Open Access
| Issue |
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 398, 2024
2nd International Conference on Modern Technologies in Mechanical & Materials Engineering (MTME-2024)
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 01030 | |
| Number of page(s) | 15 | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/202439801030 | |
| Published online | 25 June 2024 | |
- M. Q. Zafar and H. Zhao, “4D Printing: Future Insight in Additive Manufacturing,” Metals and Materials International, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 564–585, 2020, doi: 10.1007/s12540-019-00441-w. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- ISO/TC 261 and ASTMKomitee F42, “ISO/ASTM 52900:2021,” Additive manufacturing — General principles — Fundamentals and vocabulary, vol. 2. 2021. [Google Scholar]
- M. S. Mustafa, M. A. Muneer, and M. Q. Zafar, “Process parameter optimization for Fused Filament Fabrication additive manufacturing of PLA / PHA biodegradable polymer blend,” vol. 37, no. 1, pp. 1–14, 2022. [Google Scholar]
- T. Kozior and C. Kundera, “Evaluation of the Influence of Parameters of FDM Technology on the Selected Mechanical Properties of Models,” in Procedia Engineering, 2017. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.06.080. [Google Scholar]
- T. Nancharaiah, “Optimization of Process Parameters in FDM Process Using Design of Experiments,” International Journal on Emerging Technologies 2(1):, vol. 2, no. 1, 2011. [Google Scholar]
- I. J. Solomon, P. Sevvel, and J. Gunasekaran, “A review on the various processing parameters in FDM,” in Materials Today: Proceedings, 2020. doi: 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.05.484. [Google Scholar]
- E. Vahabli and S. Rahmati, “Improvement of FDM parts’ surface quality using optimized neural networks Medical case studies,” Rapid Prototyping Journal, vol. 23, no. 4, 2017, doi: 10.1108/RPJ-06-2015-0075. [Google Scholar]
- M. Hassan, A. K. Mohanty, and M. Misra, “3D printing in upcycling plastic and biomass waste to sustainable polymer blends and composites: A review,” Materials & Design, vol. 237, p. 112558, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.1016/J.MATDES.2023.112558. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- V. Andronov, L. Beránek, V. Krůta, L. Hlavůňková, and Z. Jeníková, “Overview and Comparison of PLA Filaments Commercially Available in Europe for FFF Technology,” Polymers, vol. 15, no. 14, 2023, doi: 10.3390/polym15143065. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- J. M. Chacón, M. A. Caminero, E. García-Plaza, and P. J. Núñez, “Additive manufacturing of PLA structures using fused deposition modelling: Effect of process parameters on mechanical properties and their optimal selection,” Materials and Design, vol. 124, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2017.03.065. [Google Scholar]
- C. M. González-Henríquez, M. A. Sarabia-Vallejos, and J. Rodriguez-Hernandez, “Polymers for additive manufacturing and 4D-printing: Materials, methodologies, and biomedical applications,” Progress in Polymer Science. 2019. doi: 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2019.03.001. [Google Scholar]
- ASTM, “ASTM E2248 − 18 Standard Test Method for Impact Testing of Miniaturized Charpy V-notch Specimens,” ASTM, 2021. [Google Scholar]
- ASTM, “D785-03-Standard Test Method for Rockwell Hardness of Plastics and Electrical Insulating,” Annual Book of ASTM Standards, vol. 14, 2008. [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.