Open Access
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 280, 2019
The 5th International Conference on Sustainable Built Environment (ICSBE 2018)
Article Number 01005
Number of page(s) 18
Section Disaster Risk Management
Published online 08 May 2019
  1. H. Sucuoglu and A. Nurtug, Earthquake ground motion characteristics and seismic energy dissipation, Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn., Vol. 24, no. 9, pp. 1195–1213, (1995). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  2. R. Riddel, Correlation between ground motion intensity indices and structural response, Department of Structural and Geotechnical Engineering, Universidadn Catolica de Chile, (2005) [Google Scholar]
  3. L. Danciu, Development of a system to assess the earthquake damage potential for buildings: Intensiometer Development of a System to Assess the Earthquake Damage Potential for Buildings: Intensiometer, Univ.of Patras, 253p, (2006.). [Google Scholar]
  4. L.Ye, Q.Ma, Z.Miao, H.Guan, Y Zhuge, Numerical and comparative study of earthquake intensity indices in seismic analysis, The structural design of tall and special building, DOI: 10.1002/tal/693, (2011) [Google Scholar]
  5. N. Buratti., “A comparison of the performances of various ground–motion intensity measures,” Proc. 15th World Conf. Earthq. Eng., pp. 1–10, (2012). [Google Scholar]
  6. Y. Cheng, Intensity Measures for Seismic Response Prediction and associated Ground Motion Selection and Modification, Universitas Roma La Sapienza, (2013). [Google Scholar]
  7. H.A.D.K Buddika, A.C. Wijeyewickrema, Effects of earthquake ground motion duration on reinforced concrete buildings, 4th Multidisplinary International Student Workshop, Tokyo Institute of Technology, (2012). [Google Scholar]
  8. M. Raghunandan, A.B.Liel, Effects of earthquake ground motion duration on earthquake induce structural collapse, Structural Safety, Vol. 41, pp. 119–133, (2013). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. R Chandramohan, J.W Baker, G.G Dierlein, Quantifying the influence of ground motion duration on structural collapse capacity using spectrally equivalent records, Dept. of Civil Environmental Engineeiung, Stanford University, CA 94305, (2014) [Google Scholar]
  10. A.R Barbosa, F.L.A Ribeiro, L.A.C Neves, Influence of earthquake ground motion duration on Damage estimation: Application to steel moment resisting frame, submitted to Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, (2016) [Google Scholar]
  11. M.D Trifunac, A.G Brady, a Study on the duration of strong earthquake ground motion, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, Vol.65, No.3, pp.581-626, (1975) [Google Scholar]
  12. J.J. Bommer, A.M Pereira, The effective duration of earthquake strong motion, J.of Earthq. Eng, Vo.3, No.2, pp.127-172, (1999). [Google Scholar]
  13. J.ThSnaebjornsson, R Sigbjornsson, The duration characteristics of earthquake ground motions, The 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Beijing, China, (2008), [Google Scholar]
  14. J.J Kempton, J.P Stewart, Prediction equations for significant duration of earthquake ground motions considering site and near source effects, Earthquake Spectra, Vol. 22, pp. 985–1013, (2006) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  15. S Ghalat, Duration Characteristics of the Mean Horizontal Component of Shallow Crustal earthquake Records at Active Tectonic Regions, PhD Dissertation, Arizona State University, 214p, (2011) [Google Scholar]
  16. B.Hernandez, A.F.Cotton, Empirical determination of the ground shaking duration due to an earthquake using strong motion acceleration for engineering application, 12th WCEE, New Zealand, (2000) [Google Scholar]
  17. S.Y. Sabegh, Z Shoghian, M.N Sheikh, A new model for the prediction of earthquake ground motion duration in Iran, Submitted to Natural Hazards, (2014) [Google Scholar]
  18. Y.T Lee, K.F.Ma, Y.J Wang, K.L.Wen, An emprirical equation of effective shaking duration for moderate to large earthquake, Nat. Hazards, vol. 75, pp.1779–1793, (2015) [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. P Dong, Effects of varying hysteretic model’s and damage models on damage assessment of RC structure’s under standard design level earthquakes obtained using new scaling method, PhD thesis Department of Civil Engineering, University of Canterbury, Christchurch New Zealand, 2003, 226p. [Google Scholar]
  20. A. J. Carr, Ruaumoko Theory, Comput. Progr. Libr., Vol. 1, 87p, (2007). [Google Scholar]
  21. R.Sinha, S.R.Shiradhonkar, Seismic Damage Index for classification of structural damage, The 15th WCEE, Lisboa, (2012) [Google Scholar]
  22. M.Mihai, A theoretical review of the damage indices used to model the dynamic nonlinear behavior of reinforced concrete structures, Buletinul Institutului Pilitehnic Din Aisi, (2013) [Google Scholar]
  23. V.V.Chao, H.Ronach, M Ashraf, H. Baji, A New damage index for reinforced concrete structures subjected to seismic loads, School of Civil Engineering University of Queensland, Australia, (2015). [Google Scholar]
  24. T Paulay, M.J.N. Priestley, Seismic design of reinforced concrete and masonry buildings, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., 774p, (1992). [Google Scholar]
  25. W. K. Tso, T. J. Zhu, and A. C. Heidebrecht, Engineering implication of ground motion A / V ratio, Soil Dyn. Earthq. Eng., Vol. 11, pp. 133–144, (1992). [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. E.Ozer, S Soyoz, M. Celebi, Effects of strong motion duration on structural dmage, The 15th WCEE, Lisboa, (2012). [Google Scholar]
  27. A.G Asuero, A. Sayago, A.G Gonzales, The Correlation coefficient: An Overview, Critical Review in Analytical Chemistry, vol.36, pp 41–59, (2006). [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.