Open Access
Issue
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 403, 2024
SUBLime Conference 2024 – Towards the Next Generation of Sustainable Masonry Systems: Mortars, Renders, Plasters and Other Challenges
Article Number 07016
Number of page(s) 22
Section Conservation, Repair and Strengthening
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/202440307016
Published online 16 September 2024
  1. A. Lo Monaco et al., “Seismic assessment of typical historical masonry churches in the Banat region, Romania - Part II,” in Procedia Structural Integrity, Elsevier B.V., 2022, pp. 2044–2051. doi: 10.1016/j.prostr.2023.01.261. [Google Scholar]
  2. M. Mosoarca and V. Gioncu, “Historical wooden churches from Banat Region, Romania. Damages: Modern consolidation solutions,” J Cult Herit, vol. 14, no. 3 SUPPL, 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.culher.2012.11.020. [Google Scholar]
  3. M. Mosoarca, M. Fofiu, and I. Onescu, “Failure mechanism of historic churches in Gorj county for shallow seismic action,” Eng Fail Anal, vol. 152, Oct. 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2023.107502. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. L. Petrescu, F. Borleanu, M. Radulian, A. Ismail-Zadeh, and L. Maţenco, “Tectonic regimes and stress patterns in the Vrancea Seismic Zone: Insights into intermediate-depth earthquake nests in locked collisional settings,” Tectonophysics, vol. 799, Jan. 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.tecto.2020.228688. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. F. Pavel, R. Vacareanu, A. Aldea, and C. Arion, “Source Effects on the Spectral Characteristics of Strong Ground Motions Recorded in Bucharest Area During Vrancea Earthquakes of 1986 and 1990,” Journal of Earthquake Engineering, vol. 17, no. 8, pp. 1192–1211, Nov. 2013, doi: 10.1080/13632469.2013.830997. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. A. Lo Monaco et al., “Seismic Assessment of Typical Historical Masonry Churches in Banat region, Romania - Part I,” in Procedia Structural Integrity, Elsevier B.V., 2022, pp. 2058–2065. doi: 10.1016/j.prostr.2023.01.263. [Google Scholar]
  7. S. J. Menegon, H. H. Tsang, E. Lumantarna, N. T. K. Lam, J. L. Wilson, and E. F. Gad, “Framework for seismic vulnerability assessment of reinforced concrete buildings in Australia,” Australian Journal of Structural Engineering, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 143–158, Apr. 2019, doi: 10.1080/13287982.2019.1611034. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. I. Fierascu, R. C. Fierascu, and R. Radvan, “Romanian Traditional Buildings—Conservation of a National Legacy,” MDPI AG, Oct. 2019, p. 48. doi: 10.3390/proceedings2019029048. [Google Scholar]
  9. D. Bell, “Post-Ceauşescu Conservation in Romania,” Journal of Architectural Conservation, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 46–66, Jan. 2001, doi: 10.1080/13556207.2001.10785302. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. M. Mosoarca and G. Victor, “Structural safety of historical buildings made of reinforced concrete, from Banat region - Romania,” J Cult Herit, vol. 14, no. 3 SUPPL, 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.culher.2012.11.015. [Google Scholar]
  11. A. G. Simion, A. M. Gramescu, and B. D. Pericleanu, “Principles regarding integrated conservation of historical and archaeological sites to capitalize in the urban location,” IOP Conf Ser Mater Sci Eng, vol. 1138, no. 1, p. 012039, Apr. 2021, doi: 10.1088/1757-899x/1138/1/012039. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. “Romanian Design Code P100-1/2019.” [Google Scholar]
  13. “Code CR-1-1-3/2012 ‘Evaluation of the action of snow on constructions’, ROmania .” [Google Scholar]
  14. “Design Code CR-1-1-4/2012 ‘Evaluation of wind action on constructions.’” [Google Scholar]
  15. Toma Radulescu, BISERICA SFINTII ARCHANGHELI. MITROPOLIA OLTENIEI, 2016. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.