EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 401 (2024) MATEC Web Conf., 401 (2024) 05002 References
Open Access
Issue
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 401, 2024
21st International Conference on Manufacturing Research (ICMR2024)
Article Number 05002
Number of page(s) 6
Section Life-Cycle Analysis and Sustainable Manufacturing
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/202440105002
Published online 27 August 2024
  1. J. Wang and K. Dong, “What drives environmental degradation? Evidence from 14 Sub-Saharan African countries,” Sci. Total Environ., vol. 656, pp. 165–173, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.11.354. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. L. Al-Ghussain, “Global warming: review on driving forces and mitigation,” Environ. Prog. \& Sustain. Energy, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 13–21, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/ep.13041. [Google Scholar]
  3. M. K. Anser, “Impact of energy consumption and human activities on carbon emissions in Pakistan: application of STIRPAT model,” Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., vol. 26, no. 13, pp. 13453–13463, 2019, doi: 10.1007/s11356-019-04859-y. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. J. Fang, J. Zhu, S. Wang, C. Yue, and H. Shen, “Global warming, human-induced carbon emissions, and their uncertainties,” Sci. China Earth Sci., vol. 54, no. 10, pp. 1458–1468, 2011, doi: 10.1007/s11430-011-4292-0. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. L. Cozzi et al., “World Energy Outlook 2020,” vol. 2050, no. October, pp. 213–250, 2020, [Online]. Available: https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/energy/world-energy-outlook-2020_557a761b-en [Google Scholar]
  6. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Climate Change 2021 – The Physical Science Basis. 2023. doi: 10.1017/9781009157896. [Google Scholar]
  7. T. Wiedmann and J. Minx, “A Definition of ‘ Carbon Footprint,” Science (80-. )., vol. 1, no. 01, pp. 1–11, 2007, [Online]. Available: http://www.censa.org.uk/docs/ISA-UK_Report_07-01_carbon_footprint.pdf [Google Scholar]
  8. N. Burnett, T. Edwards, and N. Watson, “The UK’s plans and progress to reach net zero by 2050,” House Commons Libr., no. November, p. 1, 2023, [Online]. Available: https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-briefings/cbp-9888/#:~:text=Download full report-,The UK is committed to reaching net zero by 2050,warming and resultant climate change. [Google Scholar]
  9. J. Poelma and J. Rolland, “Rethinking digital manufacturing with polymers,” Science (80-. )., vol. 358, no. 6369, pp. 1384–1385, 2017, doi: 10.1126/science.aaq1351. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. E. MacDonald and R. Wicker, “Multiprocess 3D printing for increasing component functionality,” Science (80-. )., vol. 353, no. 6307, p. aaf2093, 2016, doi: 10.1126/science.aaf2093. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. D. Barba, E. Alabort, and R. C. Reed, “Synthetic bone: Design by additive manufacturing,” Acta Biomater., vol. 97, pp. 637–656, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2019.07.049. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. E. A. A. Alkebsi, H. Ameddah, T. Outtas, and A. Almutawakel, “Design of graded lattice structures in turbine blades using topology optimization,” Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf., vol. 34, pp. 370–384, 2021, [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:233029360 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. P. Pradel, R. Bibb, Z. Zhu, and J. Moultrie, “Exploring the Impact of Shape Complexity on Build Time for Material Extrusion and Material Jetting,” in Industrializing Additive Manufacturing - Proceedings of Additive Manufacturing in Products and Applications - AMPA2017, M. Meboldt and C. Klahn, Eds., Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2018, pp. 24–33. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. L. A. Dobrzański, A. D. Dobrzańska-Danikiewicz, and T. G. Gaweł, “Computer-aided design and selective laser melting of porous biomimetic materials,” Adv. Mater. Process. Technol., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 70–82, 2017, doi: 10.1080/2374068X.2016.1247339. [Google Scholar]
