Open Access
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 292, 2019
23rd International Conference on Circuits, Systems, Communications and Computers (CSCC 2019)
Article Number 04002
Number of page(s) 6
Section Signal Processing
Published online 24 September 2019
  1. D. I. Rubin, J. R. Daube, Rapid MUAP quantization, in: AANEM Workshop, 2008, pp. 1–7. [Google Scholar]
  2. Raez, M. B., Hussain, M. S., Mohd-Yasin, F. Techniques of EMG signal analysis: detection, processing, classification and applications. Biological Procedures Online, 8, 11-35 (2006). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. Y. S. Shmaliy, S. Zhao, C. K. Ahn, Unbiased FIR filtering: an iterative alternative to Kalman filtering ignoring noise and initial conditions, IEEE Control Syst Mag 37 (5) (2017) 70–89. [Google Scholar]
  4. J. Pomarico-Franquiz, S. Khan, Y.S. Shmaliy, Combined extended FIR/Kalman filtering for indoor robot localization via triangulation, Measurement, 50 (2014) 236–242. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  5. C. K. Ahn, Y. S. Shmaliy, P. Shi, Y. Zhao, Receding horizon l2-l FIR filter with imbedded deadbeat property, IEEE Trans. on Circuits and Systems-II: Express Briefs, 64 (2) (2017) 211-215. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. Y. Xu, Y. S. Shmaliy, Y. Li, X. Chen, UWB-based indoor human localization with time-delayed data using EFIR filtering, IEEE Access, 5 (2017) 16676–16683. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. Y. S. Shmaliy, On real-time optimal FIR estimation of linear TIE models of local clocks, IEEE Trans. on Usltrason., Ferroel., and Freg. Control, 54 (11) (2007) 2403-2406. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. R. M. Studer, R. J. P. Figueiredo, G. S. Moschytz, An algorithm for sequential signal estimation and system identification for EMG signals, IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 31 (3) (1984) 285–295. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. S. Schiaffino, C. Reggian, Fiber types in mammalian skeletal muscles, Physiological Review 91 (4) (2011) 1447–1531. [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. A. J. Fuglevand, D. A. Winter, A. E. Patla, D. Stashuk, Detection of motor unit action potentials with surface electrodes: influence of electrode size and spacing, Biological Cybernetics 67 (2) (1992) 143–153. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. D. Farina, A. Crosetti, R. Merletti, A model for the generation of synthetic intramuscular EMG signals to test decomposition algorithms, IEEE Eng. Medicine Biology Soc. 48 (2001) 66 – 77. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. Hamilton-Wright. A, Stashuk.D.W., Physiologically based simu lation of clinical EMG signals, IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 52 (2)(2005) 11–35. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. S. N. Kale, S. V. Dudul, Intelligent noise removal from EMG signal using focused time-lagged recurrent neural network, Appl. Comp. Intell. Soft Comput. 2009 (1) 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  14. S. Thongpanja, A. Phinyomark, F. Quaine, et al., Probability density functions of stationary surface EMG signals in noisy environments, IEEE Trans. Instrum. Measur. 63 (6) (2016) 1547–1557. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. G. Tallison, P. Godfrey, G. Robinson, EMG signal amplitude assessment during abdominal bracing and hollowing, J. Electromyography Kinesiology 8 (1) (1996) 51–57. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  16. G. Jang, J. Kim, S. Lee, Y. Choi, EMG-based continuous control scheme with simple classifier for electricpowered wheelchair, IEEE Trans. Industr. Electron. 65 (7) (2016) 3695–3705. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. L. Chen, Y. Hao, Feature extraction and classification of EHG between pregnancy and labour group using Hilbert-Huang transform and extreme learning machine, Comput Math Methods Med 2017 (7949507) (2017) 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  18. R. D’Alessio, S. Conforto, Extraction of the envelope from surface emg signals, IEEE Eng. Medicine Biology 20 (6) (2001) 55–61. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. H. Xie, Z. Wang, Mean frequency derived via Hilbert-Huang transform with application to fatigue EMG signal analysis, Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine 82 (2) (2006) 312–320. [Google Scholar]
