Open Access
Issue
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 343, 2021
10th International Conference on Manufacturing Science and Education – MSE 2021
Article Number 11004
Number of page(s) 13
Section Academic Education and Management
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/202134311004
Published online 04 August 2021
  1. F. M. Reimers, A. Schleicher, A framework to guide an education response to COVID-19 Pandemic of 2020, (OECD, 2020) [Google Scholar]
  2. R. Lake, L. Olson, Learning as We Go: Principles for Effective Assessment during the COVID19 Pandemic (Center on Reinventing Public Education, 2020) [Google Scholar]
  3. M. Scriven, The methodology of evaluation. In R. W. Tyler, R. M. Gagné, & M. Scriven (Eds.), Perspectives of curriculum evaluation, (Rand McNally, Chicago. IL, 1967) [Google Scholar]
  4. E. Hargreaves, Assessment. In G. McCulloch, & D. Crook (Eds.), The Routledge international encyclopaedia of education, (Routledge, New York, 2008) [Google Scholar]
  5. N. Pachler, C. Daly, Y. Mor, H. Mellar, Computers & Education, 54, 715, (2020) [Google Scholar]
  6. Z. Chen, Z., J. Jiao, J., K. Hu, IJDET, 19, 1, 1, (2021) [Google Scholar]
  7. E. Maclellan, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 29, 3, 311, (2004) [Google Scholar]
  8. J. L. Herman, A practical guide to alternative assessment, (Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, Pitt Street, Alexandria, 1992) [Google Scholar]
  9. C. T. McKevitt, Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 13, 1, 2, (2016) [Google Scholar]
  10. C. Janisch, X. Liu, A. Akrofi, The Educational Forum, 71, 3, 221, (2007) [Google Scholar]
  11. L. A. Shepard, Educational Researcher, 29, 7, 4, (2000) [Google Scholar]
  12. T. C. Reeves, J.R Okey, in Constructivist learning environments Case studies in instructional design, (Educational Technology Publication. New Jersey, 1996) [Google Scholar]
  13. Z. Libman, Studies in Educational Evaluation, 36, 1-2, 63, (2010) [Google Scholar]
  14. S. Hase, C. Kenyon, Complicity: An international journal of complexity and education, 4, 1, 111, (2007) [Google Scholar]
  15. E. Oliver, E, HTS Theological Studies, 71, 3, 1, (2015) [Google Scholar]
  16. D. R. Garrison, N. D. Vaughan, Blended learning in higher education: Framework, principles, and guidelines (John Wiley & Sons, San Francisco, 2008) [Google Scholar]
  17. M. J. Koehler, P. Mishra, K. Kereluik, T. S. Shin, C. R. Graham, in Handbook of research on educational communications and technology, 101-111 (Springer, New York, NY, 2014) [Google Scholar]
  18. J. W. Creswell, V. L. P. Clark, Designing and conducting mixed methods research (Sage, Thousand Oaks, 2017) [Google Scholar]
  19. J. W. Creswell, J. D. Creswell, Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (Sage, Thousand Oaks, 2017) [Google Scholar]
  20. R. Yilmaz, Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 18, 1, 39, (2017) [Google Scholar]
  21. T. C. Reeves, Journal of Educational Computing Research, 23, 1, 101, (2000) [Google Scholar]
  22. T. Kellaghan, D. L. Stufflebeam (Eds.), International Handbook of Educational Evaluation: Part One: Perspectives/Part Two: Practice, (Springer Science & Business Media, 2012) [Google Scholar]
  23. E. Maclellan, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 29, 3, 311, (2004) [Google Scholar]
  24. S. Friese, Qualitative data analysis with ATLAS. ti., (Sage, Thousand Oaks, 2019) [Google Scholar]
  25. SIRD (Italian Society for Educational Rsearch) (Ed.), La DaD in emergenza: vissuti e valutazioni degli insegnanti italiani. Scelte metodologiche e primi risultati nazionali, (Pensa Multimedia, Lecce, 2021) [Google Scholar]