  15. D. I. Stoia, L. Marsavina, and E. Linul, “Mode I Fracture Toughness of Polyamide and Alumide Samples obtained by Selective Laser Sintering Additive Process,” Polymers (Basel)., vol. 12, no. 3, 2020, doi: 10.3390/polym12030640. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. J. P. Groen and O. Sigmund, “Homogenization‐based topology optimization for high‐resolution manufacturable microstructures,” Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng., vol. 113, pp. 1148–1163, 2018, [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:53069749 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. E. Alabort, D. Barba, and R. C. Reed, “Design of metallic bone by additive manufacturing,” Scr. Mater., 2019, [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:139287749 [Google Scholar]
  18. C. Li, I. Y. Kim, and J. Jeswiet, “Conceptual and detailed design of an automotive engine cradle by using topology, shape, and size optimization,” Struct. Multidiscip. Optim., vol. 51, no. 2, pp. 547–564, 2015, doi: 10.1007/s00158-014-1151-6. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. S. Oh, Y. Jung, S. Kim, I. Lee, and N. Kang, “Deep Generative Design: Integration of Topology Optimization and Generative Models,” J. Mech. Des., 2019, [Online]. Available: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:159040324 [Google Scholar]
  20. Z. Ahmadi-Gh and A. Bello-Pintado, “Why is manufacturing not more sustainable? The effects of different sustainability practices on sustainability outcomes and competitive advantage,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 337, p. 130392, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130392. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. A. H. Gutierrez-Osorio, L. Ruiz-Huerta, A. Caballero-Ruiz, H. R. Siller, and V. Borja, “Energy consumption analysis for additive manufacturing processes,” Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol., vol. 105, no. 1, pp. 1735–1743, 2019, doi: 10.1007/s00170-019-04409-3. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. C. Liu et al., “Does green environmental innovation really matter for carbon-free economy? Nexus among green technological innovation, green international trade, and green power generation,” Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., vol. 29, no. 45, pp. 67504–67512, 2022, doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-22040-w. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. T. Peng and F. Yan, “Dual-objective Analysis for Desktop FDM Printers: Energy Consumption and Surface Roughness,” Procedia CIRP, vol. 69, pp. 106–111, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.procir.2017.11.084. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. M. Petousis, N. Vidakis, N. Mountakis, E. Karapidakis, and A. Moutsopoulou, “Functionality Versus Sustainability for PLA in MEX 3D Printing: The Impact of Generic Process Control Factors on Flexural Response and Energy Efficiency,” Polymers (Basel)., vol. 15, no. 5, 2023, doi: 10.3390/polym15051232. [Google Scholar]
  25. S. S. Warke and V. S. Puranik, “Optimizing Energy Consumption, Surface Quality, and Production Time in Fused Deposition Modeling Based 3D Printing of Polylactic Acid Polymers,” J. Mater. Eng. Perform., 2023, doi: 10.1007/s11665-023-08255-z. [Google Scholar]
  26. Simon Evans, “Analysis: UK electricity from fossil fuels drops to lowest level since 1957.” [Online]. Available: https://www.carbonbrief.org/analysis-uk-electricity-from-fossil-fuels-drops-to-lowest-level-since-1957/ [Google Scholar]
  27. A. Abdelshafy, A. Hermann, S. Herres-Pawlis, and G. Walther, “Investigating the opportunities of establishing a regional bio‐based polylactic acid supply chain: A case study from North Rhine‐Westphalia,” Chemie Ing. Tech., vol. 94, no. 9, pp. 1307–1307, 2022, doi: 10.1002/cite.202255120. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. D. S. c Nectarios Vidakis a, Markos Petousis a, Emmanuel Karapidakis b, Nikolaos Mountakis a, Constantine David c, “Energy consumption versus strength in MEΧ 3D printing of polylactic acid,” Adv. Ind. Manuf. Eng., vol. 6, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  29. N. Vidakis, M. Petousis, E. Karapidakis, N. Mountakis, C. David, and D. Sagris, “Energy consumption versus strength in MEΧ 3D printing of polylactic acid,” Adv. Ind. Manuf. Eng., vol. 6, no. December 2022, p. 100119, 2023, doi: 10.1016/j.aime.2023.100119. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.