MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 342, 20219th edition of the International Multidisciplinary Symposium “UNIVERSITARIA SIMPRO 2021”: Quality and Innovation in Education, Research and Industry – the Success Triangle for a Sustainable Economic, Social and Environmental Development”
|Number of page(s)||11|
|Section||Advances in Safety Science and Occupational Risk Management|
|Published online||20 July 2021|
- Cavender, F., Phillips, S., & Holland, M. (2008). Development of emergency response planning guidelines (ERPGs). Journal of Medical Toxicology, 4(2), 127–131. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03160967. [Google Scholar]
- Rus, D., Vasilescu, G., Kovacs, A., Gheorghiosu, E., & Jitea, I.-C. (2017). Improving the group decision by optimization of risk management for specific activities with explosives for civil use. Quality-Access to Success, 18, 41–46. American Institute of Chemical Engineers AIChE. (2000). Guidelines for Chemical Process Quantitative Risk Analysis, 2nd Edition (Second Edition). New York. [Google Scholar]
- Aven, T. (2008). Risk Analysis: Assessing Uncertainties Beyond Expected Values and Probabilities. Wiley. [Google Scholar]
- Bejinariu, C., Darabont, D.-C., Baciu, E.-R., Georgescu, I.-S., Bernevig-Sava, M.-A., & Baciu, C. (2017). Considerations on Applying the Method for Assessing the Level of Safety at Work. Sustainability, 9(7), 1263. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9071263. [Google Scholar]
- EN 1991-1-7. (2006). Eurocode 1 Actions on structures Part 1-7: General actions Accidental actions. European Committee for Standardisation CEN. [Google Scholar]
- Department of Defense DoD. (2016). UFC 4-023-03. Design of Buildings to Resist Progressive Collapse. [Google Scholar]
- Dinu, F., Dubina, D., & Marginean, I. (2015). Improving the structural robustness of multi-story steel-frame buildings. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering, 11(8), 1028–1041. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2014.927509. [Google Scholar]
- Mazurkiewicz, L., Malachowski, J., & Baranowski, P. (2015). Blast loading influence on load carrying capacity of I-column. Engineering Structures, 104, 107–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.09.025. [Google Scholar]
- American Institute of Chemical Engineers AIChE. (2000). Guidelines for Chemical Process Quantitative Risk Analysis, 2nd Edition (Second Edition). New York. [Google Scholar]
- Darabont, D.-C., Moraru, R. I., Antonov, A. E., & Bejinariu, C. (2017). Managing new and emerging risks in the context of ISO 45001 standard. Quality-Access to Success, 18, 11–14. [Google Scholar]
- Ross, T., Tatom, J., & et al. (2015). IMESAFR Version 2.0, Safety Assessment for Risk. Technical Manual. A-P-T Research Inc, USA: Institute of Makers of Explosives. [Google Scholar]
- Explosives regulations. (2014). Explosives regulations 2014: safety provisions: guidance on regulations. Merseyside: Health and Safety Executive, HSE Books. [Google Scholar]
- Department of Defense DoD. (2014). UFC 3-340-02. Structures to resist the effects of accidental explosions. Washington DC. [Google Scholar]
- PN-III-P2-2.1-PED-2019-1675, within PNCDI III: “Explosion-proof safety of building enclosures. Executive Agency for Higher Education, Research, Development and Innovation Funding. [Google Scholar]
- Gheorghiosu, E., Ghicioi, E., Kovacs, A., Vasilescu, G., & Rus, D. (2017). Determination of the Delay Accuracy of the Components of Non-Electric Initiation Systems. Environmental Engineering and Management Journal, 16(6), 1283–1287. https://doi.org/10.30638/eemj.2017.135. [Google Scholar]
- Kovacs, A., Vasilescu, G., Gheorghiosu, E., Rus, D., Jitea, I.-C., & Bordos, S. (2017). Appropriate management of preventing actions on health and safety for testing activities of high explosives in confined environment. Quality-Access to Success, 18, 93–96. [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.