EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 343 (2021) MATEC Web Conf., 343 (2021) 11009 References
Open Access
Issue
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 343, 2021
10th International Conference on Manufacturing Science and Education – MSE 2021
Article Number 11009
Number of page(s) 11
Section Academic Education and Management
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/202134311009
Published online 04 August 2021
  1. V. Grecu and S. Nate, „Managing Sustainability with Eco-Business Intelligence Instruments’, Manag. Sustain. Dev., Vol. 6, no. 1, 2014, Accessed: Jan. 23, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://econpapers.repec.org/article/vrsmsudev/v_3a6_3ay_3a2014_3ai_3a1_3ap_3a6_3an_3a3.htm. [Google Scholar]
  2. A. J. Rotherham and D. T. Willingham, „Not New, but a Worthy Challenge’, p. 4. [Google Scholar]
  3. World Bank, „World Development Report 2016: Digital Dividends’. World Bank Publications, [Online]. Available: https://www.worldbank.org/en/publication/wdr2016. [Google Scholar]
  4. G. Mullen, „Maslow before Bloom’, Exploring the Core, Apr. 02, 2020. https://www.exploringthecore.com/post/maslow-before-bloom (accessed Mar. 17, 2021). [Google Scholar]
  5. E. L. Bjork, R. A. Bjork, and others, „Making things hard on yourself, but in a good way: Creating desirable difficulties to enhance learning’, Psychol. Real World Essays Illus. Fundam. Contrib. Soc., Vol. 2, no. 59–68, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  6. A. Honigsfeld and J. Nordmeyer, „Teacher Collaboration During a Global Pandemic Educational Leadership’. http://www.ascd.org/publications/educational-leadership/summer20/vol77/num10/Teacher-Collaboration-During-a-GlobalPandemic.aspx (accessed Mar. 12, 2021). [Google Scholar]
  7. R. C. Chick et al., „Using technology to maintain the education of residents during the Covid-19 pandemic’, J. Surg. Educ., Vol. 77, no. 4, pp. 729–732, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  8. S. Shah et al., „The technological impact of Covid-19 on the future of education and health care delivery.’, Pain Physician, pp. S367–S380, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  9. A. Aristovnik, D. Keržič, D. Ravšelj, N. Tomaževič, and L. Umek, „Impacts of the Covid-19 pandemic on life of higher education students: A global perspective’, Sustainability, Vol. 12, no. 20, p. 8438, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  10. S. Galea, R. M. Merchant, and N. Lurie, „The mental health consequences of Covid-19 and physical distancing: the need for prevention and early intervention’, JAMA Intern. Med., Vol. 180, no. 6, pp. 817–818, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  11. Q. N. Naveed, A. Muhammad, S. Sanober, M. R. N. Qureshi, and A. Shah, „A mixed method study for investigating critical success factors (CSFs) of e-learning in Saudi Arabian universities’, methods, Vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 171–178, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  12. M. Sadeghi, „A shift from classroom to distance learning: Advantages and limitations’, Int. J. Res. Engl. Educ., Vol. 4, no. 1 , pp. 80–88, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  13. P. R. Lowenthal and C. Snelson, „In search of a better understanding of social presence: An investigation into how researchers define social presence’, Distance Educ., Vol. 38, no. 2 , pp. 141–159, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  14. E. Beaunoyer, S. Dupéré, and M. J. Guitton, „Covid-19 and digital inequalities: Reciprocal impacts and mitigation strategies’, Comput. Hum. Behav., Vol. 111, p. 106424, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  15. A. Pragholapati, „Covid-19 impact on students’, 2020, Accessed: Apr. 03, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://edarxiv.org/895ed/download?format=pdf. [Google Scholar]
  16. E. Galy, C. Downey, and J. Johnson, „The effect of using e-learning tools in online and campus-based classrooms on student performance’, J. Inf. Technol. Educ. Res., Vol. 10, no. 1 , pp. 209–230, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  17. M. M. Nazarlou, „Research on negative effect on e-Learning’, Int. J. Mob. Netw. Commun. Telemat. IJMNCT Vol, Vol. 3, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  18. „Get Started with Design Thinking’, Stanford d.school. https://dschool.stanford.edu/resources/getting-started-with-design-thinking (accessed Apr. 04, 2021). [Google Scholar]
