EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 377 (2023) MATEC Web Conf., 377 (2023) 01015 References
Open Access
Issue
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 377, 2023
Curtin Global Campus Higher Degree by Research Colloquium (CGCHDRC 2022)
Article Number 01015
Number of page(s) 9
Section Engineering and Technologies for Sustainable Development
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/202337701015
Published online 17 April 2023
  1. X. Zhou, Q. W. Yuan, X. L. Peng, F. H. Zeng, and L. H. Zhang, “A critical review of the CO2 huff ‘n’ puff process for enhanced heavy oil recovery,” (in English), Fuel, Review vol. 215, pp. 813–824, Mar 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2017.11.092. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. B. E. Outlook, “2019 edition.” [Google Scholar]
  3. D. W. Green and G. P. Willhite, Enhanced Oil Recovery, Revised Edition ed. (no. SPE Textbook Series). United States of America: Society of Petroleum Engineers, 1998, p. 545. [Google Scholar]
  4. A. O. Gbadamosi, R. Junin, M. A. Manan, N. Yekeen, A. Agi, and J. O. Oseh, “Recent advances and prospects in polymeric nanofluids application for enhanced oil recovery,” Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, vol. 66, pp. 1–19, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.jiec.2018.05.020. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. L. Zhang et al., “Natural Halloysites-Based Janus Platelet Surfactants for the Formation of Pickering Emulsion and Enhanced Oil Recovery,” Scientific reports, vol. 9, no. 1, p. 163, 2019. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. T. Ahmed, “Chapter 11 - Oil Recovery Mechanisms and the Material Balance Equation,” in Reservoir Engineering Handbook (Fourth Edition), T. Ahmed Ed. Boston: Gulf Professional Publishing, 2010, pp. 733–809. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Z. Song, Y. Song, Y. Li, B. Bai, K. Song, and J. Hou, “A critical review of CO2 enhanced oil recovery in tight oil reservoirs of North America and China,” Fuel, vol. 276, p. 118006, 2020/09/15/ 2020, doi: https://doi.Org/10.1016/j.fuel.2020.118006. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. A. Satter and G. M. Iqbal, “17 - Enhanced oil recovery processes: thermal, chemical, and miscible floods,” in Reservoir Engineering, A. Satter and G.M. Iqbal Eds. Boston: Gulf Professional Publishing, 2016, pp. 313–337. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. B. Jia, J.-S. Tsau, and R. Barati, “A review of the current progress of CO2 injection EOR and carbon storage in shale oil reservoirs,” Fuel, vol. 236, pp. 404–427, 2019/01/15/ 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016Zj.fuei.2018.08.103. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. L. Wang et al., “Advances in improved/enhanced oil recovery technologies for tight and shale reservoirs,” Fuel, vol. 210, pp. 425–445, 2017, doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2017.08.095. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. O. Muraza and A. Galadima, “Aquathermolysis of heavy oil: A review and perspective on catalyst development,” Fuel, vol. 157, pp. 219–231, 2015/10/01/ 2015, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuei.2015.04.065. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. S. Tajik, A. Shahrabadi, A. Rashidi, M. Jalilian, and A. Yadegari, “Application of functionaiized siiica-graphene nanohybrid for the enhanced oii recovery performance,” Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, voi. 556, pp. 253–265, 2018/11/05/ 2018, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coisurfa.2018.08.029. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. L. Sun et al., “Recent advances of surfactant-stabiiized N2/CO2 foams in enhanced oii recovery,” Fuel, voi. 241, pp. 83–93, 2019/04/01/ 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fUei.2018.12.016. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. J. J. Sheng, “Criticai review of iow-saiinity waterfiooding,” Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, voi. 120, pp. 216–224, 2014/08/01/ 2014, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petroi.2014.05.026. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. B. Yuan, R. G. Moghanioo, and W. D. Wang, “Using nanofiuids to controi fines migration for oii recovery: Nanofiuids co-injection or nanofiuids pre-fiush? -A comprehensive answer,” (in Engiish), Fuel, Articie voi. 215, pp. 474–483, Mar 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.fuei.2017.11.088. