, L. Mejia, and L. Alejo, “Simplified Seismic Assessment of a 16th Century Church and Cloister in Morelia, Mexico,” International Journal of Architectural Heritage, vol. 17, no. 12, pp. 2036–2053, Dec. 2023, doi: 10.1080/15583058.2022.2097032. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- “Romanian Design Code P100-3/2019.” [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.