EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 403 (2024) MATEC Web Conf., 403 (2024) 05007 References
Open Access
Issue
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 403, 2024
SUBLime Conference 2024 – Towards the Next Generation of Sustainable Masonry Systems: Mortars, Renders, Plasters and Other Challenges
Article Number 05007
Number of page(s) 16
Section Structural and Functional Performance
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/202440305007
Published online 16 September 2024
  1. D. A. Pohoryles, D. A. Bournas, F. Da Porto, A. Caprino, G. Santarsiero, and T. Triantafillou, Integrated seismic and energy retrofitting of existing buildings: A state-of-the-art review. J. Build. Eng. 61, 105274 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2022.105274 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. M. Economidou, B. Atanasiu, C. Despret, J. Maio, I. Nolte, and O. Rapf, Europe’s buildings under the microscope – a country-by-country review of the energy performance of buildings. Brussels: Buildings Performance Institute Europe; Bpie 35 (2011) [Google Scholar]
  3. A. Marini, C. Passoni, A. Belleri, F. Feroldi, M. Preti, G. Metelli, P. Riva, E. Giuriani, and G. Plizzari, Combining seismic retrofit with energy refurbishment for the sustainable renovation of RC buildings: a proof of concept. Eur. J. Environ. Civ. Eng. 26, 2475 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1080/19648189.2017.1363665 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. G. M. Calvi, L. Sousa, and C. Ruggeri, Energy Efficiency and Seismic Resilience: A Common Approach. in Multi-Hazard Approaches to Civ. Infrastruct. Eng. (Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2016), pp. 165–208. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-29713-2_9 [Google Scholar]
  5. T. C. Guimarães, O. da F. M. Gomes, O. M. Oliveira de Araújo, R. Tadeu Lopes, M. Y. R. Da-Gloria, R. D. Toledo Filho, E. Koenders, A. Caggiano, C. Mankel, M. Nazari Sam, R. G. Mendes de Andrade, and S. R. Ferreira, PCM-Impregnated Textile-Reinforced Cementitious Composite for Thermal Energy Storage. Textiles 3, 98 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3390/textiles3010008 [Google Scholar]
  6. D. A. Bournas, Concurrent seismic and energy retrofitting of RC and masonry building envelopes using inorganic textile-based composites combined with insulation materials: A new concept. Compos. Part B Eng. 148, 166 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.04.002 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. C. Menna, L. Felicioni, P. Negro, A. Lupíšek, E. Romano, A. Prota, and P. Hájek, Review of methods for the combined assessment of seismic resilience and energy efficiency towards sustainable retrofitting of existing European buildings. Sustain. Cities Soc. 77, 103556 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.103556 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. E. Baek, D. A. Pohoryles, S. Kallioras, D. A. Bournas, H. Choi, and T. Kim, Innovative seismic and energy retrofitting of wall envelopes using prefabricated textile-reinforced concrete panels with an embedded capillary tube system. Eng. Struct. 265, 114453 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.114453 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. V. D. Fachinotti, F. Bre, C. Mankel, E. A. B. Koenders, and A. Caggiano, Optimization of Multilayered Walls for Building Envelopes Including PCM-Based Composites. Materials (Basel). 13, 2787 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13122787 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. M. Sam, A. Caggiano, L. Dubyey, J.-L. Dauvergne, and E. Koenders, Thermo-physical and mechanical investigation of cementitious composites enhanced with microencapsulated phase change materials for thermal energy storage. Constr. Build. Mater. 340, 127585 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2022.127585 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. C. Mankel, A. Caggiano, and E. Koenders, Thermal energy storage characterization of cementitious composites made with recycled brick aggregates containing PCM. Energy Build. 