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. N. Yekeen, E. Padmanabhan, and A. K. Idris, “A review of recent advances in foam-based fracturing fiuid appiication in unconventionai reservoirs,” Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, voi. 66, pp. 45–71, 2018/10/25/ 2018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2018.05.039. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. H. Yu, Y.-M. Wei, B.-J. Tang, Z. Mi, and S.-Y. Pan, “Assessment on the research trend of iow-carbon energy technoiogy investment: A bibiiometric anaiysis,” Applied Energy, voi. 184, pp. 960–970, 2016/12/15/ 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.07.129. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. M. C. P. Gonçalves, T. G. Kieckbusch, R. F. Perna, J. T. Fujimoto, S. A. V. Morales, and J. P. Romanelli, “Trends on enzyme immobilization researches based on bibliometric analysis,” Process Biochemistry, 2018/10/04/ 2018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procbio.2018.09.016. [Google Scholar]
  19. J. A. Garrido-Cardenas, F. Manzano-Agugliaro, F.G. Acien-Fernandez, and E. Molina-Grima, “Microalgae research worldwide,” Algal Research, vol. 35, pp. 50–60, 2018, 10.1016/j.algal.2018.08.005. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. “Brent Crude Oil Prices - 10 Year Daily Chart.” macrotrends. https://www.macrotrends.net/2480/brent-crude-oil-prices-10-year-daily-chart (accessed 14 November, 2018). [Google Scholar]
  21. K. van Nunen, J. Li, G. Reniers, and K. Ponnet, “Bibliometric analysis of safety culture research,” Safety Science, vol. 108, pp. 248–258, 2018/10/01/ 2018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2017.08.011. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Vox. “Report: we have just 12 years to limit devastating global warming.’ https://www.vox.com/2018/10/8/17948832/climate-change-global-warming-un-ipcc-report (accessed 8/10/18, 2018). [Google Scholar]
  23. F. M. OrrJr., “Carbon Capture, Utilization, and Storage: An Update,” SPE Journal, vol. 23, no. 06, pp. 2444–2455, 2018/12/1/ 2018, 10.2118/194190-PA. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. P. Bakhshi, R. Kharrat, A. Hashemi, and M. Zallaghi, “Experimental evaluation of carbonated waterflooding: A practical process for enhanced oil recovery and geological CO2 storage,” Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 238–256, 2018, 10.1002/ghg.1734. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. Y. Zhou et al., “CO2 injection in coal: Advantages and influences of temperature and pressure,” Fuel, vol. 236, pp. 493–500, 2019/01/15/ 2019, https://doi.org/10.1016Zj.fuel.2018.09.016. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. D. Y. C. Leung, G. Caramanna, and M. M. Maroto-Valer, “An overview of current status of carbon dioxide capture and storage technologies,” (in English), Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, Review vol. 39, pp. 426–443, Nov 2014, 10.1016/j.rser.2014.07.093. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. W. Li, Z. Liu, E. Su, and Y. Cheng, “Experimental investigation on the effects of supercritical carbon dioxide on coal permeability : Implication for CO2 injection method,” Energy & Fuels, 2018/12/21 2018, 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.8b03729. [Google Scholar]
  28. L. Jin et al., “Advancing CO2 enhanced oil recovery and storage in unconventional oil play— Experimental studies on Bakken shales,” Applied Energy, vol. 208, pp. 171–183, 2017/12/15/ 2017, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.10.054. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. R. Phukan, S. B. Gogoi, and P. Tiwari, “Alkaline-surfactant-alternated-gas/CO2 flooding: Effects of key parameters,” Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, vol. 173, pp. 547–557, 2019/02/01/ 2019, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2018.10.043. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. N. Ahmad, A. Wörman, X. Sanchez-Vila, J. Jarsjö, A. Bottacin-Busolin, and H. Hellevang, “Injection of CO2-saturated brine in geological reservoir: A way to enhanced storage safety,” International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, vol. 54, pp. 129–144, 2016/11/01/ 2016, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2016.08.028. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. C. Esene, N. Rezaei, A. Aborig, and S. Zendehboudi, “Comprehensive review of carbonated water injection for enhanced oil recovery,” Fuel, vol. 237, pp. 1086–1107, 2019/02/01/ 2019, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2018.08.106. