Ethical guidelines for using bioprinting for humans

Open Access

Issue		MATEC Web Conf. Volume 388, 2023 2023 RAPDASA-RobMech-PRASA-AMI Conference Advanced Manufacturing Beyond Borders - The 24^th Annual International RAPDASA Conference joined by RobMech, PRASA and AMI, hosted by CSIR and CUT


Article Number		10005
Number of page(s)		12
Section		AM Post Processing & Qualification
DOI		https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/202338810005
Published online		15 December 2023

J. H. Van den Berg, Medische macht en medische ethiek. Nijkerk: Uitgeverij G.F. Callenbach. (1969). [Google Scholar]
Republic of South Africa (RSA), Report of the Presidential Commission on the Fourth Industrial Revolution. The Presidency: Republic of South Africa (2020). [Google Scholar]
J. Creplet, De derde revolutie in de geneeskunde. Brussel: Pharma.be. (2013). [Google Scholar]
World Economic Forum, Health and Healthcare in the Fourth Industrial Revolution. Global Future Council on the Future of Health and Healthcare 2016-2018. Geneve. (2019). https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF__Shaping_the_Future_of_Health_Council_Report.pdf Downloaded from the internet on 26 January 2023. [Google Scholar]
SANDVIK, What is AM? https://www.additive.sandvik/en/about-us/what-is-additive-manufacturing/ (2022). Downloaded from the internet on 12 December 2022. [Google Scholar]
S. Miller, The Billion Cell Construct: Will Three-Dimensional Printing Get Us There? PLoS Biol 12(6): e1001882. (2014). doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001882. Downloaded from the internet on 22 September 2023. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
S. Fanucci, M. W. Barwick, E. Prinsloo, Bioprinting: Prospects, considerations and challenges for application in South African clinical environments. South African Medical Journal 2019;109(8b):34–39. DOI:10.7196/SAMJ.2019.v109i8b.13838. Downloaded from the internet on 22 September 2023. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
A.J. Kanter, K.R. Jongsma, M.C. Verhaar, A.L. Bredenoord, The Ethical Implications of Tissue Engineering for Regenerative Purposes: A Systematic Review. Tissue Eng Part B Rev. 2023 Apr;29(2):167–187. (2023). doi: 10.1089/ten.TEB.2022.0033. Downloaded from the internet on 22 September 2023. [Google Scholar]
ISO/ASTM 52900: 2015, Additive manufacturing: General principles and Terminology. (2015). https://www.iso.org/obp/ui/#iso:std:iso-astm:52900:dis:ed-2:v1:en. Downloaded from the internet on 24 June 2023. [Google Scholar]
Wohlers Report 2022, (2022). https://wohlersassociates.com/terminology-and-definitions/additive-manufacturing. Downloaded from the internet on 14 April 2022. [Google Scholar]
S. Vijayavenkataraman, A perspective on bioprinting ethics. Artificial Organs. 40 (11); 1033 - 1038. (2016). https://doi.org/10.1111/aor.12873 Downloaded from the internet on 13 December 2022. [Google Scholar]
R.C. Rabin, "Doctors Transplant Ear of Human Cells, Made by 3-D Printer". The New York Times. (2 June 2022). https://www.nytimes.com/2022/06/02/health/ear-transplant-3d-. Downloaded from the internet on 13 December 2022. [Google Scholar]
3D Printing Industry. 3DBio Conducts successful human ear reconstruction with 3D bioprinted Aurinovo Implant. (6 June 2022). https://3dprintingindustry.com/news/3dbio-conducts-successful-human-ear-reconstruction-with-3d-bioprinted-aurinovo-implant-210201/. Downloaded from the internet on 22 September 2023. [Google Scholar]
F. Gilbert, C.D. O'Connell, T. Mladenovska, S. Dodds, Print Me an Organ? Ethical and Regulatory Issues Emerging from 3D Bioprinting in Medicine. Sci Eng Ethics. Feb; 24(1):73–91. (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-017-9874-6. Downloaded from the internet on 13 December 2022. [Google Scholar]
