Open Access
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 321, 2020
The 14th World Conference on Titanium (Ti 2019)
Article Number 12037
Number of page(s) 5
Section Microstructure Evolution
Published online 12 October 2020
  1. B. Guo, S.L. Semiatin, J.J. Jonas, S. Yue, Dynamic transformation of Ti–6Al–4V during torsion in the two-phase region, J. Mater. Sci. 53 (2018) 9305-9315. doi:10.1007/s10853-018-2237-0. [Google Scholar]
  2. B. Guo, S.L. Semiatin, J. Liang, B. Sun, J.J. Jonas, Opposing and Driving Forces Associated with the Dynamic Transformation of Ti-6Al-4V, Metall. Mater. Trans. A Phys. Metall. Mater. Sci. 49 (2018) 1-5. doi:10.1007/s11661-018-4551-1. [Google Scholar]
  3. L. Zhao, N. Park, Y. Tian, A. Shibata, N. Tsuji, Combination of dynamic transformation and dynamic recrystallization for realizing ultrafine-grained steels with superior mechanical properties, Sci. Rep. 6 (2016) 1-11. doi:10.1038/srep39127. [Google Scholar]
  4. D. Canelo-Yubero, G. Requena, F. Sket, C. Poletti, F. Warchomicka, J. Daniels, N. Schell, A. Stark, Load partition and microstructural evolution during in situ hot deformation of Ti-6Al-6V-2Sn alloys, Mater. Sci. Eng. A. 657 (2016) 244-258. doi:10.1016/j.msea.2016.01.059. [Google Scholar]
  5. A. Stark, M. Rackel, A. Tchouaha Tankoua, M. Oehring, N. Schell, L. Lottermoser, A. Schreyer, F. Pyczak, In Situ High-Energy X-ray Diffraction during Hot-Forming of a Multiphase TiAl Alloy, Metals (Basel). 5 (2015) 2252-2265. doi:10.3390/met5042252. [Google Scholar]
  6. G.C. Obasi, R.J. Moat, D.G. Leo Prakash, W. Kockelmann, J. Quinta da Fonseca, M. Preuss, In situ neutron diffraction study of texture evolution and variant selection during the α→β→αphase transformation in Ti–6Al–4V, Acta Mater. 60 (2012) 7169-7182. doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2012.09.026. [Google Scholar]
  7. J. Romero, M. Preuss, J. Quinta da Fonseca, Texture memory and variant selection during phase transformation of a zirconium alloy, Acta Mater. 57 (2009) 5501-5511. doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2009.07.046. [Google Scholar]
  8. B. Roebuck, J. Lord, L. Orkney, Validation of a Miniature Tensile Strength Measurement System, in: Small Specim. Test Tech. Fourth Vol., ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959, n.d.: pp. 234-250. doi:10.1520/STP10824S. [Google Scholar]
  9. B. Roebuck, D.C. Cox, R.C. Reed, An Innovative Device for the Mechanical Testing of Miniature Specimens of Superalloys, in: Superalloys 2004 (Tenth Int. Symp., TMS, 2004: pp. 523-528. doi:10.7449/2004/Superalloys_2004_523_528. [Google Scholar]
  10. M. Newville, T. Stensitzki, D.B. Allen, A. Ingargiola, LMFIT: Non-Linear Least-Square Minimization and Curve-Fitting for Python, (2014). doi:10.5281/zenodo.11813. [Google Scholar]
  11. S. Matthies, G.W. Vinel, On the Reproduction of the Orientation Distribution Function of Texturized Samples from Reduced Pole Figures Using the Conception of a Conditional Ghost Correction, Phys. Status Solidi. 112 (1982) K111–K114. doi:10.1002/pssb.2221120254. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.