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. H. Tian, H. Quan, Z. Huang, and S. Jiang, “pH-switchable and CO2-switchable viscoelastic fluids based on a pseudo-hydrophobically associating water-soluble polymer,” Fuel, vol. 227, pp. 42–47, 2018/09/01/ 2018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2018.04.087. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. Y. Zhang et al., “Smart mobility control agent for enhanced oil recovery during CO2 flooding in ultra-low permeability reservoirs,” Fuel, vol. 241, pp. 442–450, 2019/04/01/ 2019, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2018.12.069. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. L. Hao et al., “pH-Responsive Emulsions with Supramolecularly Assembled Shells,” Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research, vol. 57, no. 28, pp. 9231–9239, 2018/07/18 2018, 10.1021/acs.iecr.8b00984. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  35. C. Xiong, K. Peng, X. Tang, Z. Ye, Y. Shi, and H. Yang, “CO2-responsive self-healable hydrogels based on hydrophobically-modified polymers bridged by wormlike micelles,” RSC Advances, vol. 7, no. 55, pp. 34669–34675, 2017, 10.1039/c7ra06418g. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  36. J. Rutqvist, “The Geomechanics of CO2 Storage in Deep Sedimentary Formations,” Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 525–551, 2012/06/01 2012, 10.1007/s10706-011-9491-0. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  37. M. Torsæter and P. Cerasi, “Geological and geomechanical factors impacting loss of near-well permeability during CO2 injection,” International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, vol. 76, pp. 193–199, 2018/09/01/ 2018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijggc.2018.07.006. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  38. W. Ampomah et al., “Optimum design of CO2 storage and oil recovery under geological uncertainty,” Applied Energy, vol. 195, pp. 80–92, 2017/06/01/ 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.03.017. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  39. X. Wang, K. van Veld, P. Marcy, S. Huzurbazar, and V. Alvarado, “Economic cooptimization of oil recovery and CO2 sequestration,” Applied Energy, vol. 222, pp. 132–147, 2018/07/15/ 2018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.03.166. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  40. M. Safdel, Mohammad A. Anbaz, A. Daryasafar, and M. Jamialahmadi, “Microbial enhanced oil recovery, a critical review on worldwide implemented field trials in different countries,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 74, pp. 159–172, 2017/07/01/ 2017, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.02.045. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  41. C. Gao, “Experiences of microbial enhanced oil recovery in Chinese oil fields,” Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, vol. 166, pp. 55–62, 2018/07/01/ 2018, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2018.03.037. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  42. C.-Y. Ke, W.-J. Sun, Y.-B. Li, G.-M. Lu, Q.-Z. Zhang, and X.-L. Zhang, “Microbial enhanced oil recovery in Baolige Oilfield using an indigenous facultative anaerobic strain Luteimonas huabeiensis sp. nov,” Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, vol. 167, pp. 160–167, 2018/08/01/ 2018, https://doi.org/10.1016Zj.petrol.2018.04.015. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  43. C.-Y. Ke, G.-M. Lu, Y.-B. Li, W.-J. Sun, Q.-Z. Zhang, and X.-L. Zhang, “A pilot study on large-scale microbial enhanced oil recovery (MEOR) in Baolige Oilfield,” International Biodeterioration & Biodegradation, vol. 127, pp. 247–253, 2018/02/01/ 2018, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibiod.2017.12.009. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  44. Y. Kryachko, “Novel approaches to microbial enhancement of oil recovery,” Journal of Biotechnology, vol. 266, pp. 118–123, 2018/01/20/ 2018, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2017.12.019. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  45. A. M. Abdel-Mawgoud, F. Lépine, and E. Déziel, “Rhamnolipids: diversity of structures, microbial origins and roles,” Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, vol. 86, no. 5, pp. 1323–1336, 2010/05/01 2010, 10.1007/s00253-010-2498-2. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.