  20. R. F. M. Kleissen, G. Zilvold, Estimation uncertainty in ensemble averaged surface EMG profiles during gait, J. Electromyography Kinesiology 4 (2) (1994) 83–94. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  21. H. W. V. Yeh, C. H. Young, C. Y. Wang, et al., Quantifying sasticity with limited swinging cycles using pendulum test based on phase amplitude coupling, IEEE Trans. Neural Systems Rehabil. Eng. 24 (10) (2016) 1081–1088. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. L. Ramíırez, M. Ruano, C. Younes, Anáalisis de bioseñales: Enfoque téecnico en el anáalisis clíınico de señnales fonocardiográaficas, 1st Edition, Univ. Nacional de Colombia, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  23. L. Myers, M. Lowery, M. OMalley, et al., Rectification and non-linear pre-processing of EMG signals for cortico-muscular analysis, J. Neuroscience Methods 124 (2) (2003) 157–165. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. T. J. Roberts, G. A. M., Interpreting muscle function from EMG: lessons learned from direct measurements of muscle force, Integrative and Comparative Biology 48 (2) (2008) 312–320. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. Y. Zhan, S. Guo, K. M. Kendrick, J. Feng, Filtering noise for synchronised activity in multi-trial electrophysiology data using Wiener and Kalman filters, BioSystems 96 (1) (2009) 1–13. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. N. M. Lopez, F. diSciascio, C. M. Soria, M. E. Valentinuzzi, Robust EMG sensing system based on data fusion for myoelectric control of a robotic arm, BioMedical Eng OnLine 8 (5) (2009) 1–13. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. C. S. L. Tsui, J. Q. Gan, S. J. Roberts, A self-paced braincomputer interface for controlling a robot simulator: an online event labelling paradigm and an extended Kalman filter based algorithm for online training, Med Biol Eng Comput 47 (3) (2009) 257–265. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. L. L. Menegaldo, Real-time muscle state estimation from EMG signals during isometric contractions using Kalman filters, Biol Cybern 111 (5-7) (2017) 335–346. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. T. Triwiyantoa, O. Wahyunggoroa, H. A. Nugrohoa, H. Herianto, Muscle fatigue compensation of the electromyography signal for elbow joint angle estimation using adaptive feature, Computers Electr. Eng. 71 (2018) 284–293. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. Y. S. Shmaliy, F. Lehmann, S. Zhao, C. K. Ahn, Comparing robustness of the Kalman, H, and UFIR filters, IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 66 (13) (2018) 3447–3458. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  31. G. De Luca, Fundamental Concepts in EMG Signal Acquisition, DelSys Inc., 2003. [Google Scholar]
  32. J. C. Ives, J. K. Wigglesworth, Sampling rate effects on surface EMG timing and amplitude measures, Clinical Biomechanics 18 (6) (2003) 543–552. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. Y. S. Shmaliy, Unbiased FIR filtering of discrete time polynomial state space models, IEEE Trans. Signal Process, 57 (4) (2009) 1241–1249. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. Y. S. Shmaliy, A. V. Marienko, A. V. Savchuk, GPS-based optimal Kalman estimation of time error, frequency offset, and aging, in: 31st PTTI Meeting, 1999, pp. 431–440. [Google Scholar]
  35. A. E. Bryson, L. J. Henrikson, Estimation using sampled data containing sequentially correlated noise, J. Spacecraft Rockets 5 (6) (1968) 662–665. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  36. Y. S. Shmaliy, S. Khan, S. Zhao, Ultimate iterative unbiased FIR filtering algorithm, Measurement, 92 (2016) 236–242. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  37. Y. S. Shmaliy, S. H. Khan, S. Zhao, O. Ibarra-Manzano, General unbiased FIR filter with applications to GPS-based steering of oscillator frequency, IEEE Trans. on Control Systems Technology, 25 (3) (2017) 1141-1148. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  38. O. Aviles, J. Rodriguez, M. Herrera, G. Martinez, UCI Machine Learning Repository. Bogota: Iniversidad Militar Nueva Granada, Tecno Parque SENA nodo Manizales. (2012). URL [Google Scholar]
  39. D. Dua, E. Karra Taniskidou, UCI Machine Learning Repository. Irvine, CA: University of California, School of Information and Computer Science. (2017). URL [Google Scholar]
  40. M. Atzori, A. Gijsberts, C. Castellini, at al, Electromyography data for non-invasive naturally controlled robotic hand protheses. Scientific Data 1:140053 (2014). URL [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.