Open Access
Issue
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 403, 2024
SUBLime Conference 2024 – Towards the Next Generation of Sustainable Masonry Systems: Mortars, Renders, Plasters and Other Challenges
Article Number 06002
Number of page(s) 8
Section Sustainability and Circularity
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/202440306002
Published online 16 September 2024
  1. R.-M. Andrew, Global CO2 emissions from cement production, 1928–2017. Earth System Science Data 10(4), 2213-2239 (2018). https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-10-195-2018 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. F.-N. Costa, D.-V. Ribeiro, Reduction in CO2 emissions during production of cement, with partial replacement of traditional raw materials by civil construction waste (CCW). J. Clean. Prod. 276, 123302 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.123302 [Google Scholar]
  3. R. Shamass, O. Rispoli, V. Limbachiya, R. Kovacs, Mechanical and GWP assessment of concrete using Blast Furnace Slag, Silica Fume and recycled aggregate, Case Stud. Constr. Mater. 18, e02164 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2023.e02164 [Google Scholar]
  4. A. Gholampour, J. Zheng, T. Ozbakkaloglu, Development of waste-based concretes containing foundry sand, recycled fine aggregate, ground granulated blast furnace slag and fly ash, Constr. Build. Mater. 267, 121004 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121004 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. I. Sultana, G.M.S. Islam, Potential of ladle furnace slag as supplementary cementitious material in concrete, Case Stud. Constr. Mater. 18, e02141 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2023.e02141. [Google Scholar]
  6. K.-W. Kim, K.-T. Park, F. Ates, H.-G. Kim, B.-H. Woo, Effect of pretreated biomass fly ash on the mechanical properties and durability of cement mortar. Case Stud. Constr. Mater. 18, e01754 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2022.e01754 [Google Scholar]
  7. W. Piasta, M. Lukawska, The effect of sewage sludge ash on properties of cement composites. Procedia Eng. 161, 1018-1024 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.08.842 [Google Scholar]
  8. X. Li, D. Qin, Y. Hu, W. Ahmad, A. Ahmad, F. Aslam, P. Joyklad. A systematic review of waste materials in cement-based composites for construction applications. J. Build. Eng. 45, 103447 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.103447 [Google Scholar]
  9. A. Kylili, P.-A. Fokaides, Policy trends for the sustainability assessment of construction materials: A review. Sustainable Cities and Society, 35, 280-288 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2017.08.013 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. T. Dyllick, K. Hockerts, Beyond the business case for corporate sustainability. Bus. Strategy Environ. 11(2), 130-141 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.323 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. R. Hischier, B. Weidema, H.-J. Althaus, C. Bauer, G. Doka, R. Dones, T. Nemecek, Implementation of life cycle impact assessment methods. Final report Ecoinvent v2, 2. (2010) [Google Scholar]
  12. Sustainability, PRé SimaPro database manual Methods library SimaPro Utrecht, The Netherlands. (2020) [Google Scholar]
  13. ISO (2006). EN ISO 14040:2006: Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Principles and frameworks. [Google Scholar]
  14. Ecoinvent, Zurich, Switzerland. [Google Scholar]
  15. W. Li, M. Winter, S. Kara, C. Herrmann, Eco-efficiency of manufacturing processes: a grinding case, CIRP Ann. 61, 245–256 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2012.03.029 [Google Scholar]
  16. M.-A. Huijbregts, Z.-J. Steinmann, P. Elshout, et al., ReCiPe 2016: a harmonized life cycle impact assessment method at midpoint and endpoint level report I: characterization. (2016). [Google Scholar]
  17. O. Edenhofer, R. Pichs-Madruga, Y. Sokona, K. Seyboth, S. Kadner, T. Zwickel, … & Matschoss, P. (Eds.). Renewable energy sources and climate change mitigation: Special report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press. (2011). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.