202, 109395 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2019.109395 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. I. Peralta, V. D. Fachinotti, E. A. B. Koenders, and A. Caggiano, Computational design of a Massive Solar-Thermal Collector enhanced with Phase Change Materials. Energy Build. 274, 112437 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2022.112437 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Y. A. Al-Salloum, N. A. Siddiqui, H. M. Elsanadedy, A. A. Abadel, and M. A. Aqel, Textile-Reinforced Mortar versus FRP as Strengthening Material for Seismically Deficient RC Beam-Column Joints. J. Compos. Constr. 15, 920 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000222 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. C. Papanicolaou, T. Triantafillou, and M. Lekka, Externally bonded grids as strengthening and seismic retrofitting materials of masonry panels. Constr. Build. Mater. 25, 504 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.07.018 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. M. Ponte, A. Penna, and R. Bento, In-plane cyclic tests of strengthened rubble stone masonry. Mater. Struct. 56, 41 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-023-02126-8 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. J. Donnini, V. Corinaldesi, and A. Nanni, FRCM Mechanical Properties Using Carbon Fabrics With Different Coating Treatments. in SP-305 Durab. Sustain. Concr. Struct. (American Concrete Institute, 2015), pp. 8.1-8.12. https://doi.org/10.14359/51688568 [Google Scholar]
  17. D. A. Bournas, P. V. Lontou, C. G. Papanicolaou, and T. C. Triantafillou, Textile-Reinforced Mortar versus Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Confinement in Reinforced Concrete Columns. ACI Struct. J. 104, 740 (2007). https://doi.org/10.14359/18956 [Google Scholar]
  18. L. N. Koutas, Z. Tetta, D. A. Bournas, and T. C. Triantafillou, Strengthening of Concrete Structures with Textile Reinforced Mortars: State-of-the-Art Review. J. 23, 3118001 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000882 [Google Scholar]
  19. D. A. Bournas and T. C. Triantafillou, Investigation of Bar Buckling in Columns Confined with Composite Material Jackets. in SP-275 Fiber-Reinforced Polym. Reinf. Concr. Struct. 10th Int. Symp. (American Concrete Institute, 2011), pp. 117–134. https://doi.org/10.14359/51682417 [Google Scholar]
  20. T. C. Triantafillou and C. G. Papanicolaou, Shear strengthening of reinforced concrete members with textile reinforced mortar (TRM) jackets. Mater. Struct. Constr. 39, 93 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-005-9034-3 [Google Scholar]
  21. S. M. Raoof and D. A. Bournas, TRM versus FRP in flexural strengthening of RC beams: Behaviour at high temperatures. Constr. Build. Mater. 154, 424 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.07.195 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. C. Menna, C. Del Vecchio, M. Di Ludovico, G. M. Mauro, F. Ascione, and A. Prota, Conceptual design of integrated seismic and energy retrofit interventions. J. Build. Eng. 38, 102190 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102190 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. A. Furtado, A. Arêde, and H. Rodrigues, The Effect of a Textile-Reinforced Mortar on the Flexural Response of Energy-Improved Infill Walls. J. Compos. Constr. 26, 4022047 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0001237 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. P. Gkournelos and T. Triantafillou, Integrated Structural and Energy Retrofitting of Masonry Walls: The Effect of In-Plane Damage on the Out-Of-Plane Response. in Lect. Notes Civ. Eng. (American Society of Civil Engineers, 2022), pp. 1819–1836. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-88166-5_157 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. L. Mercedes, E. Bernat-Maso, and L. Gil, In-plane cyclic loading of masonry walls strengthened by vegetal-fabric-reinforced cementitious matrix (FRCM) composites. Eng. Struct. 221, 111097 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.111097 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. L. A. S. Kouris and T. C. Triantafillou, State-of-the-art on strengthening of masonry structures with textile reinforced mortar (TRM). Constr. Build. Mater. 