  19. H. W. J. Rittel and M. M. Webber, „Dilemmas in a general theory of planning’, Policy Sci., Vol. 4, no. 2 , pp. 155–169, Jun. 1973, doi: 10.1007/BF01405730. [Google Scholar]
  20. G. Melles, Z. Howard, and S. Thompson-Whiteside, „Teaching Design Thinking: Expanding Horizons in Design Education’, Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci., Vol. 31, pp. 162–166, Jan. 2012, doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.12.035. [Google Scholar]
  21. „Design Thinking’. https://hpi.de/en/school-of-design-thinking/design-thinking.html (accessed Apr. 04, 2021). [Google Scholar]
  22. V. J. Shute and R. J. Torres, 1 Where streams converge: Using evidence-centered design to assess Quest to Learn.. [Google Scholar]
  23. P. Micheli, S. J. S. Wilner, S. H. Bhatti, M. Mura, and M. B. Beverland, „Doing Design Thinking: Conceptual Review, Synthesis, and Research Agenda’, J. Prod. Innov. Manag., Vol. 36, no. 2 , pp. 124–148, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12466. [Google Scholar]
  24. R. Razzouk and V. Shute, „What Is Design Thinking and Why Is It Important?’, Rev. Educ. Res., Vol. 82, no. 3 , pp. 330–348, Sep. 2012, doi: 10.3102/0034654312457429. [Google Scholar]
  25. D. Braha and Y. Reich, „Topological structures for modeling engineering design processes’, Res. Eng. Des., Vol. 14, no. 4 , pp. 185–199, Nov. 2003, doi: 10.1007/s00163-003-0035-3. [Google Scholar]
  26. A. Hatchuel and B. Weil, „C-K design theory: an advanced formulation’, Res. Eng. Des., Vol. 19, no. 4 , pp. 181–192, Jan. 2009, doi: 10.1007/s00163-008-0043-4. [Google Scholar]
  27. J. Stempfle and P. Badke-Schaub, „Thinking in design teams an analysis of team communication’, Des. Stud., Vol. 23, no. 5 , pp. 473–496, Sep. 2002, doi: 10.1016/S0142-694X(02)00004-2. [Google Scholar]
  28. T. Brown and J. Wyatt, „Design Thinking for Social Innovation’, Dev. Outreach, Vol. 12, no. 1 , pp. 29–43, Jul. 2010, doi: 10.1596/1020-797X_12_1_29. [Google Scholar]
  29. M. B. Beverland, P. Micheli, and F. J. Farrelly, „Resourceful Sensemaking: Overcoming Barriers between Marketing and Design in NPD’, J. Prod. Innov. Manag., Vol. 33, no. 5 , pp. 628–648, 2016, doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12313. [Google Scholar]
  30. L. Carlgren, I. Rauth, and M. Elmquist, „Framing Design Thinking: The Concept in Idea and Enactment’, Creat. Innov. Manag., Vol. 25, no. 1 , pp. 38–57, 2016, doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12153. [Google Scholar]
  31. W. Hung, D. H. Jonassen, and R. Liu, Problem-Based Learning. Routledge Handbooks Online, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  32. C. E. Hmelo, „Problem-Based Learning: Effects on the Early Acquisition of Cognitive Skill in Medicine’, J. Learn. Sci., Vol. 7, no. 2 , pp. 173–208, Apr. 1998, doi: 10.1207/s15327809jls0702_2. [Google Scholar]
  33. A. Butler, K.-B. Phillmann, and L. Smart, „Active Learning Within a Lecture: Assessing the Impact of Short, In-Class Writing Exercises’, Teach. Psychol., Vol. 28, no. 4 , pp. 257–259, Nov. 2001, doi: 10.1207/S15328023TOP2804_04. [Google Scholar]
  34. V. Grecu and C. Deneş, „Developing Interpersonal, Communication and Critical Thinking Skills in Engineering Students’, Acta Univ. Cibiniensis, Vol. 72, no. 1 , pp. 17–22, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  35. W. Hung, „The 3C3R Model: A Conceptual Framework for Designing Problems in PBL’, Interdiscip. J. Probl.-Based Learn., Vol. 1, no. 1 , May 2006, doi: 10.7771/15415015.1006. [Google Scholar]
  36. T. Aberdeen, „Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th Ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.’, Can. J. Action Res., Vol. 14, no. 1 , Art. no. 1 , 2013, doi: 10.33524/cjar.v14i1.73. [Google Scholar]
  37. S. Morrison-Smith and J. Ruiz, „Challenges and barriers in virtual teams: a literature review’, SN Appl. Sci., Vol. 2, no. 6 , p. 1096, Jun. 2020, doi: 10.1007/s42452-0202801-5. [Google Scholar]
  38. J. Schmidtler, V. Knott, C. Hölzel, and K. Bengler, „Human Centered Assistance Applications for the working environment of the future’, Occup. Ergon., Vol. 12, no. 3 , pp. 83–95, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  39. V. Grecu and C. Denes, „Benefits of entrepreneurship education and training for engineering students’, MATEC Web Conf., Vol. 121, p. 12007, 2017, doi: 10.1051/matecconf/201712112007. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.