Open Access
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 290, 2019
9th International Conference on Manufacturing Science and Education – MSE 2019 “Trends in New Industrial Revolution”
Article Number 07006
Number of page(s) 13
Section Management and Economic Engineering
Published online 21 August 2019
  1. S. Avasilcai, G.Rusu, Co-creation value through customers’ proactive engagement: A case study of Heineken(B), Fascicle of Manag and Techn. Eng., ISSN 1583-069, 24, 14 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  2. I. Abrudan, D. Cândea, Manual de Inginerie Economică. Ingineria şi managementul sistemelor de productie, Editura Dacia, Cluj-Napoca, ISBN 973-35-1588-4 837 (2002) [Google Scholar]
  3. M.S., Sangari, R. Hosnavi, M.R. Zahedi, The impact of knowledge management processes on supply chain performance, Int. J. Logist. Manag, 26, 3, pp.603–626 (2015) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  4. A. Draghici, Adaptive technologies and business integration: Social, managerial and organizational dimensions, IGI Global, pp.211-243 (2007) [Google Scholar]
  5. J. Drew, B. McCallum, S. Roggenhofer, Journey to lean: making operational change stick, Springer (2016) [Google Scholar]
  6. J.P. Womack, D.T. Jones, Lean thinking: banish waste and create wealth in your corporation: Free Press, ISBN13: 9780743249270 (2003) [Google Scholar]
  7. A. Cozzolino, S. Rossi, A. Conforti, Agile and lean principles in the humanitarian supply chain: The case of the United Nations World Food Programme. J. of Humanitarian Logist. and SC Manag., 2, 1, pp.16-33 (2012) [Google Scholar]
  8. V.C. Lassiter, The Role of Process Improvement in the Nonprofit Organization, (Master of Science in Organizational Dynamics), University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia (2007) [Google Scholar]
  9. B. Walker, D. Salt, Resilience Thinking; Sustaining Ecosystems and People in a Changing World, Island Press, Washington (2006) [Google Scholar]
  10. M. Christopher, D.R. Towill, The supply chain strategy conundrum: to be lean or agile or to be lean and agile? Int. J. Logist. Manag. 5, 3, pp.299-309 (2002) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. L. Lapide, MIT’s SC2020 project: The essence of excellence. S.C. Manag. Rev., 10, 3, (2006) [Google Scholar]
  12., accessed 20.01.2019 [Google Scholar]
  13. S.H. Huang, M. Uppal, M. Shi, J. A product driven approach to manufacturing supply chain selection, Supply Chain Management: An Int. J. 7, 4, pp.189–199 (2002) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  14. B. Gaudenzi, and M. Christopher, Achieving supply chain ‘leagility’, through a project management orientation, Int. J. of Log.: Research and Applications, 19, 1, pp.3–18 (2016) [Google Scholar]
  15. M. Christopher & D. Towill, An Integrated Model for the Design of Agile Supply Chains, Int. J. Phys. Distrib. & Log. Manag., 31, 4 (2001) [Google Scholar]
  16. D.P. Van Donk, and R. Van Doorne, The impact of the customer order decoupling point on type and level of supply chain integration, Int. J. Prod. Research, 54, 9, pp.2572–2584 (2016) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. A. Banerjee, F. Ganjeizadeh, Modeling a Leagility Index for Supply Chain Sustenance, Procedia Manufacturing 11, pp.996-1003 (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. M. Hallgren, J. Olhager, Lean and agile manufacturing: external and ınternal drivers and performance outcomes, Int. J. of Op. & Prod. Manag., 29, 10, pp.976–999 (2009) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. F. Qi, X. Xuejun, G. Zhiyong, Research on lean, agile and leagile supply chain, IEEE Int. Conf. on Wireless Communications, Networking & Mob. Computing, Shangai, pp.4902–4905 (2007) [Google Scholar]
  20. S. Hoekstra, J. Romme, Integrated Logistics Structures: Developing Customer Oriented Goods Flow, McGraw-Hill, London (1992) [Google Scholar]
  21. J.B. Naylor, M. Naim, D. Berry, Leagility: integrating the lean and agile manufacturing paradigms in the total supply chain, Int. J. Prod. Econ. 62 (1-2), pp.107-118 (1999) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  22. R. Mason-Jones, D.R. Towill, Using the information decoupling point to improve supply chain performance, Int. J. Logist. Manag. 10, 2, pp.13-26 (1999) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. J. Olhager, The role of decoupling points in value chain management. In Modelling value. 37-47. Physica-Verlag HD, (2012) [Google Scholar]
  24. J. Olhager, The role of the customer order decoupling point in production and supply chain management, Computers in Industry, 61, 9, pp.863–868 (2010) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. J. Wikner, M. Rudberg, Integrating production and engineering perspectives on the customer order decoupling point, Int. J. Op. & Prod. Manag., 25, 7, pp.623–641 (2005) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. T.J. Van Kampen, D.P. Van Donk, When is ıt time to revise your SKU classification: setting and resetting the decoupling point in a dairy company, Prod. Plann. & Control, 25, 16, pp.1338–1350 (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  27. M. Christopher, The Agile Supply Chain: Competing in Volatile Markets. Ind. Mark. Man., 29, 1, 37-44, (2000) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. M. Christopher, D.R. Towill, Don’t lean too far - evidence from the first decade. Int. J. Agile Syst. Manag. 2 (4), pp.406-424 (2007) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  29. K.A. Ferreira, R.L. Alcantara-Chicarelli, Postponement adoption in manufacturers of tomato-derived products, British Food J., 118, 2, pp.362–378 (2016) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  30. E. Feitzinger, H.L. Lee, Mass customization at Hewlett-Packard: the power of postponement, Harv. Bus. Rev. 75 (1), pp.116-121 (1997) [Google Scholar]
  31. R. Krishnamurthy, C.A. Yauch, Leagile manufacturing: A proposed corporate infrastructure, Int. J. of Op. and Prod. Manag., 27, 6, pp.588-604 (2007) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  32. P. Nieuwenhuis, E. Katsifou, More sustainable automotive production through understanding decoupling points in leagile manufacturing. J. of Cleaner Prod., 95, 232-241, (2015) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  33. P. Childerhouse, D. Towill, Engineering supply chains to match customer requirements’, Logistics Information Manag., 13, 6, pp.337–345 (2000) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  34. H.E. Aktan, and G. Akyuz, Positioning the decoupling point along a supply chain: a case study, Int. J. Productivity and Quality Management, 22, 3, pp.309–339 (2017) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  35., accessed 20.01.2019 [Google Scholar]
  36. M. Faur, C. Bungau, Supply Chain ‘Leagility’ through Adopting Consignment Stock Strategy in Manufacturing Companies, RMEE - 6th International Management Conference (2018) [Google Scholar]
  37. A. Dolgui, J.-M. Proth, Outsourcing: definitions and analysis. Int. J. of Prod. Research, 51, 23-24, pp.6769-6777 (2013) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  38. M. Scherrer-Rathje, P. Deflorin, G. Anand, Manufacturing flexibility through outsourcing: effects of contingencies, Int. J.of Op. & Prod. Manag., 34, 9, 1210-1242 (2014) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  39. M. Gylling, J. Heikkilä, K. Jussila, M. Saarinen, Making decisions on offshore outsourcing and backshoring: A case study in the bicycle industry. Int. J. of Prod. Ec., 162, 92100 (2015) [Google Scholar]
  40. M. Faur, Perspectives in Developing the Suppliers’ Strategy within Procurement Processes, RMEE, 17, 1, pp. 99-111 (2018) [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.