EDP Sciences logo
Web of Conferences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 272 (2019) MATEC Web Conf., 272 (2019) 01012 References
Open Access
Issue
MATEC Web Conf.
Volume 272, 2019
2018 2nd International Conference on Functional Materials and Chemical Engineering (ICFMCE 2018)
Article Number 01012
Number of page(s) 9
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201927201012
Published online 13 March 2019
  1. Liu H L, Yu X J. Advance in Soil Dynamics and Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering[J]. Journal of Hohai University (Natural Sciences), 1999(1): 6-15. [Google Scholar]
  2. Chen Y M, Gao X, Liu H L. Simplified method of flow deformation induced by liquefied sand[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2013, 36(6): 1567-1573. [Google Scholar]
  3. Cao Z Z, Liu Y D, Yuan X M. Liquefaction characteristics and mechanism of gravelly soils[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2016, 38(7): 1165-1174. [Google Scholar]
  4. Wang W S. The dynamic strength and liquefaction characteristics of soil[M]. Beijing:China Electric Power Press, 1997. [Google Scholar]
  5. Shi Z J, Wang L M. Soil dynamic characteristics-Liquefaction potential and hazard assessment[M]. Beijing: Seismological Press, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  6. Wang G, Zhang J M. Recent advances in seismic liquefaction research[J]. Advances in Mechanics, 2007, 37(11): 575-589. [Google Scholar]
  7. Chen G X. Earthquake engineering[M]. Beijing:Science Press, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  8. Adalier K, Sharp M K. Embankment dam on liquefiable foundation - Dynamic behavior and densification remediation[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2004,130(11): 1214-1224. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  9. Hayashi K, Miyoshi T, Yoneya H, et al. Fundamental tests on stabilized sand using acid silica sol[C]//2nd Int. Conf. on Ground Improvement Geosystems. Canada: International Association for Earthquake Engineering, 1996: 695–700. [Google Scholar]
  10. Hayashi K, Yoshikawa R, Hayashi N, et al. A field test on a new chemical grouting method to improve the liquefaction resistance of sandy layers beneath the existing structures[C]//International Symposium on Coastal Geotechnical Engineering in Practice. Yokohama, 2000: 291–297. [Google Scholar]
  11. Rasouli R, Hayashi K, Zen K, et al. Controlled permeation grouting method for mitigation of liquefaction[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2016, 142(11): 4016052. [Google Scholar]
  12. Takano S, Hayashi K, Zen K, et al. Controlled Curved Drilling Technique in the Permeation Grouting Method for Improvement Works of an Airport in Operation[J]. Procedia Engineering, 2016, 143: 539–547. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  13. Yoshimi Y, Tanaka K, Tokimatsu K. Liquefaction resistance of partially saturated sand[J]. Soils and Foundations, 1989, 29(3): 157–162. [Google Scholar]
  14. Yasuda S, Kobayashi T, Fukushima Y. Effect of degree of saturation on the liquefaction strength of Masa[C]//Proceedings of 34th Japanese National Conference Geotechnical Engineering. Tokyo, 1999: 2071–2072. [Google Scholar]
  15. Huang Y, Tsuchiya H, Ishihara K. Estimation of partial saturation effect on liquefaction resistance of sand using P-wave velocity[C]//Proceedings of Japanese Geotechnical Society. Nerada: 1999: 431–434. [Google Scholar]
  16. Ishihara K, Tsuchiya H, Huang Y. Recent studies on liquefaction studied on sandeffect of saturation[C]//Proceedings of 4th International Conference on Recent Advance in Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics. San Diego, 2001: 1–7. [Google Scholar]
  17. Okamura M, Ishihara M, Tamura K. Degree of saturation and liquefaction resistances of sand improved with sand compaction pile[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, American Society of Civil Engineers, 2006, 132(2): 258–264. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  18. Okamura M, Takebayashi M, Nishida K, et al. In-situ desaturation test by air injection and its evaluation through field monitoring and multiphase flow simulation[J].Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2011, 137: 643–652. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  19. He J, Ivanov V, Chu J. Mitigation of liquefaction of saturated sand using biogas[J]. Géotechnique, 2013, 63(4):267–275. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  20. He J, Chu J. Undrained responses of microbially desaturated sand under monotonic loading[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2014(12): 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  21. Eseller-Bayat E, Yegian M K, Alshawabkeh A, et al. Liquefaction response of partially saturated sands (I): Experimental results[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenviromental Engineering, 2012, 139(7): 863–871. [Google Scholar]
  22. Eseller-Bayat E, Yegian M K, Alshawabkeh A, et al. Liquefaction response of partially saturated sands (II): empirical model[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2012, 139(6): 872–879. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  23. Yegian M K, Eseller-Bayat E, Alshawabkeh A, et al. Induced-partial saturation for liquefaction mitigation: experimental investigation[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2007, 133(4): 372–380. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  24. Juang C H,Yang S H,Yuan H M,et al. Liquefaction in the Chi-chi earthquake-effect of fines and capping non-liquefiable layers[J]. Soils and Foundations, 2005, 45(6): 89-101. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  25. Murugesan S,Rajagopal K. Geosynthetic-encased stone columns: Numerical evaluation[J]. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, 2006, 24(6): 349-358. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  26. Park Y H, Kim S R, Kim S H, et al. Liquefaction ofembankments on sandy soils and the optimumcounter measure against the liquefaction[C]//12th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Auckland, New Zealand, 2000(1): 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  27. Tsukamoto Y, Ishihara K, Yamamoto M, et al. Soil densification due to static sand pile installation for liquefaction remediation[J]. Soils and Foundations, 2000, 40(2): 9–20. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  28. Tanaka H, Kita H, Iida T, et al. Liquefaction countermeasure using steel sheet pile with drain capability[J]. The Sumitomo Search, 1996(58): 72–81. [Google Scholar]
  29. Liu H. Technological innovation methods and practices in geotechnical engineering[J]. Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 2013, 35(1): 34 – 58. [Google Scholar]
  30. Rasoulil R, Towhata I, Akima T.Experimental Evaluation of Drainage Pipes as a Mitigation against Liquefaction-Induced Settlement of Structures[J]. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 2016, 142(9): 04016041. [Google Scholar]
  31. Chen G X, Gu X F, Chang X D, et al. Review and implication of successful ground improvement cases about mitigating soil liquefaction induced by 8 strong earthquakes from 1989 to 2011[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2015, 36(4): 1102-1118. [Google Scholar]
  32. Zhang Y L, Yang P. Research progress in microorganism improving soil properties[J]. Microbiology China, 2014, 41(10): 2122-2127. [Google Scholar]
  33. Paassen L. Biogrout ground improvement by microbially induced carbonate precipitation[D]. Delft University of Technology, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  34. Cheng L, Shahin M A, Cord-Ruwisch R. Bio-cementation of sandy soil using microbially induced carbonateprecipitation for marine environments [J]. Géotechnique, 2014, 64(12): 1010–1013. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

Current usage metrics show cumulative count of Article Views (full-text article views including HTML views, PDF and ePub downloads, according to the available data) and Abstracts Views on Vision4Press platform.

Data correspond to usage on the plateform after 2015. The current usage metrics is available 48-96 hours after online publication and is updated daily on week days.

Initial download of the metrics may take a while.