Open Access
| Issue |
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 298, 2019
International Conference on Modern Trends in Manufacturing Technologies and Equipment: Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science (ICMTMTE 2019)
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Article Number | 00041 | |
| Number of page(s) | 5 | |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201929800041 | |
| Published online | 18 November 2019 | |
- M. Smith, L. Collis, P.G. Fookes. Aggregates: Sand, Gravel and Crushed Rock Aggregates for Construction Purposes (Bath: The Geological Society of London 2001) [Google Scholar]
- I. Dyakov, V. Ivkin, A. Popovich. A Soil Loosening Machine for Winter Earth-Moving in Transport Construction, Transport, Vol. 22(4), pp. 316-319 (2007). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- E. McKyes, J. Maswaure, Effect of Design Parameters of Flat Tillage Tools on Loosening of a Clay Soil, Soil & Tillage Research, Vol. 43(3-4), pp. 195-204 (1997). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- V.V Blednykh, P.G. Svechnikov, I.P. Troyanovskaya, Tractor Plough with Repeated Cutting Angle on Working Elements, Procedia Engineering, Vol. 206, pp. 1577-1582 (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- P.P. Raj, Soil Mechanics & Foundation Engineering (Chennai: Pearson Education India 2008) [Google Scholar]
- V.V Blednykh, P.G Svechnikov, I.P. Troyanovskaya, Moldboard surface universalization of the ploughshare operating unit, Procedia Engineering, Vol. 129, pp. 69–74 (2015) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- S.V. Kravets, O.V. Stinio, The determination of the force of blocked cuting of soil and coefficient of energy intensity of deep ripping of soil, Naukovyi Visnyk Natsionalnoho Hirnychoho Universytetu, Vol. 3, pp. 24-28 (2016) [Google Scholar]
- T. Yoneyama, Y. Hatamura, T. Nagao, K. Ogaki, Y. Iwamoto, Measurement of stress and temperature on the ripper point surface in the ripping of rock ground, Transactions of the Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers, Part C, Vol. 63(613), pp. 3313-3319 (1997) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- I. Shmulevich, Z. Asaf, D. Rubinstein, Interaction between soil and a wide cutting blade using the discrete element method, Soil and Tillage Research, Vol. 97(1), pp. 37-50 (2007) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Z. Asaf, D. Rubinstein, I. Shmulevich, Determination of discrete element model parameters required for soil tillage, Soil and Tillage Research, Vol. 92(1-2), pp. 227-242 (2007) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- H.H. Basarir, C.C. Karpuz, L.L. Tutluoğlu. 3D modeling of ripping process, International Journal of Geomechanics, Vol. 8(1), pp. 11-19 (2008) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- L. Pelevin, I. Gorbatyuk, S. Zaichenko, V. Shalenko, Developing a mathematical substantiation for the physical modelling of the soil-ripping equipment work process, Eastern European Journal of Enterprise Technologies, Vol. 6(2-90), pp. 52-60 (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- W.C. Swick, J.V. Perumpral, A model for predicting soil-tool interaction, Journal of Terramechanics, Vol. 25 (1), pp. 43-56 (1988) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- Z. Decha, Y. Yusu, A dynamic model for soil cutting by blade and tine, Journal of Terramechanics, Vol. 29 (3), pp. 317-327 (1992) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- S.A. Al-Suhaibani, A.E. Ghaly, Effect of plowing depth of tillage and forward speed on the performance of a medium size chisel plow operating in a sandy soil, American Journal of Agricultural and Biological Science, Vol. 5(3), pp. 247-255 (2010) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- J. Tong, B.Z. Moayad, Effects of rake angle of chisel plough on soil cutting factors and power requirements: A computer simulation, Soil and Tillage Research, Vol. 88(1-2), pp. 55-64 (2006) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
- V.V. Blednykh, P.G. Svechnikov, I.P. Troyanovskaya, Moldboard surface universalization of the ploughshare operating unit, Procedia Engineering, Vol. 150, pp. 1297-1302 (2016) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.
Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.
Initial download of the metrics may take a while.