N. Vermeulen, G. Haddow, T. Seymour, A. Faulkner-Jones, W. Shu, 3D bioprint me: a socioethical view of bioprinting human organs and tissues. Journal of Medical Ethics, 43:618–624. (2017). 10.1136/medethics-2015-103347. Downloaded from the internet on 14 December 2022. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
G. Ogoh, The ethical issues of Additive Manufacturing. Unpublished PhD study: De Montfort University. (2020). https://dora.dmu.ac.uk/bitstream/handle/2086/20571/PhD_Thesis_George_Ogoh_October_2020_Final.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y. Downloaded from the internet 29 November 2022. [Google Scholar]
O. Hooper, Five ethical concerns with 3D Printing in Medicine. Law Technology Today. (26 May 2020). https://www/lawtechnologytoday.org/2022/05/five-etical-concerns-with-3d-printing-in-medicine. Downloaded from the internet on 12 December 2022. [Google Scholar]
S. Simana, Reflections on Bioprinting Law: How should 3D-Bioprinted organs be classified and what does it mean to treat them as property. Science. Law and Biosciences Blog. (12 September 2022). https://law.stanford.edu/2022/09/12/reflections-on-bioprinting-law-how-should-3d-bioprinted-organs-be-classified-and-what-does-it-mean-to-treat-them-as-property/. Downloaded from the internet on 12 December 2022. [Google Scholar]
S. Dodds, 3D printing raises ethical issues in medicine. ABC Science (15 February 2015). https://www.abc.net.au/science/articles/2015/02/11/4161675.htm. Downloaded from the internet on 09 July 2023. [Google Scholar]
A. Kirillova, S. Bushev, A. Abubakirov, G. Sukikh, Bioethical and Legal Issues in 3D Bioprinting. Int J Bioprint. Apr 28;6(3):272. (2020). doi: 10.18063/ijb.v6i3.272. Downloaded from the internet on 13 December 2022. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
T. Walsh, Machines behaving badly: The morality of AI. La Trobe University Press. (2020). [Google Scholar]
T.L. Beauchamp, J.F. Childress, Principles of biomedical ethics. 7^th edition. New York: Oxford University Press. (2013). [Google Scholar]
B. Varkey, Principles of Clinical Ethics and Their Application to Practice. Med Princ Pract. 30(1):17–28. (2021). doi: 10.1159/000509119. Downloaded from the internet on 8 July 2023. [Google Scholar]
B. Taylor, Leadership Just because you can doesn’t mean you should. Harvard Business Review. (6 December 2011.) https://hbr.org/2011/12/just-because-you-can-doesnt-me. Downloaded from the internet on 8 July 2023. [Google Scholar]
A. Zimmerling, X. Chen, Bioprinting for combating infectious diseases. Bioprinting. Dec;20:e00104. (2020). doi: 10.1016/j.bprint.2020.e00104. Downloaded from the internet on 8 July 2023. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
M. Kesti, P. Fisch, M. Pensalfini, E. Mazza, M. Zenobi, Guidelines for standardization of bioprinting: A systematic study of process parameters and their effect on bioprinted structures. BioNanoMaterials. (2016). 17. 10.1515/bnm-2016-0004. Downloaded from the internet on 8 July 2023. [Google Scholar]
International Organization for Standardization (ISO). ISO 1348: 2016, Medical devices - Quality management systems: Requirements for regulatory purposes. (2016). https://www.iso.org/files/live/sites/isoorg/files/store/en/PUB100377.pdf Downloaded from the internet on 22 September 2022. [Google Scholar]
International Organization for Standardization (ISO). ISO 10993-1:2018, Biological evaluation of medical devices - Part 1: Evaluation and testing within a risk management process. (2018). https://www.iso.org/obp/ui#iso:std:iso:10993:-1:ed-5:v2:en [Google Scholar]
Republic of South Africa, South African Occupational and Safety Act 85 of 1993 (1993). https://www.gov.za/sites/default/files/gcis_document/201409/act85of1993.pdf. Downloaded from the internet on 8 July 2023. [Google Scholar]
T. Sprinkle, The 5 most important standards in additive manufacturing. Standardization News: ASTM International. (no date) https://sn.astm.org/features/5-most-important-standards-additive-manufacturing-.html. Downloaded from the internet on 8 July 2023. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.