Open Access
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 372, 2022
International Conference on Science and Technology 2022 “Advancing Science and Technology Innovation on Post Pandemic Through Society 5.0” (ICST-2022)
Article Number 02008
Number of page(s) 6
Section Advance Material and Interface
Published online 08 December 2022
  1. R. A. Pratama, S. Toaha, and Kasbawati, “Optimal harvesting and stability of predator prey model with Monod-Haldane predation response function and stage structure for predator,” IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci., vol. 279, no. 1, (2019), doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/279/1/012015 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. R. A. Pratama, M. Fransina, V. Ruslau, and U. Musamus, “Application of Beddington DeAngelis Response Function in Ecological Mathematical System: Study Fish Endemic Oliv Predator Species in Merauke,” JTAM (Jurnal Teor. and Apl. Mat., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 51–60, (2022) [Google Scholar]
  3. H. Deng, F. Chen, Z. Zhu, and Z. Li, “Dynamic behaviors of Lotka–Volterra predator–prey model incorporating predator cannibalism,” Adv. Differ. Equations, vol. 2019, no. 1, (2019), doi: 10.1186/s13662-019-2289-8 [Google Scholar]
  4. F. F. Ribeiro and M. C. Portella, “Dynamics and morphological limitation of intracohort cannibalism during the early life stages of captive barred sorubim Pseudoplatystoma reticulatum,” Aquaculture, vol. 542, no. December 2020, p. 736838, (2021), doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2021.736838 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. Y. D. Jeong, S. Kim, I. H. Jung, and G. Cho, “Optimal harvesting strategy for hairtail, Trichiurus Lepturus, in Korea Sea using discretetime age-structured model,” Appl. Math. Comput., vol. 392, p. 125743, (2021), doi: 10.1016/j.amc.2020.125743 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. V. K. Pham, H. P. Truong, D. K. Nguyen, and N. H. Nguyen, “Genetic component of cannibalism in Asian seabass Lates Calcarifer,” Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., vol. 231, no. May 2019, p. 105074, (2020), doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2020.105074 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. K. Takatsu, “Predator cannibalism can shift prey community composition toward dominance by small prey species,” Ecol. Evol., vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 1–11, (2022), doi: 10.1002/ece3.8894 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. J. Li, X. Zhu, X. Lin, and J. Li, “Impact of cannibalism on dynamics of a structured predator–prey system,” Appl. Math. Model., vol. 78, pp. 1–19, (2020), doi: 10.1016/j.apm.2019.09.022 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. M. Chen, S. Fu, and X. Yang, “Global Behavior of Solutions in a Predator-Prey Cross-Diffusion Model with Cannibalism,” Complexity, vol. 2020, (2020), doi: 10.1155/2020/1265798 [Google Scholar]
  10. M. L. Andersson, K. Hulthén, C. Blake, C. Brönmark, and P. A. Nilsson, “Linking behavioural type with cannibalism in Eurasian perch,” PLoS One, vol. 16, no. 12 December, (2021), doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0260938 [Google Scholar]
  11. C. M. Oliveira, C. S. A. Silva-Torres, J. B. Torres, and N. De La Pava, “Cannibalism and intraguild predation between endemic and introduced coccidophagous lady beetles (Coleoptera: Coccinellidae),” Austral Entomol., vol. 61, no. 2, pp. 225–235, (2022), doi: 10.1111/aen.12589 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. B. Heltonika, A. O. Sudrajat, and M. Z. Jr, “Cannibalistic behavior and way of predation among the fry of Asian redtail catfish Hemibagrus nemurus at different stocking densities Cannibalistic behavior and way of predation among the fry of Asian redtail catfish Hemibagrus nemurus at different stocking densities,” no. May, (2022). [Google Scholar]
  13. C. Arancibia–Ibarra and J. Flores, “Dynamics of a Leslie–Gower predator–prey model with Holling type II functional response, Allee effect and a generalist predator,” Math. Comput. Simul., vol. 188, pp. 1–22, (2021), doi: 10.1016/j.matcom.2021.03.035 [Google Scholar]
  14. P. Mishra, S. N. Raw, and B. Tiwari, “On a cannibalistic predator–prey model with prey defense and diffusio,” Appl. Math. Model., vol. 90, pp. 165–190, (2021), doi: 10.1016/j.apm.2020.08.060 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. A. L. Mbuji et al., “A study on the cannibalism behaviour and predation of the larvae of fall armyworm (Spodoptera frugiperda),” Entomol. Res., vol. 52, no. 5, pp. 251–258, (2022), doi: 10.1111/1748-5967.12584 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. F. Cunha-Saraiva, S. Balshine, R. H. Wagner, and F. C. Schaedelin, “From cannibal to caregiver: tracking the transition in a cichlid fish,” Anim. Behav., vol. 139, pp. 9–17, (2018), doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2018.03.003 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. S. Li, C. Wang, and K. Wu, “Relaxation oscillations of a slow–fast predator–prey model with a piecewise smooth functional response,” Appl. Math. Lett., vol. 113, p. 106852, (2021), doi: 10.1016/j.aml.2020.106852 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. M. Rayungsari, A. Suryanto, W. M. Kusumawinahyu, and I. Darti, “Dynamical Analysis of a Predator-Prey Model Incorporating Predator Cannibalism and Refuge,” Axioms, vol. 11, no. 3, (2022), doi: 10.3390/axioms11030116 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. T. Colchen, E. Gisbert, Y. Ledoré, F. Teletchea, P. Fontaine, and A. Pasquet, “Is a cannibal different from its conspecifics? A behavioural, morphological, muscular and retinal structure study with pikeperch juveniles under farming conditions,” Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci., vol. 224, no. October 2019, (2020), doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2020.104947 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. M. L. Allen, A. Inagaki, and M. P. Ward, “Cannibalism in Raptors: A Review,” J. Raptor Res., vol. 54, no. 4, pp. 424–430, (2020), doi: 10.3356/0892-1016-54.4.424 [Google Scholar]
  21. J. L. Hayward, “An Evolutionary Game- Theoretic Model of Cannibalism,” Nat. Resour. Model., no. February 2015, pp. 497–521, (2015) [Google Scholar]
  22. C. Arancibia-Ibarra, “The basins of attraction in a modified May–Holling–Tanner predator–prey model with Allee affect,” Nonlinear Anal. Theory, Methods Appl., vol. 185, pp. 15–28, (2019), doi: 10.1016/ [Google Scholar]
  23. K. P. Wijaya et al., “Food sharing and time budgeting in predator-prey interaction,” Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul., vol. 97, p. 105757, (2021), doi: 10.1016/j.cnsns.2021.105757 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.