188, 1221 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.08.039 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. C. G. Papanicolaou, T. C. Triantafillou, M. Papathanasiou, and K. Karlos, Textile reinforced mortar (TRM) versus FRP as strengthening material of URM walls: out-of-plane cyclic loading. Mater. Struct. 41, 143 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-007-9226-0 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. National Research Council, Guide for the design and construction of externally bonded fibre reinforced inorganic matrix systems for strengthening existing structures. Guide for the Design and Construction of Externally Bonded Fibre Reinforced Inorganic Matrix Systems for Strengthening Existing Structures (2018) [Google Scholar]
  29. S. Cattari and S. Lagomarsino, A strength criterion for the flexural behaviour of spandrels in un-reinforced masonry walls. in Proc. 14th World Conf. Earthq. Eng. (2008) [Google Scholar]
  30. G. de Felice, S. De Santis, L. Garmendia, B. Ghiassi, P. Larrinaga, P. B. Lourenço, D. V. Oliveira, F. Paolacci, and C. G. Papanicolaou, Mortar-based systems for externally bonded strengthening of masonry. Mater. Struct. 47, 2021 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-014-0360-1 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. A. Bilotta, F. Ceroni, E. Nigro, and M. Pecce, Experimental tests on FRCM strengthening systems for tuff masonry elements. Constr. Build. Mater. 138, 114 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.01.124 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. ACI 549-L Committee and RILEM TC 250-CSM, Guide to Design and Construction of Externally Bonded Fabric-Reinforced Cementitious Matrix (FRCM) and Steel-Reinforced Grout (SRG) Guide to Design and Construction of Externally Bonded Fabric-Reinforced Cementitious Matrix (FRCM) and Steel-Reinforced Grout (SRG) Systems for Repair and Strengthening Masonry Structures (2020) [Google Scholar]
  33. NTC18 Ministero delle Infrastrutture e dei Trasporti, Aggiornamento delle Norme tecniche per le costruzioni (in Italian); https://www.gazzettaufficiale.it/eli/gu/2018/02/20/42/so/8/sg/pdf. Aggiornamento Delle Norme Tecniche per Le Costruzioni (in Italian); Https://Www.Gazzettaufficiale.It/Eli/Gu/2018/02/20/42/so/8/Sg/Pdf (2018) [Google Scholar]
  34. V. Turnšek and F. Čačovič, Some experimental results on the strength of brick masonry walls. in Proc. 2nd Int. Brick Mason. Conf. (British Ceramic Research Association Stoke-on-Trent, UK, 1971), pp. 149–156 [Google Scholar]
  35. National Research Council, CNR-DT 212/2013. Instructions for the Reliability Assessment of Seismic Safety of Existing Buildings, National Research Council, Rome (in italian). CNR-DT 212/2013. Instructions for the Reliability Assessment of Seismic Safety of Existing Buildings, National Research Council, Rome (in Italian). (2013) [Google Scholar]
  36. G. Grünthal, European Macroseismic Scale 1998. Eur. Cent. Geodyn. … 15, 100 (1998) [Google Scholar]
  37. S. Babaeidarabad, D. Arboleda, G. Loreto, and A. Nanni, Shear strengthening of un-reinforced concrete masonry walls with fabric-reinforced-cementitious-matrix. Constr. Build. Mater. 65, 243 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.04.116 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  38. S. Babaeidarabad and A. Nanni, URM walls strengthened with fabric-reinforced cementitious matrix (FRCM) subjected to in-plane and out-of-plane load. Proc. 7th Int. Conf. FRP Compos. Civ. Eng. CICE 2014 18, 4013045 (2014) [Google Scholar]
  39. G. P. Lignola, A. Prota, and G. Manfredi, Numerical simulations of in-plane behavior of tuff masonry strengthened with cementitious matrix-grid composites. Proc. 1st Asia-Pacific Conf. FRP Struct. APFIS 2007 1, 255 (2007) [Google Scholar]
  40. F. Parisi, I. Iovinella, A. Balsamo, N. Augenti, and A. Prota, In-plane behaviour of tuff masonry strengthened with inorganic matrix-grid composites in diagonal compression. ECCM 2012 - Compos. Venice, Proc. 15th Eur. Conf. Compos. Mater. 45, 1657 (2012) [Google Scholar]
  41. G. Marcari, M. Basili, and F. Vestroni, Experimental investigation of tuff masonry panels reinforced with surface bonded basalt textile-reinforced mortar. Compos. Part B Eng. 108, 131 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.09.094 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.