Open Access
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 281, 2019
International Conference of Engineering Risk (INCER 2019)
Article Number 01008
Number of page(s) 7
Section Civil Infrastructures: Bridges, Structures, Dams
Published online 21 May 2019
  1. S. Hosseini, K. Barker, and J.E. Ramirez-Marquez, A review of definitions and measures of system resilience, Reliability Engineering & System Safety 145 (2016):47-61. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. S.B. Manyena, The concept of resilience revisited, Disasters 30 (2006):434-450. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  3. P. Gardoni, Routledge Handbook of Sustainable and Resilient Infrastructure, (2018). [Google Scholar]
  4. G.P. Cimellaro, A. Zamani-Noori, O. Kammouh, V. Terzic, and S.A. Mahin, Resilience of Critical Structures, Infrastructure, and Communities, Berkeley, California: Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center (PEER), 2016. [Google Scholar]
  5. S.L. Cutter, L. Barnes, M. Berry, C. Burton, E. Evans, E. Tate, and J. Webb, A place-based model for understanding community resilience to natural disasters, Global environmental change 18 (2008):598-606. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  6. O. Kammouh, A.Z. Noori, G.P. Cimellaro, and S.A. Mahin, Resilience Assessment of Urban Communities, ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering 5 (2019):04019002. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  7. O. Kammouh, G. Dervishaj, and G.P. Cimellaro, Quantitative Framework to Assess Resilience and Risk at the Country Level, ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering 4 (2018):04017033. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  8. O. Kammouh, A.Z. Noori, V. Taurino, S.A. Mahin, and G.P. Cimellaro, Deterministic and fuzzy-based methods to evaluate community resilience, Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration 17 (2018):261-275. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. O. Kammouh, G.P. Cimellaro, and S.A. Mahin, Downtime estimation and analysis of lifelines after an earthquake, Engineering Structures 173 (2018):393-403. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  10. N. Doorn, P. Gardoni, and C. Murphy, A multidisciplinary definition and evaluation of resilience: the role of social justice in defining resilience, Sustainable and Resilient Infrastructure (2018):1-12. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  11. O. Kammouh, G. Dervishaj, and G.P. Cimellaro, A New Resilience Rating System for Countries and States, Procedia Engineering 198 (2017):985-998. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  12. M. De Iuliis, O. Kammouh, G.P. Cimellaro, and S. Tesfamariam, Downtime estimation of building structures using fuzzy logic, International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction (2018). [Google Scholar]
  13. A. Tabandeh, P. Gardoni, C. Murphy, and N. Myers, Societal Risk and Resilience Analysis: Dynamic Bayesian Network Formulation of a Capability Approach, ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems, Part A: Civil Engineering 5 (2018):04018046. [Google Scholar]
  14. K.P. Murphy, and S. Russell, Dynamic bayesian networks: representation, inference and learning, (2002). [Google Scholar]
  15. J. Hulst, Modeling physiological processes with dynamic Bayesian networks, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Mathematics, and Computer Science, University of Pittsburgh (2006). [Google Scholar]
  16. M. Bruneau, and A. Reinhorn, Exploring the concept of seismic resilience for acute care facilities, Earthquake Spectra 23 (2007):41-62. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  17. G.P. Cimellaro, A.M. Reinhorn, and M. Bruneau, Framework for analytical quantification of disaster resilience, Engineering Structures 32 (2010):3639-3649. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. N. Sharma, A. Tabandeh, and P. Gardoni, Resilience analysis: A mathematical formulation to model resilience of engineering systems, Sustainable and Resilient Infrastructure 3 (2018):49-67. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.