Open Access
Issue
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 280, 2019
The 5th International Conference on Sustainable Built Environment (ICSBE 2018)
Article Number 01004
Number of page(s) 10
Section Disaster Risk Management
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201928001004
Published online 08 May 2019
  1. R. R. Putra, J. Kiyono, Y. Ono, and H. R. Parajuli, “Sismic Hazard Analysis for Indonesia,” J. Nat. Disaster Sci., vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 59–70, 2012. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. Hidayanti, “New Evidence the Tsunami Source of the 11 September 1921 Java Earthquake,” 2015. [Google Scholar]
  3. A. S. Elnashai, S. J. Kim, G. J. Yun, and D. Sidarta, “The Yogyakarta Earthquake of May 27, 2006,” 2007. [Google Scholar]
  4. Z. Adrian, “Debating Modern Indonesian Architecture - WhyGo,” Whygo. [Online]. Available: https://www.whygo.com/indonesia/destinations/debating-modern-indonesian-architecture.html. [Accessed: 24-Jul-2018]. [Google Scholar]
  5. T. Boen, “Yogya Earthquake 27 May 2006, Structural Damage Report,” 2006. [Google Scholar]
  6. Sumintardja, Kompendium sejarah arsitektur, 2nd ed. Bandung: Yayasan Lembaga Penyelidikan Masalah Bangunan, 1978. [Google Scholar]
  7. Prijotomo, Ideas and forms of Javanese architecture. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press, 1988. [Google Scholar]
  8. N. C. Idham, “Javanese Vernacular Architecture of Indonesia: Study of Environmental Acclimatization in Warm-Humid Climate,” Eastern Mediterranean University, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  9. N. C. Idham, Prinsip-Prinsip Desain Arsitektur Tahan Gempa, 1st ed. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Andi, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  10. A. Bahauddin, S. Hardono, A. Abdullah, and N. Z. Maliki, “The Minangkabau house: architectural and cultural elements,” WIT Trans. Ecol. Environ., vol. 165, no. 2. [Google Scholar]
  11. T. B. Usop, “Pelestarian Arsitektur Tradisional Dayak pada Pengenalan Ragam Bentuk Konstruksi dan Teknologi Tradisional Dayak di Kalimantan Tengah,” Perspekt. Arsit., vol. 9, no. 2, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  12. M. Sulistijowati, “Struktur di Arsitektur Nusantara,” in Temu Ilmiah IPLBI 2016, 2016, pp. 19–24. [Google Scholar]
  13. P. Adytia, Antariksa, and A. M. Ridjal, “Elemen Pembentuk Arsitektur Tradisional Batak Karo di Kampung Dokan,” Media Nemiti. [Google Scholar]
  14. Y. Sumalyo, Arsitektur kolonial Belanda di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press, 1993. [Google Scholar]
  15. J. Widodo and Y. Wong, “Visual Database of Modern Dutch Tropical Architecture in Indonesia,” NUS Singapore, 2002. [Online]. Available: http://www.arch.nus.edu.sg/casa/projects/tropical_ind/index.html. [Google Scholar]
  16. N. C. Idham, “Seismic Vulnerability Assessment In Vernacular Houses: The Rapid Visual Screening Procedure for Non Engineered Building with Application to Java Indonesia,” Eastern Mediterranean University, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  17. N. C. Idham and M. Mohd, “Eartquake Vulnerability Level of Reconstructed Houses, Lesson Learned after Ten Years Java Eartquake 2006,” SHS Web Conf., vol. 41, p. 06004, Jan. 2018. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Pedoman Pembangunan Bangunan Tahan Gempa. Jakarta: Departemen Pekerjaan Umum, 1993. [Google Scholar]
  19. Pedoman Teknis Rumah dan Bangunan Gedung Tahan Gempa. Jakarta: Cipta Karya, 2006. [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.