EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 361 (2022) MATEC Web Conf., 361 (2022) 06003 References
Open Access
Issue
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 361, 2022
Concrete Solutions 2022 – 8th International Conference on Concrete Repair, Durability & Technology
Article Number 06003
Number of page(s) 5
Section Theme 6 - Durability Performance of Concrete
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/202236106003
Published online 30 June 2022
  1. Tchadjie L.N. and Ekolu, S.O (2018), Enhancing the reactivity of aluminosilicate materials toward geopolymer synthesis, Journal of Materials Science 53, 4709–4733. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-017-1907-7. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Naghizadeh, A. and Ekolu S.O. (2019), Method for comprehensive mix design of fly ash geopolymer mortars, Construction and Building Materials 202, 704–717. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Naghizadeh, A. and Ekolu S.O. (2017), Pozzolanic materials and waste products for formulation of geopolymer cements in developing countries: a Review, Concrete Beton, Jour. Concrete Society of Southern Africa, Nov 2017, Number 151, 22-31. [Google Scholar]
  4. Ekolu S.O., Thomas M.D.A and Hooton R.D. (2006), Studies on Ugandan volcanic ash and tuff, Proc. 1st Intl. Conf. on Advances in Engineering and Technology, Entebbe, Uganda, July 75-83. [Google Scholar]
  5. Davidovits, J. (2011), Geopolymer Chemistry and Applications, 3rd Ed., Institut Géopolymère, France,. [Google Scholar]
  6. Liew Y.M., Heah C.Y., Mustafa A.B., Kamarudin, H. (2016), Structure and properties of clay-based geopolymer cements: A review, Progress in Materials Science 83 595–629. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Cyr, M. and Pouhet, R. (2015), Resistance to alkali-aggregate reaction (AAR) of alkali-activated cement-based binders, Woodhead Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1533/9781782422884.3.397. [Google Scholar]
  8. Williamson, T. and Juenger M.C.G. (2016), The role of activating solution concentration on alkali-silica reaction in alkali-activated fly ash concrete, Cement and Concrete Research 83, 124–130. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Lei, J., Fu, J. and Yang, E. (2020), Alkali-Silica Reaction Resistance and Pore Solution Composition of Low-Calcium Fly Ash-Based Geopolymer Concrete, Infrastructures 5, 2–15. [Google Scholar]
  10. Stanton T.E. (1942), Expansion of concrete through reaction between cement and aggregate, Transactions of American Society of Civil Engineers 107, 54–84. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. Saha A.K., Khan M.N.N., Sarker P.K. Shaikh F.A. and Pramanik, A. (2018), The ASR mechanism of reactive aggregates in concrete and its mitigation by fly ash: A critical review, Construction and Building Materials 171, 743–758. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Salim M.U. and Mosaberpanah M.A. (2021), The mechanism of alkali-aggregate reaction in concrete/mortar and its mitigation by using geopolymer materials and mineral admixtures : a comprehensive review, European Journal of Environmental and Civil Engineering 0, 1–41. DOI: 10.1080/19648189.2021.1960899 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Sanchez L.F.M., Fournier, B., Jolin, M., Mitchell, D., and Bastien, J. (2017), Overall assessment of Alkali-Aggregate Reaction (AAR) in concretes presenting different strengths and incorporating a wide range of reactive aggregate types and natures, Cement and Concrete Research 93, 17–31. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. Fernandez-Jimenez, A. and Puertas, F. (2002), The alkali-silica reaction in alkali-activated granulated slag mortars with reactive aggregate, Cement and Concrete. Composites 32, 1019–1024. [Google Scholar]
  15. Tänzer, R., Jin, Y. and Stephan, D.(2017), Effect of the inherent alkalis of alkali-activated slag on the risk of alkali-silica reaction, Cement and Concrete Research 98, 82–90. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. ASTM C1260 (2021), Standard Test Method for Potential Alkali Reactivity of Aggregates ( Mortar-Bar Method), American Society for Testing and Materials, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1520/C1260-21.2. [Google Scholar]
  17. ASTM C1293 (2020), Standard test method for determination of length change of concrete due to alkali-silica reaction, American Society for Testing and Materials 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1520/C1293-20A.2. [Google Scholar]
  18. Pouhet R and Cyr, M. (2015), Alkali – silica reaction in metakaolin-based geopolymer mortar, Materials and Structures, 48 571–583. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. Razak S.N. and Nuruddin M.F. (2014), The effects of alkali-silica reaction (ASR) towards fly ash-based geopolymer concrete, Applied Mechanics and Materials 699, 271–276. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. Yang, M., Paudel S.R. and Asa, E. (2020), Comparison of pore structure in alkali-activated fly ash geopolymer and ordinary concrete due to alkali-silica reaction using micro-computed tomography, Construction and Building Materials 236 1–11. [Google Scholar]
  21. Naghizadeh, A. and Ekolu S.O. (2022), Activator-related effects of sodium hydroxide storage solution in standard testing of fly ash geopolymer mortars for alkali-silica reaction, Materials and Structures 55, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1617/s11527-021-01875-8. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. Mahanama, D., de Silva, P., Kim, T., Castel, A., Khan M.S.H. (2019), Evaluating effect of GGBFS in alkali-silica reaction in geopolymer mortar with accelerated mortar bar test, Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering 31 04019167. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. AS 1141.60.1 (2014), Methods for sampling and testing aggregates Part 60.1: Alkali aggregate reactivity—Accelerated mortar bar method, Standards Australia 1–17. [Google Scholar]
  24. Naghizadeh, A. and Ekolu S.O. (2017), Investigation of mixture factors influencing alkali-silica reaction in fly ash-based geopolymer mortars, in: Int. Conf. on Advances in Construction Materials and Systems,, (ICACMS-2017), Chennai, pp. 395–400. [Google Scholar]
  25. Al-otaibi, S. (2008), Durability of concrete incorporating GGBS activated by water-glass, Construction and Building Materials 22, 2059–2067. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2007.07.023. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.