  26. Z. Libman, Studies in Educational Evaluation, 36, 1-2, 62, (2010) [Google Scholar]
  27. N. Nasri, S. N. Roslan, M. I. Sekuan, K. A Bakar, S. N. Puteh, Procedia-Social and behavioral sciences, 7, 37, (2010) [Google Scholar]
  28. J. Herrington, T. C. Reeves, R. Oliver, Distance Education, 27, 2, 233, (2006) [Google Scholar]
  29. T. Amiel, J. Herrington, in Informed design of educational technologies in higher education: Enhanced learning and teaching, (IGI Global, Hershey, PA, USA, 2012) [Google Scholar]
  30. D. Lawton, N. Vye, J. Bransford, E. Sanders, M. Richey, D. French, R. Stephens, Journal of Engineering Education, 101, 2, 244, (2012) [Google Scholar]
  31. J. Gaytan, B. C. McEwen, The American Journal of Distance Education, 21, 3, 117, (2007) [Google Scholar]
  32. C. Rapanta, L. Botturi, P. Goodyear, L. Guàrdia, M. Koole, Postdigital Science and Education, 2, 3, 923, (2020) [Google Scholar]
  33. S. Mathur, T. Murray, in Online assessment, measurement and evaluation: Emerging practices, (IGI Global, Hershey, PA, USA, 2006) [Google Scholar]
  34. M. Bearman, P. Dawson, D. Boud, S. Bennett, M. Hall, E. Molloy, Teaching in Higher Education, 21, 5, 545, (2016) [Google Scholar]
  35. A. Munoz, J. Mackay, Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 16, 3, (2019) [Google Scholar]
  36. G. Watson, J. Sottile, J. G. Liang, Journal of Research in Education, 24, 1, 120, (2014). [Google Scholar]
  37. P. Williams, Teaching in Higher Education, 19, 5, 565, (2014) [Google Scholar]
  38. E. Gozuyesil, I. Tanriseven, Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 17, 70, 37, (2017) [Google Scholar]
  39. R. Benson, C. Brack, Online learning and assessment in higher education: A planning guide, (Chandos Publishing, Oxford, 2010) [Google Scholar]
  40. R. L. Chang, K. Gray, Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 25, 3, 147, (2013) [Google Scholar]
  41. D. Jonassen, J. Howland, R. M. Marra, D. Crismond, Meaningful Learning with Technology (Pearson Education Inc., New Jersey, 2009) [Google Scholar]
  42. B. C. Litchfield, J. V. Dempsey, New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 142, 142, 65, (2015) [Google Scholar]
  43. S. Bennett, P. Dawson, M. Bearman, E. Molloy, D. Boud, British Journal of Educational Technology, 48, 2, 672, (2017) [Google Scholar]
  44. Z. Libman, Studies in Educational Evaluation, 36, 1-2, 62, (2010) [Google Scholar]
  45. J. Gaytan, B. C. McEwen, The American JournalofDistanceEducation, 21, 3, 117, (2007) [Google Scholar]
  46. S. Vonderwell, X. Liang, K. Alderman, Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 39, 3, 309, (2007) [Google Scholar]
  47. D. A. Schön, Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 27, 6, 27, (1995) [Google Scholar]
  48. R. Benson, C. Brack, Online learning and assessment in higher education: A planning guide, (Chandos Publishing, Oxford, 2010) [Google Scholar]
  49. L. Dunn, C. Morgan, M. O’Reilly, S. Parry, The student assessment handbook: New directions in traditional and online assessment, (Routledge, London, 2003) [Google Scholar]
  50. J. W. Gikandi, D. Morrow, N. E. Davis, Computers & Education, 57, 4, 2333, (2011) [Google Scholar]
  51. J. Mateo, A. Sangrà, European Journal of open, distance and E-learning, 10, 2, (2007) [Google Scholar]
  52. D. J. Nicol, D. Macfarlane‐Dick, Studies in higher education, 31, 2, 199, (2006) [Google Scholar]
  53. M. Birenbaum, K. Breuer, E. Cascallar, F. Dochy, Y. Dori, J. Ridgway, G. Nickmans, Educational Research Review, 1, 1, 61, (2006) [Google Scholar]
  54. J. W. Looney, Integrating Formative and Summative Assessment: Progress Toward a Seamless System? (OECD Education Working Papers, No. 58, OECD Publishing, 2011) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.